Bluefors – leaderboard other pages

Topics

The Golden Age of Theoretical Physics

by Jagdish Mehra, World Scientific, ISBN 9810243421, two-volume set £56.

51u9jcu4iuL._SX347_BO1,204,203,200_

Jagdish Mehra has spent much of his long career carefully documenting the development of quantum mechanics and the people involved. One of the results is his monumental work (with Helmut Rechenberg) The Historical Development of Quantum Theory. The six-volume/nine-book series, completed last year, is imposing. His other contributions include the collected works of Eugene Wigner; books on Einstein, Hilbert and general relativity; and the more popular The Beat of a Different Drum, a biography of Richard Feynman.

His new collection brings together 37 essays, based on his invited lectures, mostly covering modern physics – relativity, quantum theory and quantum mechanics, spin and statistics, quantum electrodynamics, elementary particles – and physicists – Einstein, Planck, Gibbs, Bohr, Sommerfeld, Bose, de Broglie, Pauli, Heisenberg, Dirac, Schrödinger, Wigner and Landau.

Mehra is a scientists’ historian who understands concepts and traces their evolution, as well as the personalities involved.

In the introduction to the book, he explains his own fascination with literature, philosophy and history and his quest to reconcile these with his solid grounding in physical science.

Language was no barrier at Budapest conference

cernnews4-10-01

This year’s venue for the European Physical Society’s biennial Europhysics Conference on High-Energy Physics was the new campus of Eotvos University in Budapest, Hungary. From 41 countries, nearly 600 registered participants and more than 100 registered “accompanying persons” attended the scientific and social events.

As well as the traditional parallel and plenary sessions with all of the physics developments (most of which have already been reported in CERN Courier), the meeting included several innovations. One was an open session of the European Committee of Future Accelerators (ECFA) in which ECFA chairman Lorenzo Foa presented the draft of an ECFA report on the future of European accelerator-based particle physics. Another innovation came when many outsiders were attracted to talks by two leading Hungarian high-energy physicists. To avoid language difficulties, the talks were presented in parallel, one in Hungarian, and the other in English. Julius Kuti (UC San Diego and an external member of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences) spoke on the cosmic significance of particle physics and Teraflop computing. Alex Szalay (Johns Hopkins and a member of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences) gave a talk on megamaps of the universe.

cernnews5-10-01

The next conference in the series will be held in Aachen, Germany, in 2003.

The proceedings of the Budapest conference will be published exclusively in electronic form by JHEP.

Asia programme offers postgraduate grants

Within the framework of the CERN-Asia Fellows and Associates programme, CERN offers three grants every year to young east, south-east and south Asia* postgraduates under the age of 33, enabling them to participate in its scientific programme in the areas of experimental and theoretical physics and accelerator technologies. The appointment is for one year, which might exceptionally be extended to two years.

Applications will be considered by the CERN Fellowship Selection Committee at its meeting on 29 January 2002. An application must consist of a completed application form, on which should be written “CERN-Asia Programme”; three separate reference letters; and a curriculum vitae including a list of scientific publications and any other information regarding the quality of the candidate. Applications, references and any other information must be provided in English only.

Applications should reach the Recruitment Office at CERN before 5 November 2001. Application forms can be obtained from the Recruitment Service, CERN, Human Resources Division, 1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland; e-mail Recruitment.Service @cern.ch; fax +41 22 767 2750.

The CERN-Asia Fellows and Associates programme also offers a few short-term associateship positions to scientists aged under 40 who wish to spend a fraction of the year at CERN or a Japanese laboratory and who are “on leave of absence” from their institute. Applications are accepted from scientists who are nationals of the east, south east and south Asian* countries and from CERN researchers who are nationals of a CERN member state.

*Candidates are accepted from the east, south-east and south Asian countries of Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Brunei, Cambodia, China, India, Indonesia, Japan, Korea, the Laos Republic, Malaysia, the Maldives, Mongolia, Myanmar, Nepal, Pakistan, the Philippines, Singapore, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Thailand and Vietnam.

Accelerator prizes

US Particle Accelerator School prizes for Achievement in Accelerator Physics and Technology for this year went to Tor Raubenheimer of SLAC, Stanford and Dieter Moehl of CERN.

Raubenheimer received the award for the development of emittance control techniques for high-performance electron-positron linear collider and storage rings, and for his leadership role in the development of a second generation linear collider.

