Jobs – Page 94 of 521

Jack Steinberger 1921–2020

Jack Steinberger, a giant of the field who witnessed and shaped the evolution of particle physics from its beginnings to the confirmation of the Standard Model, passed away on 12 December aged 99. Born in the Bavarian town of Bad Kissingen in 1921, his father was a cantor and religious teacher to the small Jewish community, and his mother gave English and French lessons to supplement the family income. In 1934, after new Nazi laws had excluded Jewish children from higher education, Jack’s parents applied for him and his brother to take part in a charitable scheme that saw 300 German refugee children transferred to the US. Jack found his home as a foster child, and was reunited with his parents and younger brother in 1938.

Jack studied chemistry at the University of Chicago until 1942, when he joined the army and was sent to the MIT radiation laboratory to work on radar bomb sights. He was assigned to the antenna group where his attention was brought to physics. After the war he returned to Chicago to embark on a career in theoretical physics. Under the guidance of Enrico Fermi, however, he switched to the experimental side of the field, conducting mountaintop investigations into cosmic rays. He was awarded a PhD in 1948. Fermi, who was probably Jack’s most influential physics teacher, described him as “direct, confident, without complication, he concentrated on physics, and that was enough”.

In 1949 Steinberger went to the Radiation Lab at the University of California at Berkeley, where he performed an experiment at the electron synchrotron that demonstrated the production of neutral pions and their decay to photon pairs. He stayed only one year in Berkeley, partly because he declined to sign the anti-communist loyalty oath, and moved on to Columbia University.

In the 1960s the construction of a high-energy, high-flux proton accelerator at Brookhaven opened the door to the study of weak interactions using neutrino-beam experiments. This marked the beginning of Jack’s interest in neutrino physics. Along with Mel Schwarz and Leon Lederman, he designed and built the experiment that established the difference between neutrinos associated with muons and those associated with electrons, for which they received the 1988 Nobel Prize in Physics.

He was a curious and imaginative physicist with an extraordinary rigour

Jack joined CERN in 1968, working on experiments at the Proton Synchrotron exploring CP violation in neutral kaons. In the 1970s, with the advent of new neutrino beams at the Super Proton Synchrotron, Jack became a founding member of the CERN–Dortmund–Heidelberg–Saclay (CDHS) collaboration. Running from 1976 to 1984, CDHS produced a string of important results using neutrino beams to probe the structure of the nucleon and the Standard Model in general. In particular, the collaboration confirmed the predicted variation of the structure function of the valence quarks with Q² (nicknamed “scaling violations”), a milestone in the establishment of QCD.

When the Large Electron–Positron (LEP) collider was first proposed, a core group from CDHS joined physicists from other institutions to develop a detector for CERN’s new flagship collider. This initiative grew into the ALEPH experiment, and Jack, a curious and imaginative physicist with an extraordinary rigour, was the natural choice to become its first spokesperson in 1980, a position he held until 1990. From the outset, he stipulated that standard solutions should be adopted across the whole detector as far as possible. This led to the end-caps reflecting the design of the central detector, for example. Jack was also insistent that all technologies considered for the detector first had to be completely understood. As the LEP era got underway, this level of discipline was reflected in ALEPH’s results.

Next to physics, music formed an important part of Jack’s life. He organised gatherings of amateur, and occasionally professional, musicians at his house. These were usually marathons of Bach, starting in the late afternoon and continuing until the late evening. In his autobiography, Jack summarised: “I play the flute, unfortunately not very well, and have enjoyed tennis, mountaineering and sailing, passionately.”

Jack retired from CERN in 1986 and went on to become a professor at the Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa. President Ronald Reagan awarded him the National Medal of Science in 1988. In 2001, on the occasion of his 80th birthday, the city of Bad Kissingen named its gymnasium in his honour. Jack continued his association with CERN throughout his 90s. He leaves his mark not just on particle physics but on all of us who had the opportunity to collaborate with him.

