Comsol -leaderboard other pages

Topics

Physics in a cold climate

cernlifeline1_2-00

For about twenty years, I was a member of the theory group at the Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow (ITEP). The ITEP was more than an institute, it was our refuge where the insanity of the surrounding reality was, if not eliminated, reduced to a bearable level.

Doing physics there was something which gave a meaning to our lives, making it interesting and even happy. Our theory group was like a large family. As in any big family, of course, this did not mean that everybody loved everybody else, but we knew that we had to stay together and rely on each other, no matter what, in order to survive and to be able to continue doing physics. This was considered by our teachers to be the most important thing, and this message was always being conveyed to young people joining the group. We had a wonderful feeling of stability.

Rules of survival

The rules of survival were quite strict. First, seminars – the famous Russian-style seminars. The primary goal of the speaker was to explain the results, not merely to advertise them. And if the results were nontrivial, or questionable, or just unclear, this would surface in the course of the seminar, and the standard two hours were not enough. Then the seminar could last for three or even four hours, until either everything was clear or complete exhaustion, whichever came first. I remember one seminar in Leningrad in 1979, when Gribov was still there, which started at eleven in the morning. A lunch break was announced from two to three, and the seminar continued until seven in the evening.

In ITEP we had three, sometimes more, theoretical seminars a week. The leaders and the secretaries of the seminars were supposed to find exciting topics, either by recruiting ITEP or other “domestic” authors, or, often, by picking up a paper or a preprint from elsewhere and asking somebody to report the work to the general audience. This was considered a moral obligation.

cernlifeline2_2-00

The tradition dated back to when Pomeranchuk was the head of the group, and its isolation had been even more severe. In those days there were no preprints, and getting fresh issues of Physical Review or Nuclear Physics was not taken for granted. When I, as a student, joined the group a few years after Pomeranchuk died, I was taken to the Pomeranchuk memorial library, his former office, where a collection of his books and journals was kept.

Every paper in every issue was marked with a minus or a plus sign, by “Chuk’s” hand. If there was a plus, there would also be the name of a student who had been asked to give a talk for everyone’s benefit. Before the scheduled day of the seminar, Pomeranchuk would summon the speaker to his office to assess whether the subject had been worked out sufficiently and the speaker was “ripe enough” to face the audience and their bloodthirsty questions.

Scientific reports of the few chosen to travel abroad were an unquestionable element of the seminar routine. Attendance at an international conference by no means was considered as a personal matter. Rather, these lucky guys were believed to be our ambassadors, and were supposed to represent the whole group. This meant that at a conference, you could be asked to present important results of other members of the group. Moreover, you were supposed to attend as many talks as possible, including those which did not belong to your field, make extensive notes, and, on your return, deliver an exhaustive report of all new developments, interesting questions raised, rumours, etc.

cernlifeline3_2-00

The rumours, as well as nonscientific impressions, were like an exotic dessert. I remember that after a visit to the Netherlands, one colleague mentioned that he was very surprised to see people on the streets smiling. He could not understand why. Then he finally figured it out: “because they were not concerned with building communism.” This remark almost immediately became known, and cost a few years of “inexplicable allergy” to any western exposure.

“Coffee seminars” typically lasted until nine, sometimes much later, for instance, in the stormy days of the 1974 “November revolution”. The few months following the discovery of J/psi were the star days of quantum chromodynamics, and probably the highest emotional peak of the ITEP theory group. Never were the mysteries of physics taken so close to our hearts as then. A spontaneously arranged team of enthusiasts worked practically nonstop. A limit to our discussions was set only by the Moscow metro – those who needed to catch the last train had to leave before 1 a.m. Living in the capital of that empire had its advantages. All intellectual forces tended to cluster in the capital. So, we had a very dynamic group where virtually every direction was represented by several theorists, experts in the given field. If you needed to learn something new, there was an easy way to do it. It was much faster and more efficient than reading through journals or textbooks. You just needed to talk to the right person.

Educating others, sharing your knowledge and expertise with everybody who might be interested, was another rule of survival. Different discussion groups and large collaborations were emerging all the time, creating a strong and positive coherent effect. The brain-storming sessions used to produce, among other results, a lot of noise. So, once you were inside the old mansion occupied by the theorists, it was very easy to figure out which task force was where – you just had to step out into the corridor and listen.

Fashionable physics

There is strong pressure in the world community to stay in the mainstream: to work only on fashionable directions and problems under investigation in dozens of other laboratories. This pressure is especially damaging for young people who have little alternative. Of course, a certain amount of cohesion is needed, but the scale of the phenomenon we are witnessing is unhealthy.