Moehl was honoured for his outstanding contributions to beam cooling and to counteracting intensity limitations, and for his impact on the conception, design and operation of low-energy storage rings for ions and antiprotons.

The prizes were awarded at the 2001 Particle Accelerator Conference in Chicago.

The international jigsaw puzzle

cernlhc1_9-01

The Large Hadron Collider, which is now under construction in CERN’s 27 km ring tunnel, attracts significant contributions from several major nations outside the CERN member state community, making it truly a world machine.

In addition to these important contributions from Canada, India, Japan, Russia and the US, CERN host states France and Switzerland also contribute significant additional resources to the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) above and beyond their natural involvement as part of the 20-nation European CERN community.

Canada

The contribution to the LHC from Canada is valued at C$40 million, much of which is used for hardware to help to upgrade the injector chain, particularly the Booster and the PS synchrotron. This involvement goes back to 1995 and is coordinated by the Canadian TRIUMF laboratory.

Equipment includes ferrite rings and the tuning and high-voltage power supplies for four new radiofrequency cavities for the Booster, which was upgraded from 1 to 1.4 GeV specifically for its new role in the LHC injector chain.

Canadian contributions also include most of the magnets and power supplies for the transfer line between the Booster and the PS, major equipment for the Booster main magnet power supply, and a reactive power compensator to reduce Booster-induced transients on CERN’s electrical supply system.

A second wave of Canadian contribution is mainly for the LHC ring, including 52 twin-aperture quadrupole magnets for “beam cleaning” insertions, together with power suplies for kicker magnets, pulse-forming networks and switches.

Canada will also develop beam-position monitor electronics and carry out some beam optics studies.

India

The initial CERN-India co-operation agreement was signed in 1991 and is renewed every five years. The value of equipment covered is $25 million, of which half is transferred by CERN into a special fund to underwrite further joint ventures.

The main Indian hardware contribution is superconducting sextupole and decapole spool pieces amounting to half of the total LHC requirement for such corrector magnet equipment. In addition, India will supply LHC magnet support jacks and quench heater power supplies.

Circuit breakers are being supplied by Russia, but India remains responsible for the necessary electronics. In addition, India is carrying out several programming and documentation projects.

Japan

Japan’s early entry into the LHC arena in 1995 provided a memorable boost for the project. Japanese contributions currently total approximately ¥13,850 million (some SFr 160 million). Of this sum, some SFr 25 million was earmarked for constructing of the solenoid magnet for the ATLAS experiment (May p8).

The KEK national laboratory acts as a major coordinator for all of this work. Japan is the source of much of the basic material (steel and superconducting cable) for the LHC.

A further significant Japanese contribution to the LHC is the 16 quadrupoles used to squeeze the colliding beams and boost the interaction rate. Also on the list of equipment are compressors for cooling superfluid helium.

cernlhc3_9-01

Russia

The contribution of the Russian Federation to the LHC machine is valued at SFr 100 million. One-third is channelled into a special fund for CERN-Russian collaboration.

The largest and most visible part of this contribution is the thousands of tonnes of magnets and equipment for the beamlines to link the SPS synchrotron to the LHC. The supply of this equipment from Novosibirsk will soon be complete. Novosibirsk is also supplying insertion magnets for the LHC ring.

The Protvino laboratory is responsible for 18 extraction magnets and the circuit breakers that will receive the electronics from India. The Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, is contributing a damping system, and a number of other Russian research centres will furnish a range of items and equipment, including design work, radiation studies, survey targets, ceramic components, busbars and shielding.

USA

Work in the US for the LHC centres on interaction regions 1, 2, 5 and 8, together with some radiofrequency equipment for Point 4. The work is shared between the Brookhaven, Fermilab and Lawrence Berkeley National laboratories.

The impressive list of contributed hardware includes superconducting quadrupoles and their cryostats for beam intersections (Fermilab), superconducting dipoles for beam separation (Brookhaven) and cryogenic feed boxes (Berkeley).

The beam insertion hardware overlaps with that from Japan, and there has been excellent co-operation on LHC contributions between these two industrial giant nations.

cernlhc2_9-01

Host nations

France and Switzerland, as CERN host nations, make special contributions to the LHC. For France, this includes 218 person-years of work, spread over four major technical agreements, covering the cold mass for LHC short straight sections (handled by the CEA Atomic Energy Commission), the short straight section cryostats and assembly (by the CNRS national research agency), calibration of 8000 thermometers for the LHC (by the Orsay laboratory), and design and series fabrication work for the superfluid helium refrigeration system (CEA).