Accelerating talent at CERN

**Engineering prowess** Natalia Magdalena Koziol, an engineer from Poland, is responsible for quality assurance of the LHC’s insulation vacuum during Long Shutdown 2. Credit: N Caraban/CERN-PHOTO-202011-160-91

CERN enjoys a world-class reputation as a scientific laboratory, with the start-up of the Large Hadron Collider and the discovery of the Higgs boson propelling the organisation into the public spotlight. Less tangible and understood by the public, however, is that to achieve this level of success in cutting-edge research, you need the infrastructure and tools to perform it. CERN is an incredible hub for engineering and technology – hosting a vast complex of accelerators, detectors, experiments and computing infrastructure. Thus, CERN needs to attract candidates from across a wide spectrum of engineering and technical disciplines to fulfil its objectives.

CERN employs around 2600 staff members who design, build, operate, maintain and support an infrastructure used by a much larger worldwide community of physicists. Of these, only 3% are research physicists. The core hiring needs are for engineers, technicians and support staff in a wide variety of domains: mechanical, electrical, engineering, vacuum, cryogenics, civil engineering, radiation protection, radiofrequency, computing, software, hardware, data acquisition, materials science, health and safety… the list goes on. Furthermore, there are also competences needed in human resources, legal matters, communications, knowledge transfer, finance, firefighters, medical professionals and other support functions.

On the radar

CERN’s hiring challenge takes on even greater meaning when one considers the drive to attract students, graduates and professionals from across CERN’s 32 Member and Associate Member States. In what is already a competitive market, attracting people from a large multitude of disciplines to an organisation whose reputation revolves around particle physics can be a challenge. So how is this challenge tackled? CERN now has a well-established “employer brand”, developed in 2010 to promote its opportunities in an increasingly digitalised environment. The brand centres around factors that make working at CERN the rich experience that it is, namely challenge, purpose, imagination, collaboration, integrity and quality of life – underpinned by the slogan “Take part”. This serves as an identity to devise attractive campaigns through web content, video, online, social media and job-portal advertisements to promote CERN as an employer of choice to the audiences we seek to reach: from students to professionals, apprenticeships to PhDs, across all diversity dimensions. The intention is to put CERN “on the radar” of people who wouldn’t normally identify CERN as a possibility in their chosen career path.

CERN doesn’t just bring together people from a large scope of fields but unites people from all over the world

As no single channel exists that will allow targeting of, for example, a mechanical technician in all CERN Member States, creative and innovative approaches have to be utilised. The varying landscapes, cultural preferences and languages come into play, and this is compounded by the different job-seeking behaviours of students, graduates and experienced professionals through a constantly evolving ecosystem of channels and solutions. A widespread presence is key. The cornerstones are: an attractive careers website; professional networks such as LinkedIn to promote CERN’s employment opportunities and proactively search for candidates; social media to increase visibility of hiring campaigns; and being present on various job portals, for example in the oil, gas and energy arenas. Outreach events, presence at university career fairs and online webinars further serve to present CERN and its diverse opportunities to the targeted audiences.

Storytelling is an essential ingredient in promoting our opportunities, as are the experiences of those already working at CERN. In the words of Håvard, an electromechanical technician from Norway: “I get to challenge myself in areas and with technology you don’t see any other place in the world.” Gunnar, a firefighter from Germany describes, “I am working as a firefighter in one of the most international fire brigades at CERN in what is a very complex, challenging and interesting environment.” Katarina, a computing engineer from Sweden, says, “The diversity of skills needed at CERN is so much larger than what most people know!” While Julia, a former mechanical engineering technical student from the UK put it simply: “I never knew that CERN recruited students for internships.” Natasha, a former software engineering fellow from Pakistan, summed it up with, “Here I am, living my dreams, being a part of an organisation that’s helping me grow every single day.” Each individual experience is a rich insight for potential candidates to identify with and recognise the possibility of joining CERN in their own right.

CERN doesn’t just bring together people from a large scope of fields but unites people from all over the world. Working as summer, technical or doctoral student, as a graduate or professional, builds skills and knowledge that are highly transferable in today’s demanding and competitive job market, along with lasting connections. As the cherry on the cake, a job at CERN paves the way to become CERN’s future alumni and join the ever-growing High-Energy Network. Take part!

Quantum sensing for particle physics

AION’s 10 m stage — **Physics in the pipeline** AION’s initial 10 m stage is hoped to be followed by 100 m and km-scale facilities. Credit: AION/RAL

A particle physics-led experiment called AION (Atomic Interferometric Observatory and Network) is one of several multidisciplinary projects selected for funding by the UK’s new Quantum Technologies for Fundamental Physics programme. The successful projects, announced in January following a £31 million call for proposals from UK Research and Innovation (UKRI), will exploit recent advances in quantum technologies to tackle outstanding questions in fundamental physics, astrophysics and cosmology.