The isolation of the ITEP theory group had a positive side effect. Everybody, including the youngest members, could afford to work on unfashionable problems without publishing a single line for a year or two. On the other hand, it was considered indecent to publish results of dubious novelty, incomplete results, or just papers with too many words per given number of formulae.

Dense papers were the norm. This style, probably perceived by readers as a chain of riddles, is partly explained by tradition, presumably dating back to the Landau times. It was also due to Soviet conditions, where everything was regulated, including the maximal number of pages any given paper could have.

CERN finalizes new agreement with ISTC

A collaboration agreement between CERN and the International Science and Technology Centre, finalized in November and worth some 12 million Swiss francs, is a large step forward in CERN-ISTC co-operation. The proposed agreement covers equipment for the big ATLAS and CMS experiments. From 2005 these experiments will use CERN’s new LHC proton collider. The agreement is within the framework of the ISTC Partnership Project (more next month). Contributions to all such ISTC projects had previously amounted to about $14 million and the new CERN projects add some $8 million to this sum.

The lion’s share of this new co-operative effort goes towards the lead tungsten crystals for the CMS experiment’s electromagnetic calorimeter. ISTC scientists will also deliver the huge wheels (24 m in diameter) to support the muon chambers on the outside of the ATLAS experiment. This mutually profitable new avenue for research and development work should lead to fresh proposals and contracts.

Heidelberg merger forms Kirchhoff Institute

cernnews4_2-00

The former Institutes for High-Energy Physics and for Applied Physics at the University of Heidelberg have recently joined forces to become the new Kirchhoff Institute for Physics. The Institute was named after Gustav Robert Kirchhoff who carried out his fundamental work on radiation laws and spectral analysis in Heidelberg more than 100 years ago.

At the formal inauguration on 2 November 1999, Kirchhoff Institute director Karlheinz Meier presented an overview of the wide spectrum of teaching and research. These activities cover pure research areas like experimental particle physics and low-temperature physics as well as applications and interdisciplinary work in biophysics, medical physics, microelectronics and computer science. The new institute is participating in a couple of particle physics experiments at DESY and CERN. It also hosts the Heidelberg ASIC integrated circuit laboratory founded and operated by three physics institutes in Heidelberg.

The merger has already initiated fruitful co-operations between applied and pure science. Particle physicists have developed microelectronic light sensor chips with fast integrated-signal processing, for applications in ophthalmology, based on experience with particle physics detectors. The low temperature group, lead by Siegfried Hunklinger, detects very low-energy photons, with unprecedented resolution, using a magnetic probe at very low temperatures.

The Kirchhoff Institute employs about 120 people in two separate buildings. The inauguration was preceded by the laying of the foundation stone for a new institute building, to be equipped with modern infrastructure: cleanroom facilities, experimental halls, workshops and lecture halls. The building should be complete in the summer of 2002.

Alcatel merges with AHTS

Alcatel has signed the final agreement to take control of the superconductivity activities of Aventis Research & Technologies, a subsidiary of Hoechst.

Through this agreement, Alcatel acquires the know-how of Aventis High-Temperature Superconductivity (AHTS) in the design and production of superconductor materials. Thus, Alcatel adds an existing industrial and commercial entity to its significant research and development capacity.

This integration should give the Group the ability to offer the entire superconductor wire production range (from raw materials up to transformation processes), to improve synergy between the various R&D teams and, as a result, achieve production of excellent, high-performance wires and bulk parts.

The activities of Aventis take place in Hurth, near Cologne, where all the industrial equipment is installed.

Elementary Particles and the Laws of Physics

by Richard P Feynman and Steven Weinberg, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0 521 658622 4 (110pp, pbk £9.95/$11.95)

9780521658621

The text of the 1986 Dirac Memorial Lectures, long available as a slim hardback, is now available in paperback. Feynman dismantles field theory to find the real reason for the existence of antiparticles, then puts the theory together again. Weinberg’s compelling prose “Towards the final laws of physics” examines how quantum physics can be reconciled with gravity. Over a decade later, the messages in these lectures remain fresh.

Handbook of Accelerator Physics and Engineering

edited by Alexander Chao and Maury Tigner, World Scientific ISBN 981 02 3500 3 (hbk £58, pbk £32).