In addition to this national involvement, the local Rhone-Alpes regional government and the départements of Ain and Haute-Savoie also contribute.

Under the regional government plan, about 90 person-years of assistance will be supplied by young graduates of technical and engineering universities. Haute-Savoie contributes design work on the integration of microelectronics for the LHC cryogenic system.

In addition, the LAPP laboratory at Annecy is developing ultrasonic equipment to monitor superconducting dipole interconnections, and it is doing design work for the vacuum chambers of the major LHC experiments. Ain has contributed the land to build a major new construction and assembly hall next to the CERN site.

The Swiss contribution comes from the federal government and the canton of Geneva, and it covers the cost of a 2.5 km tunnel through which protons will be fed from the SPS to the LHC in the anticlockwise direction.

For the major physics detectors, scientists are used to seeing major equipment being built piecewise in an international jigsaw puzzle, but the LHC machine, too, is taking on such a character.

A path to international contributions was pioneered by the HERA electron-proton collider at DESY, Hamburg, in the 1980s.

For HERA, Canada, France, Italy and the Netherlands supplied components, Israel and the US contributed technological development, and person power came from China, Poland and the UK.

Enrico Fermi: genius and giant of science

cernann1_9-01

Enrico Fermi was born on 29 September 1901 in Rome to a family with no scientific traditions. His passion for natural sciences, and in particular for physics, was stimulated and guided in his school years by an engineer and family friend, Adolph Amidei, who recognized Fermi’s exceptional intellectual abilities and suggested admission to Pisa’s Scuola Normale Superiore.

After finishing high-school studies in Rome, in 1918 Fermi progressed to the prestigious Pisa Institute, after producing for the admission exam an essay on the characteristics of the propagation of sound, the authenticity of which the commissioners initially refused to believe.

Studies at Pisa did not pose any particular difficulties for the young Fermi, despite his having to be largely self-taught using material in foreign languages because nothing existed at the time in Italian on the new physics emerging around relativity and quantum theory. In those years in Italy, these new theories were absent from university teaching, and only mathematicians like Tullio Levi-Civita had the knowledge and insight to see their implications.

Working alone, between 1919 and 1922, Fermi built up a solid competence in relativity, statistical mechanics and the applications of quantum theory to such a degree that by 1920 the institute director, Luigi Puccianti, invited him to establish a series of seminars on quantum physics.

cernann2_9-01

First published work

Even before taking any formal examinations, Fermi published his first important scientific work – a contribution to the theory of general relativity in which he introduced a particular system of coordinates that went on to become standard as Fermi coordinates – the beginning of a long series of scientific contributions and concepts associated with his name.

At Pisa, Fermi strengthened a friendship with Franco Rasetti and maintained scientific contact with his former high-school companion, Enrico Persico. In parallel with his outstanding ability in theoretical physics, Fermi developed a genuine feeling for experimental investigation, acquiring with Rasetti in the institute’s laboratory, which was put at their disposition by Puccianti, an excellent acquaintance with the techniques of X-ray diffraction. It was on this subject that Fermi carried out work for his bachelor dissertation, which he eventually presented in July 1922.

cernann3_9-01

After his bachelor’s work, Fermi returned to Rome where he came in contact with Physics Institute director Orso Mario Corbino. Corbino succeeded in obtaining a scholarship for Fermi, which Fermi then used to finance a six-month stay in 1923 at Max Born’s school in Göttingen. Although this school probably had at the time the most progressive ideas towards the final formulation of quantum mechanics, Fermi did not find his stay particularly comfortable. The school’s excessive formal theoretical hypotheses, devoid of physical meaning, around which Born, Heisenberg, Jordan and Pauli were working, were not to his taste, and he preferred to work alone on some problems of analytical mechanics and statistical mechanics.

More intellectually stimulating, and fertile for scientific results, was Fermi’s second foreign visit one year later, thanks to a Rockefeller Foundation scholarship. From September to December 1924, Fermi worked at Leiden, at the institute directed by Paul Ehrenfest, where he found a much more congenial scientific atmosphere.