We have an opportunity to change the way we search for answers to some of the biggest mysteries of the universe
Mark Thomson

UKRI and university funding of about £10 million (UKRI part £7.2 million) will enable the AION team to prepare the construction of a 10 m-tall atomic interferometer at the University of Oxford to explore ultra-light dark matter and provide a pathway towards detecting gravitational waves in the unexplored mid-frequency band ranging from several mHz to a few Hz. The setup will use lasers to drive transitions between the ground and excited states of a cloud of cold strontium atoms in free fall, effectively acting as beam splitters and mirrors for the atomic de Broglie waves (see figure). Ultralight dark matter and exotic light bosons would be expected to have differential effects on the atomic transition frequencies, while a passing gravitational wave would generate a strain in the space through which the atoms fall freely. Either would create a difference between the phases of atomic beams following different paths – the greater their separations, the greater the sensitivity of the experiment.

“AION is a uniquely interdisciplinary mission that will harness cold-atom quantum technologies to address key issues in fundamental physics, astrophysics and cosmology that can be realised in the next few decades,” says AION principal investigator Oliver Buchmueller of Imperial College London, who is also a member of the CMS collaboration. “The AION project will also significantly contribute to MAGIS, a 100 m-scale partner experiment being prepared at Fermilab, and we are exploring the possibility of utilising a shaft in the UK or at the LHC for a similar second 100 m detector.”

Six other quantum-technology projects involving UK institutes are under way thanks to the UKRI scheme. One, led by experimental particle physicist Ruben Saakyan of University College London, will use ultra-precise B-field mapping and microwave spectrometry to determine the absolute neutrino mass in tritium beta-decay beyond the 0.2 eV sensitivity projected for the KATRIN experiment. Others include the use of new classes of detectors and coherent quantum amplifiers to search for hidden structure in the vacuum state; the development of ultra-low-noise quantum electronics to underpin searches for axions and other light hidden particles; quantum simulators to mimic the extreme conditions of the early universe and black holes; and the development of quantum-enhanced superfluid technologies for cosmology.

The UKRI call is part of a global effort to develop quantum technologies that could bring about a “second quantum revolution”. Several major international public and private initiatives are under way. Last autumn, CERN launched its own quantum technologies initiative.

“With the application of emerging quantum technologies, I believe we have an opportunity to change the way we search for answers to some of the biggest mysteries of the universe,” said Mark Thomson, executive chair of the UK’s Science and Technology Facilities Council. “These include exploring what dark matter is made of, finding the absolute mass of neutrinos and establishing how quantum mechanics fits with gravity.”

Iodine aerosol production could accelerate Arctic melting

Researchers at CERN’s CLOUD experiment have uncovered a new mechanism that could accelerate the loss of Arctic sea ice. In a paper published in Science on 5 February, the team showed that aerosol particles made of iodic acid can form extremely rapidly in the marine boundary layer – the portion of the atmosphere that is in direct contact with the ocean. Aerosol particles are important for the climate because they provide the seeds on which cloud droplets form. Marine new-particle formation is especially important since particle concentrations are low and the ocean is vast. However, how new aerosol particles form and influence clouds and climate remain relatively poorly understood.

In polar regions, aerosols and clouds have a warming effect because they absorb infrared radiation otherwise lost to space and then radiate it back down to the surface
Jasper Kirkby

“Our measurements are the first to show that the part-per-trillion-by-volume iodine levels found in marine regions will lead to rapid formation and growth of iodic acid particles,” says CLOUD spokesperson Jasper Kirkby of CERN, adding that the particle formation rate is also strongly enhanced by ions from galactic cosmic rays. “Although most atmospheric particles form from sulphuric acid, our study shows that iodic acid – which is produced by the action of sunlight and ozone on molecular iodine emitted by the sea surface, sea ice and exposed seaweed – may be the main driver in pristine marine regions.”

CLOUD is a one-of-a kind experiment that uses an ultraclean cloud chamber to measure the formation and growth of aerosol particles from a mixture of vapours under precisely controlled atmospheric conditions, including the use of a high-energy beam from the Proton Synchrotron to simulate cosmic rays up to the top of the troposphere. Last year, the team found that small inhomogeneities in the concentrations of ammonia and nitric acid can have a major role in driving winter smog episodes in cities. The latest result is similarly important but in a completely different area, says Kirkby.

