Read article 'In it for the long haul'
In it for the long haul
We have conquered the easiest challenges in fundamental physics, says Nima Arkani-Hamed. The case for building the next major collider is now more compelling than ever.
Read article 'In it for the long haul'
Read article 'Good strategy demands the right balance'
Good strategy demands the right balance
As the second update of the European Strategy for Particle Physics gets under way, Tatsuya Nakada reflects on the experience of the previous update in 2013.
Read article 'Understanding naturalness'
Understanding naturalness
The last few years have seen an explosion of ideas concerning naturalness, but we’re only at the beginning of our understanding, says theorist Nathaniel Craig.
Read article 'Fixing gender in theory'
Fixing gender in theory
It is high time we addressed the low representation of women in high-energy theoretical physics, says Marika Taylor.
Read article 'Quantum thinking required'
Quantum thinking required
There will be no universal quantum computer on which we will be able to compile our C++ code and then magically run it faster, explains Federico Carminati.
Read article 'Preserving European unity in physics'
Preserving European unity in physics
As the EPS turns 50, building scientific bridges across political divides remains as vital as ever, argues Rüdiger Voss.
Read article 'Lessons from the accelerator frontier'
Lessons from the accelerator frontier
Lucio Rossi recounts how, in contrast to the LHC, HL-LHC has been a partnership with other institutions since the very beginning.
Read article 'A golden age for neutrinos'
A golden age for neutrinos
CERN's Albert De Roeck explains how, 20 years since the discovery of neutrino oscillations, a complete understanding is within our grasp.
Read article 'Colliding visions drive success'
Colliding visions drive success
Geoffrey Taylor is chair of the International Committee for Future Accelerators.
Read article 'We need to talk about the Higgs'
We need to talk about the Higgs
Tim Gershon of LHCb argues that apparently harmless academic discussions risk evolving into a negative outlook for the field.