Between 1923 and 1925, Fermi published important contributions to quantum theory that culminated at the beginning of 1926 in the formulation of the antisymmetric statistics that are now universally known under the name Fermi-Dirac. In this fundamental work, Fermi took to their conclusion ideas that he had began to develop in Leiden on the statistical mechanics of an identical particle system, introducing the selection rule (Exclusion Principle) introduced by Pauli at the beginning of 1925, so as to construct a satisfactory theory of the behaviour of particles henceforth called fermions.

The far-sighted initiatives of Orso Mario Corbino for developing Italian physics bore their first fruits. In 1926 Corbino established a competitive chair of theoretical physics in Rome (the first of its kind in Italy), as a result of which Fermi gained a professorship at the institute in the via Panisperna at the age of 25.

The following September a major international physics convention took place in Como for a Volta commemoration.

cernann4_9-01

It was during this convention that a demonstration, which was carried out by Sommerfeld and others, of the effectiveness of the new quantum statistics for the understanding of hitherto insoluble problems, ensured Fermi’s international reputation.

At the institute on the via Panisperna, a new collaboration began to take shape around Fermi and Rasetti at the beginning of 1927, as Corbino selected a group of promising young people. These included Edoardo Amaldi and Emilio Segrè.

By the end of the 1920s the “via Panisperna boys” switched from studying atomic and molecular spectroscopy to investigating the properties of the atomic nucleus – described by Corbino in a celebrated 1929 speech as the new frontier of physics.

This new line of research reflected Fermi’s growing scientific stature. In 1929 he was the only physicist designated to join the new Royal Academy of Italy. With this, and being secretary of the national physics research committee, he was able to steer funding and resources towards the new fields of research.

Nuclear summer

An important turning point was the first International Conference on Nuclear Physics, which was held in Rome in September 1931, and of which Fermi was both major organizer and scientific inspiration. Here, the main ongoing problems of nuclear physics were examined, which soon went on to be solved, notably in the “anno mirabile” of 1932 with the discovery of the neutron.

In the autumn of 1933, Fermi then added what is possibly his biggest contribution to physics – namely his milestone formulation of the theory of beta decay. In this formulation he took over the hypothesis of the neutrino, which had been postulated several years earlier by Pauli to maintain the validity of energy conservation in beta decay, and he used the idea that the proton and neutron are two different states of the same “fundamental object”, adding the radically new hypothesis that the electron does not pre-exist in the expelled nucleus but is liberated, with the neutrino, in the decay process, in an analogous way to the emission of a quantum of light resulting from an atomic quantum jump.

The theory also fitted in with the new formalism developed by Dirac in his quantum theory of radiation. It is interesting to note that Fermi’s work, which was initially sent to the Nature and was turned down because it was “too abstract and far from the physical reality”, was published elsewhere.

In 1934, nuclear physics research at via Panisperna capitalized on Frederic Joliot and Irene Curie’s discovery of artificial radioactivity. Fermi’s group discovered the radioactivity that is induced by neutrons, instead of the alpha particles of the Paris experiments, and soon they revealed the special properties of slow neutrons.

Sudden departure

Meanwhile the political situation in Italy began to give worrying signs of deterioration. While the major foreign laboratories began to invest in the new accelerators – fundamental machines to produce sources of controlled and intense subnuclear “bullets” to bombard the nuclei – Fermi’s attempts to obtain the necessary resources for an appropriately equipped national laboratory were not successful.

For a number of years, Fermi resisted numerous offers of posts in US universities. Then, in 1938, the promulgation of new racial laws threatened the Fermi family directly (Fermi’s wife, Laura Capon, was Jewish), so he took the decision to leave the country.

The opportunity to emigrate came with Fermi being awarded the Nobel Prize for Physics for his work on artificial radioactivity and slow neutrons. In December 1938 he received the prize in Stockholm and from there embarked with his family for the US and Columbia University in New York. Officially, he went to the US to deliver a series of lectures, but his friends knew that he had no intention of returning.

Wartime involvement

cernann5_9-01

The discovery of nuclear fission and the outbreak of war dramatically highlighted the possible use of nuclear energy for military purposes. With his experience in neutron physics, Fermi was the natural leader for a group to carry out the first phase of a plan that would eventually lead to the atomic bomb – the achievement of a sustained and controlled chain reaction.