“In polar regions, aerosols and clouds have a warming effect because they absorb infrared radiation otherwise lost to space and then radiate it back down to the surface, whereas they reflect no more incoming sunlight than the snow-covered surface. As more sea surface is exposed by melting ice, the increased iodic acid aerosol and cloud-seed formation could provide a previously unaccounted positive feedback that accelerates the loss of sea ice. However, the effect has not yet been modelled so we can’t quantify it yet.”

ALICE shines light inside lead nuclei

An ultra-relativistic electromagnetically charged projectile carries a strongly contracted field that can be thought of as a flux of quasi-real photons. This is known as the equivalent-photon approximation, and was proposed by Fermi and later developed by Weizsäcker and Williams. In practice, this means that the proton or lead (Pb) beams of the LHC, moving at ultra-relativistic energies, also carry a quasi-real photon beam, which can be used to look inside protons or nuclei. The ALICE collaboration is in this way using the LHC as a photon–hadron collider, shining light inside lead nuclei to measure the photoproduction of charmonia and provide constraints on nuclear shadowing.

The intensity of the electromagnetic field, and the corresponding photon flux, is proportional to the square of the electric charge. This type of interaction is therefore greatly enhanced in the collisions of lead ions (Z = 82). Ultra-peripheral collisions (UPCs), in which the impact parameter is larger than the sum of the radii of two Pb nuclei, are a particularly useful way to study photonuclear collisions. Here, purely hadronic interactions are suppressed, due to the short range of the strong force, and photonuclear interactions dominate. The photoproduction of vector mesons in these reactions has a clean experimental signature: the decay products of the vector meson are the only signals in an otherwise empty detector.

Nuclear shadowing was first observed by the European Muon Collaboration at CERN in 1982

Coherent heavy-vector–meson photoproduction, wherein the photon interacts consistently with all the nucleons in a nucleus, is of particular interest because of its connection with gluon distribution functions (PDFs) in protons and nuclei. At low Bjorken-x values, gluon PDFs are significantly suppressed in the nucleus relative to free proton PDFs – a phenomenon known as nuclear shadowing that was first observed by the European Muon Collaboration at CERN in 1982 by comparing the structure functions of iron and deuterium in the deep inelastic scattering of muons.

**Fig. 1.** Measured differential cross section of the coherent J/ψ photoproduction in Pb–Pb UPC events as a function of rapidity. The error bars (boxes) show the statistical (systematic) uncertainties. Theoretical calculations are also shown. The grey band represents the uncertainties of the EPS09 LO calculation. Credit: CERN

Heavy-vector–meson photoproduction measurements provide a powerful tool to study poorly known gluon-shadowing effects at low x. The scale of the four-momentum transfer of the interaction corresponds to the perturbative regime of QCD in the case of heavy charmonium states. The gluon shadowing factor – the ratio of the nuclear PDF to the proton PDF – can be evaluated by measuring the nuclear suppression factor, defined to be the square root of the ratio of the coherent vector–meson photonuclear production cross section on nuclei to the photonuclear cross-section in the impulse approximation that is based on the exclusive photoproduction measurements with a proton target.

Ultra-peripheral collisions

The ALICE collaboration recently submitted for publication the measurement of the coherent photoproduction of J/ψ and ψ′ at midrapidity |y| < 0.8 in Pb–Pb UPCs at 5.02 TeV. The J/ψ is reconstructed using the dilepton (ℓ⁺ℓ^–) and proton–antiproton decay channels, while for the ψ′, the dilepton and the ℓ⁺ℓ^– π⁺π^– decay channels are studied. These data complement the ALICE measurement of the coherent J/ψ cross-section at forward rapidity, –4 < y < –2.5, providing stringent constraints on nuclear gluon shadowing.