51sxu02YmdL

World Scientific approached Alex Chao some four years ago and asked if he would be willing to do a book for them. Chao had the idea for some sort of handbook and got in touch with me to ask if I would be interested in joining him. In the course of making that decision we explored many ideas. One approach was that we should write it ourselves. The other route involved trying to convince the real experts in the community to share their wisdom.

It soon became clear that the only economically feasible way of carrying this out was as a community project and a labour of love. No book royalties could possibly repay the kind of effort that would be required of more than 200 authors.

A key feature is that the money goes to the two accelerator schools (at CERN and in the US) for fellowships for students from institutions that are unable to support them. I’m sure this made the difference to many of the authors who toiled after hours and on weekends to meet our strict deadlines.

Having decided to go that way, we compiled a “straw man” table of contents and sent it around to many of those that we hoped would contribute, together with suggestions on which topic(s) we hoped they would write on. To our great joy and surprise, most agreed and we were off.

We tried to be very precise about the level, style and length of articles and, by and large, the authors entered into the spirit of the thing. Even with the best of wills, however, it was impossible for everyone to keep to their space allotment and we had an enormous amount of work to help the authors cut back.

Space was felt to be very important as we insisted that the book should be portable in emulation of previous outstanding examples. Other considerations included uniform notation and style (at which we were only partly successful). The final text is about half the total of the original submissions.

Naturally, now that the work of four years and thousands of person-hours has borne its fruit, we have had many suggestions for improvement. Some of these suggestions and corrections have already appeared on a special Web page.

Maybe someday there will be another edition in which all of these contributed ideas and corrections can be incorporated. At any rate, we profoundly hope that the book will prove useful and stand as an example of the underlying unity of our community and what can be done when there is a will.

Heavy Water and the Wartime Race for Nuclear Energy

by Per F Dahl, Institute of Physics Publishing 0 7503 0633 5 (£35).

41pU1ddV8YL._SX313_BO1,204,203,200_

Per Dahl is a physicist who has made significant contributions to the design and development of superconducting magnets for particle accelerators. He also has a burning interest in the history of modern science. It is not surprising that he has already written a book on the history of superconductivity (1992 Superconductivity: Its Historical Roots and Development from Mercury to the Ceramic Oxides American Institute of Physics).

Continuing on his history beat, Dahl is also the author of The Flash of the Cathode Rays (1997 Institute of Physics Publishing). Advertised as a history of J J Thomson’s electron, it is in fact a careful documentation (with nearly 100 pages of footnotes) of many other developments in fundamental physics, from time immemorial up to the early 1930s, where the book stops. Dahl is also the son of CERN pioneer and colourful Norwegian scientific personality Odd Dahl (1898­1994).

In Dahl’s new book, heavy water is the hero of a saga that unfolds where Dahl’s previous book left off, and it continues up to 1945. In the early 1940s, just after the discovery of nuclear fission, many people were convinced that heavy water was the key to new nuclear physics progress. With little of the substance around, attention was soon focused on Norway, which had an abundance of hydroelectric power for manufacturing processes.

With the outbreak of the Second World War, both sides were eager to get a supply of heavy water and to prevent it from falling into enemy hands. In 1940 the French cornered 185 kg of Norwegian deuterium, which was spirited to Paris via the UK in an elaborately planned operation. With the invasion of France, the heavy water had to be smuggled out again. It eventually found a temporary home in Windsor Castle, England, before being used in wartime Cambridge and then in Montreal, with Lew Kowarski and Hans von Halban playing leading roles.

In 1942 and 1943, allied commando raids and air strikes on the heavy-water plant in occupied Norway attempted to put the factory out of business. This culminated in the famous 1944 Norwegian Resistance operation, which intercepted a ferry carrying tons of deuterium-rich material en route to Germany and sank it in Lake Tinnsjø. Eighteen lives were lost. In 1965 the episode was made into a film called The Heroes of Telemark, which starred Kirk Douglas.

Dahl manages to combine scientific accuracy with a compelling storyline that keeps the pages turning. Like his cathode-ray book, the volume is meticulously researched, particularly with regards to Norway (although this time the footnotes have been abridged to a mere 57 pages). It is a remarkable read.

CPT and Lorentz Symmetry

edited by V Alan Kostelecky, World Scientific, ISBN 981 02 3926 2 (£36).

9789810239268

These are the proceedings of a meeting held at Bloomington, Indiana, November 1998, which look at the underlying space­time symmetries of particle physics.