The work, which was classified as a military secret, was carried out in the University of Chicago’s Metallurgical Laboratory. In December 1942 the first controlled fission chain reaction was achieved in the reactor constructed under Fermi’s direction. This led in turn to the Manhattan Project, in which Fermi had prominent roles, such as general adviser on theoretical issues, and finally as a member of the small group of scientists (with J Robert Oppenheimer, Ernest Lawrence and Arthur Compton) that was charged with expressing technical opinions on the use of the new nuclear weapon.

In August 1944, Fermi moved to the village-laboratory of Los Alamos for the final development of the bomb, and in July 1945 he was among those who witnessed the first nuclear explosion in the Alamogordo desert.

Return to the laboratory

At the end of the Second World War, Fermi returned to Chicago and resumed his research in fundamental physics, at a time when new subnuclear particles were being discovered and when the new quantum electrodynamics was soon to appear.

In those years he led an influential research group, and a good number of the students associated with the group later went on to win Nobel prizes. The group continues to provide scientific advice for the US government.

Fermi, as a member of the General Advisory Committee, was against development work for a thermonuclear device, but this line met considerable resistance from Edward Teller, who went on, with mathematician Stan Ulam, to carry out much of the necessary theoretical work.

In this new context, Fermi developed an interest in possibilities that were being opened up by electronic computers, and in the early 1950s, in collaboration with Ulam, he carried out fundamental and pioneering work in the computer simulation of nonlinear dynamics.

Fermi returned twice to Italy. In 1949 he participated in a conference on cosmic rays in Como, which was the continuation of a series held earlier in Rome and Milan. Five years later, at the 1954 summer school of the Italian Physical Society in Varenna, he gave a memorable course on pion and nucleon physics.

On return to Chicago from this trip, he underwent surgery for a malignant tumour of the stomach, but he survived only a few weeks, dying on 29 November 1954.

Honouring a name

On 16 November 1954, on hearing that Enrico Fermi’s health had deteriorated, President Eisenhower and the US Atomic Energy Commission gave him a special award for a lifetime of accomplishments in physics and, in particular, for his role in the development of atomic energy. Fermi died soon after, on 29 November.

The Enrico Fermi US Presidential Award was subsequently established in 1956 to perpetuate the memory of Fermi’s brilliance as a scientist and to recognize others of his kind – inspiring others by his example.

Fermi’s memory is also perpetuated in the US through the Enrico Fermi Institute, as the department of the University of Chicago where he used to work is now known, and the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (Fermilab), which was named in his honour in 1974.

* This article was originally published in INFN Notizie, April 2001.

Centenary programme

In Italy the Fermi centenary is being marked by a series of meetings and events:

20 March – 28 April: exhibition on Fermi and Italian physics in Rome at the Ministry for the University and Research

2 July: Fermi, Master and Teacher, organized by the Italian Physical Society, for the opening of the 2001 courses of the Scuola Internazionale di Fisica “Enrico Fermi”, Varenna (Como)

29 September: opening of an exhibition, Enrico Fermi e l‚universo della Fisica, in Rome’s Teatro dei Dioscuri

29 September – 2 October: an international meeting, Enrico Fermi and the Universe of Physics, in Rome

3-6 October: an international meeting, Fermi and Astrophysics, at the International Center for Relativistic Astrophysics (ICRA), Pescara

18-20 October: an international meeting, Enrico Fermi and Modern Physics, organized by the Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa, and Instituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Pisa

18-28 October: an exhibition, Enrico Fermi. Immagini e documenti inediti, organized by the Associazione per la diffusione della cultura scientifica “La Limonaia”, Pisa University’s Department of Physics, the town and local authorities, at the Limonaia di Palazzo Ruschi

22-23 October: a meeting, Enrico Fermi e l’energia nucleare, organized by Pisa University

In November: a meeting, Fermi e la meccanica statistica, organized by Pisa University’s Department of Physics.

In the US: 29 September: a Fermi centenary symposium at the University of Chicago.

Particle Physics and the Universe: Proceedings of the Nobel Symposium, 20-25 August 1998

edited by L Bergström, P Carlson and C Fransson, World Scientific, ISBN 9810244592, 55.

41aIgF7LBiL

This includes a tribute to David Schramm (who died on 19 December 1997) by Michael Turner, and many contributions, then topical, on cosmology and astrophysics, by distinguished people.