The nuclear gluon shadowing factor of about 0.65 at Bjorken-x between 0.3 × 10^–3 and 1.4 × 10^–3 is estimated from the comparison of the measured coherent J/ψ cross-section with the impulse approximation at midrapidity, which implies moderate nuclear shadowing. The measured rapidity dependence of the coherent cross-section is not completely reproduced by models in the full rapidity range. The leading twist approximation of the Glauber–Gribov shadowing (LTA-GKZ) and the energy-dependent hot-spot model (GG-HS (CCK)) gives the best overall description of the rapidity dependence but shows tension with data at semi-forward rapidities 2.5 < |y| < 3.5 (figure 1). The data might be better explained with a model where shadowing has a smaller effect at Bjorken x ~ 10^–2 or x ~ 5 ∙ 10^–5, corresponding to this rapidity range.

The ratio of the ψ′ to J/ψ cross-sections at midrapidity is consistent with the ratio of photoproduction cross sections measured by the H1 and LHCb collaborations, with the leading twist approximation predictions for Pb–Pb UPCs as well as with the ALICE measurement at forward rapidities. This leads to the conclusion that shadowing effects are similar for 2S (ψ′) and 1S (J/ψ) states.

In LHC Run 3 and 4, ALICE expects to collect a 10-times-larger data sample than in Run 2, taking data in a continuous mode, and thus with higher efficiency. UPC physics will profit from this by large integrated luminosity as well as lower systematic uncertainty connected to the measurement and will be able to provide the shadowing factor differentially in wide Bjorken-x intervals.

The hitchhiker’s guide to weak decays

Most travellers know that it is essential to have a good travel guide when setting out into unexplored territory. A book where one can learn what previous travellers discovered about these surroundings, with both global information on the language, history and traditions of the land to be explored, and practical details on how to overcome day-to-day difficulties. Andrzej Buras’s recent book, Gauge Theory of Weak Decays, is the ideal guide for both new physicists and seasoned travellers, and experimentalists and theoreticians alike, who wish to start a new expedition into the fascinating world of weak meson decays, in pursuit of new physics.

The physics of weak decays is one of the most active and interesting frontiers in particle physics, from both the theoretical and the experimental points of view. Major steps in the construction of the Standard Model (SM) have been made possible only thanks to key observations in weak decays. The most famous example is probably the suppression of flavour-changing neutral currents in kaon decays, which led Glashow, Iliopoulos and Maiani to postulate, in 1970, the existence of the charm quark, well before its direct discovery. But there are many other examples, such as the heaviness of the top quark, inferred from the large matter-to-antimatter oscillation frequency of neutral B mesons, again well before its discovery. In the post-Higgs-discovery era, weak decays are a privileged observatory in which to search for signals of physics beyond the SM. The recent “B-physics anomalies”, reported by LHCb and other experiments, could indeed be the first hint of new physics. The strategic role that weak decays play in the search for new physics is further reinforced by the absence on the horizon, at least in the near future, of a collider with a centre-of-mass energy exceeding that of the LHC, while the LHC and other facilities still have a large margin of improvement in precision measurements.

As Buras describes with clarity, signals of new physics in the weak decays of K, D, and B mesons, and other rare low-energy processes, could manifest themselves as deviations from the precise predictions of the corresponding decay rates that we are able to derive within the SM. In the absence of a reference beyond-the-SM theory, it is not clear where, and at which level of precision, these deviations could show up. But general quantum field theory arguments suggest that weak decays are particularly sensitive probes of new physics, as they can often be predicted with high accuracy within the SM.

The two necessary ingredients for a journey in the realm of weak decays are therefore precise SM predictions on the one hand, and a broad-spectrum investigation of beyond-the-SM sensitivity on the other. These are precisely the two ingredients of Buras’s book. In the first part, he guides the reader though all the steps necessary to arrive to the most up-to-date predictions for rare decays. This part of the book offers different paths to different readers: students are guided, in a very pedagogical way, from tree-level calculations to high-precision multi-loop calculations. Experienced readers can directly find up-to-date phenomenological expressions that summarise the present knowledge on virtually any process of current experimental interest. This part of the book can also be viewed as a well-thought-out summary of the history of precise SM calculations for weak decays, written by one of its most relevant protagonists.

Beyond the Standard Model

The second part of the book is devoted to physics beyond the SM. Here the style is quite different: less pedagogical and more encyclopaedic. Employing a pragmatic approach, which is well motivated to discuss low-energy processes, extensions of the SM are classified according to properties of hypothetical new heavy particles, from Z′ bosons to leptoquarks, and from charged Higgs bosons to “vector-like” fermions. This allows Buras to analyse the impact of such models on rare processes in a systematic way, with great attention paid to correlations between observables.