Spectral Asymptotics in the Semi-Classical Limit

by M Dimnassi and J Sjöstrand ISBN 0 521 66544 2 (pbk £24.92/$39.95)

9780521665445

This volume is part of the London Mathematical Society Lecture Note series.

The New World of Mr Tompkins

by George Gamow and Russell Stannard, Cambridge, ISBN 0 521 63009 6 (hbk £14.95).

books1_11-99

George Gamow was a sort of prototype Richard Feynman ­ gifted, incisive, exuberant, unpredictable and occasionally eccentric. Feynman played bongo drums and opened safes, while Gamow preferred conjuring. Born in Russia in 1904, Gamow gradually emigrated westwards via Göttingen, Copenhagen, Cambridge, Paris and London. He eventually moved to the US in 1934. Gamow left a substantial scientific and literary legacy.

After milestone contributions to nuclear physics (which included the Gamow­Teller coupling), at Göttingen he explained the mystery of alpha radioactivity, showing how quantum tunnelling allowed low-energy particles to escape the pull of the nucleus. When Gamow brought these insights to Cambridge, Rutherford and Cockcroft realized that what goes out can also come in. In a kind of reverse radioactivity, relatively low-energy bombarding particles should be able to enter the nucleus and induce nuclear transformations. From the late 1920s, this motivated the push for particle accelerators.

Working with his student, Ralph Alpher, in Washington in the 1940s, Gamow learned that the young Hans Bethe was visiting the US and invited him to add his name to the famous “Alpher, Bethe, Gamow” papers on the origin of the chemical elements. In the late 1940s, Gamow also helped to develop the ideas that are now known as the Big Bang.

In 1938 he wrote a short science fantasy (being careful not to call it science fiction), in which he tried to explain the ideas of the relativistic curvature of space and the expanding universe. The hero of his story was a modest bank clerk called C G H Tompkins. His initials were borrowed from the standard physics notation for the speed of light, the gravitational constant and Planck’s constant.

After sending the piece to several large circulation magazines and receiving impersonal rejection slips, Gamow put it to one side until his physicist friend, Sir Charles Darwin (the grandson of the author of The Origin of Species), suggested sending it to C P Snow, then the editor of Discovery magazine, published by Cambridge University Press. The text was immediately accepted and the discerning Snow demanded more.

Mr Tompkins tries valiantly to follow dry science lectures, but easily falls asleep. However, all becomes clear in his vivid dreams. Soon the articles were collected into Mr Tompkins in Wonderland, published in 1940, followed by Mr Tompkins Explores the Atom in 1944. Each was a major success and the two volumes were reissued with additional material as a single volume in 1965. This reissue alone was reprinted some 20 times.

Thirty years after this revision, the book was still selling* but was seriously out of date. With Gamow no longer available (he died in 1968), UK physicist Russell Stannard, author of the well-known “Uncle Albert” trilogy (The Time and Space of Uncle Albert, Black Holes and Uncle Albert and Uncle Albert and the Quantum Quest), was invited to give Mr Tompkins a facelift. As well as updating the science to include quarks, the Standard Model and supersymmetry, Stannard has also tried to modernize the text. For example, the title of Gamow’s chapter 10 ­ “The gay tribe of electrons” ­ had acquired another connotation over the years and has become “The merry tribe of electrons”. An additional chapter ­ “Visiting the atom smasher” ­ provides an opportunity to introduce a politically correct female spokesperson (however, she is depicted as unfeminine and wearing a white coat).

Although concepts are gently introduced, ultimately there is little attempt to paraphrase. A 120-entry glossary, extending over 10 pages, has been thoughtfully provided.

Tompkins is a moot figure. Although he no longer exclaims “By jove!”, he seems to have got stuck in a time warp. The original illustrations, revised by Gamow for the 1965 reissue, did have a certain charm. Although the pictures have been redrawn for 1999, the original style remains. Mild-mannered Tompkins is still supposed to be in his 30s but looks like a refugee from a Tintin episode. Already a dweeb in the original version, now he is an anachronism. Perhaps it is time for “The World of the New Mr Tompkins” in “now-speak”, where the Internet exists and where dog-eared flip charts have been discarded in favour of Powerpoint displays.

However, the Tompkins character evokes sympathy, and the impressive literary track record of George Gamow and of Russell Stannard shows that packaging basic physics with a veneer of personification and anecdote via dreams and thought bubbles does work.

*The 1965 reissue is available as Mr Tompkins in paperback by George Gamow, Cambridge, ISBN 0 521 44771 2 (£7.95).

bright-rec iop pub iop-science physcis connect