Basics and Highlights in Fundamental Physics, Proceedings of the International School of Sunbnuclear Physics

edited by Antonino Zichichi, World Scientific, ISBN 981024536X, 121.

31qoOgKmveL._SX336_BO1,204,203,200_

The record of a school held in Erice, Sicily, in August/September 1999. It is prefaced by tributes to Bjorn Wiik, who died on 26 February 1999, by Kjell Johnsen, Horst Wenninger and Günter Wolf, and it goes on to cover basics, theoretical and experimental highlights, and a special session for new talents. Gerard ‘t Hooft gave the opening lecture on the Holographic Principle.

The Supersymmetric World: The Beginnings of the Theory

edited by G Kane and M Shifman, World Scientific, ISBN 981024522X.

51jnCn7t++L._SX363_BO1,204,203,200_

It is notoriously difficult to write with perspective about the history of science of very recent events. This is particularly true in the case of supersymmetry. Actually, supersymmetry is not at all a recent idea; it is about 30 years old and, when compared with the pace of recent progress in science, it seems to come from another geological era.

Nevertheless, the role of supersymmetry in the description of the physical laws and its destiny in the history of scientific ideas are not yet settled.

Physicists are struck by its mathematical beauty, its trustworthy promises to merge general relativity with the principles of quantum mechanics, and its symmetry properties that allow a coherent description of the vastly hierarchical structure of the relevant size scales of the microworld. Nevertheless, we still lack definite experimental evidence for its existence.

This book does not attempt to present a chronological history of the events that led to the theoretical discovery of supersymmetry and its successive developments. Instead it collects personal reminiscences of the pioneers and founders of supersymmetry. In this way it gives the reader all of the elements necessary to reconstruct his/her own favourite history.

Supersymmetry is by now a familiar concept among both theoretical and experimental particle physicists. Entering an auditorium during a conference or a seminar on high-energy physics and listening to a speaker expounding on the production rates of gluinos and squarks, you certainly get the impression that these particles are real entities with well measured properties. In fact they are just a theoretical conjecture, the confirmation or disproof of which is waiting for the Large Hadron Collider to operate at CERN. But how many people in that auditorium know why supersymmetry was first introduced in particle physics, or how superstrings were invented (by Ramond, Neveu and Schwarz) before supersymmetry was even known, or, in a more anectodal vein, how the name developed from the super-gauge symmetry’ of Wess and Zumino to super-symmetry’ (with the hyphen) of Salam and Strathdee? This book is excellent reading for all of those (in that auditorium or not) who do not know the answers or just want to know more.

In the beginning, supersymmetry was a solution in search of a problem. The first proponents did not have in mind the hierarchy puzzle or quantum gravity, which are the main arguments used now to motivate supersymmetry and which did not appear in scientific literature until the early 1980s. Golfand and Likhtman invented supersymmetry when trying to understand parity-violation in weak interactions (before the Standard Model of electroweak interactions emerged). Volkov and Akulov introduced non linear supersymmetric transformations to explain massless neutrinos (interpreted as Goldstone fermions). Then Wess and Zumino rediscovered supersymmetry on the other side of the Iron Curtain and, with formidable theoretical developments, opened the gate to the superworld.

There is a lot to be learned from the early developments of supersymmetry and this book provides the necessary material in an unusual form – through personal recollections. It has to be said that many of the contributions contain technical discussions of the theoretical progress that require a good scientific knowledge on the part of the reader. However, these are mixed with reminiscences, personal remarks and anecdotes that make the reading more suggestive and captivating.

The book also contains an essay by R Di Stefano that attempts a systematic study of the historical developments of supersymmetry. I found this essay, written in 1988, too dated to have sufficient vision of the field. On the other hand, most contributions from the original founders of supersymmetry are full of interesting remarks, both from scientific and historical points of view. Particularly vivid is the chapter written by Yuri Golfand’s wife, with an intense and passionate portrait of her husband and of the sufferings, injustices and intellectual humiliations borne by the Jews in the Soviet Union.

ICHEP 2000: Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on High-Energy Physics

edited by C S Lim and Taku Yamanaka, World Scientific, ISBN 9810245335, two-volume set 179.

51lSozGZhtL

The record of the symposium held in Osaka on 27 July – 2 August 2000.

bright-rec iop pub iop-science physcis connect