To my knowledge, this book is the first comprehensive monograph of this type, covering far more than just the general aspects of SM physics, as may be found in many other texts on quantum field theory. The uniqueness of this book lies in its precious details on a wide variety of interesting rare processes. It is a key reference that was previously missing, and promises to be extremely useful in the coming decades.

LHCb observes four new tetraquarks

The LHCb collaboration has added four new exotic particles to the growing list of hadrons discovered so far at the LHC. In a paper posted to the arXiv preprint server yesterday the collaboration reports the observation of two tetraquarks with a new quark content (cc̄us̄): a narrow one, Z_cs(4000)⁺, and a broader one Z_cs(4220)⁺. Two other new tetraquarks, X(4685) and X(4630), with a quark content cc̄ss̄, were also observed. The results, which emerged thanks to adding the statistical power from LHC Run 2 to previous datasets, follow four tetraquarks discovered by the collaboration in 2016 and provide grist for the mill of theorists seeking to explain the nature of tetraquark binding mechanisms.

Dalitz plot showing eight tetraquarks — **Mountain ridges** A Dalitz plot of 24 thousand B⁺→J/ψφK⁺ decays observed by the LHCb collaboration. Vertical and horizontal bands reveal the presence of intermediate particles during the decay. Credit: LHCb collaboration

The new exotic states were observed in an almost pure sample of 24 thousand B⁺→J/ψφK⁺ decays, which, as a three-body decay, may be visualised using a Dalitz plot (see “Mountain ridges” figure). Horizontal and vertical bands indicate the temporary production of tetraquark resonances which subsequently decay to a J/ψ meson and a K⁺ meson or a J/ψ meson and a φ meson, respectively. The most prominent vertical bands correspond to the cc̄ss̄ tetraquarks X(4140), X(4274), X(4500) and X(4700) which were first observed in June 2016. The collaboration has now resolved two new horizontal bands corresponding to the cc̄us̄ states Z_cs(4000)⁺ and Z_cs(4220)⁺, and two additional vertical bands corresponding to the cc̄ss̄ states X(4685) and X(4630).

These states may have very different inner structures
Liming Zhang

The results have already triggered theoretical head scratching. In November, the BESIII collaboration at the Beijing Electron–Positron Collider II reported the discovery of the first candidate for a charged hidden-charm tetraquark with strangeness, tentatively dubbed Z_cs(3985)^– (CERN Courier January/February 2021 p12). It is unclear whether the new Z_cs(4000)⁺ tetraquark can be identified with this state, say physicists. Though their masses are consistent, the width of the BESIII particle is ten times smaller. “These states may have very different inner structures,” says lead analyst Liming Zhang of the LHCb collaboration. “The one seen by BESIII is a narrow and longer-lived particle, and is easier to understand with a nuclear-like hadronic molecular picture, where two hadrons interact via a residual strong force. The one we observed is much broader, which would make it more natural to interpret as a compact multiquark candidate.”

59 hadrons

The new observations take the tally of new hadronic states discovered at the LHC – which includes several pentaquarks as well as rare and excited mesons and baryons – to 59 (see “Diagram of discovery” figure). Though quantum chromodynamics naturally allows the existence of states beyond conventional two- and three-quark mesons and baryons, the detailed mechanisms responsible for binding multi-quark states are still largely mysterious. Tetraquarks, for example, could be tightly bound pairs of diquarks or loosely bound meson-meson molecules – or even both, depending on the production process.

Who would have guessed we’d find so many exotic hadrons?
Patrick Koppenburg

“Who would have guessed we’d find so many exotic hadrons?” says former LHCb physics coordinator Patrick Koppenburg, who put the plot together. “I hope that they bring us to a better modelling of the strong interaction, which is very much needed to understand, for instance, the anomalies we see in B-meson decays.”

Alexei Onuchin 1934–2021

Alexei Onuchin, one of the pioneers of experiments at colliding beams, passed away on 9 January in Novosibirsk, Russia.

Onuchin was born in 1934 in a small village in the Gorky (Nizhny Novgorod) region. After graduating from high school with honours, he decided to try his hand at science and in 1953 he entered the physics department of Moscow State University. In 1959 he graduated with honours and was invited by Gersh Budker to work at the newly organised Institute of Nuclear Physics at Novosibirsk (INP).

At INP, Onuchin enjoyed many important roles. He took part in experiments at the world’s first electron–electron collider (VEP-1), actively worked on the preparation of a detector for the electron–positron collider VEPP-2, supervised the construction of the MD-1 detector for the VEPP-4 collider, was one of the leaders of the KEDR detector experiment at the VEPP-4M collider and was a great enthusiast of the detector project for the proposed Super Charm-Tau Factory. He was also an organiser and for many years the leader of the Budker INP group working at the BaBar experiment at SLAC.

During his career, Alexei made a great contribution to the development of experimental techniques in particle physics. It was this that determined the high level of experiments carried out at Budker INP and other laboratories. These include the development and production of multiwire proportional chambers for the MD-1, various counters based on Cherenkov radiation and the creation of a calorimeter based on liquid krypton, among many others.

Cherenkov counters held a special place in Alexei’s heart from the very beginning of his career as a student in the laboratory of Nobel-laureate Pavel Cherenkov. Starting from pioneering water-threshold counters in the experiment at VEPP–2, he later developed the MD–1 Cherenkov counters filled with ethylene pressurised to 25 bar, and finally suggested the aerogel counters with wavelength shifters (ASHIPH) now operating in the KEDR detector. For this work, in 2008 Alexei Onuchin was awarded the Cherenkov Prize of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

Alexei was a great teacher. Among his former students are professors, group leaders and members of the Russian Academy of Sciences. He was also a caring father and loving husband, who raised a large family with four children, five grandchildren and three great-grandchildren. He will always be remembered by his family, friends and colleagues.

Lifting the veil on supernova 1987A

The dusty core of SN1987A — **Missing link** A hot “blob” (inset) revealed by X-rays in the dusty core of SN1987A could be the location of the missing neutron star formed by the collapse of its progenitor star. The red area shows dust and cold gas observed at radio wavelengths by ALMA; the green and blue hues, recorded by Hubble and Chandra, show the collision between the expanding shock wave and material around the supernova. Credit: ALMA; NRAO/AUI/NSF; NASA/ESA

On 23 February 1987 astronomers around the world saw an extremely bright supernova, now called SN1987A. It was the closest supernova observed for over 300 years and was visible to the naked eye. The event was quickly confirmed to be the result of the collapse of “Sanduleak –69 202”, a blue supergiant star in the Large Magellanic Cloud. As the first nearby supernova in the era of modern astronomy, SN1987A remains one of the most monitored objects in the sky. Apart from confirming several important theories, such as radioactive decay being the source of the observed optical emission, the supernova also raised a number of questions that remain unanswered. The most important is: where is the remnant of the progenitor star?

Despite several false detection claims in the past, evidence is mounting that Sanduleak –69 202 collapsed into a neutron star

Despite several false detection claims in the past, evidence is mounting that Sanduleak –69 202 collapsed into a neutron star that is becoming more visible as the dust around it starts to settle. A new analysis by researchers in Italy and Japan based on high-energy X-ray data from the Chandra and NuSTAR space telescopes adds the latest support to this idea.

Even before the optical light from SN1987A was detected, several neutrino detectors around the world saw a burst of neutrinos. The brightest one was observed by Japan’s Kamiokande II detector, which detected a total of 12 antineutrinos approximately three hours before the first optical light reached Earth. The detection of antineutrinos seemed to confirm theoretical predictions for a star the size of Sanduleak –69 202: namely that it should collapse into a neutron star, and emit large numbers of neutrinos while doing so. The optical light arrives later because it is only produced when the shock waves from the collapse reach the surface of the star.

Since the newly formed neutron star would be expected to emit large amounts of energy at various wavelengths, one might assume it would be relatively easy to detect. However, no signs were found in follow-up searches over the past three decades, leading to much speculation about the fate of this star and its surrounding medium.

The first signs of the stellar remnants of SN1987A came from radio observations by the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) in Chile in 2019. A group led by Phil Cigan from Cardiff University in the UK used ALMA data at various frequencies to study the core of SN1987A. Close to the centre, they found a bright “blob” structure, the emission from which appeared to be compatible with radio emission from particles accelerated by a neutron star, also called a pulsar wind nebula. Although the researchers could not exclude local heating from ⁴⁴Ti produced during the supernova as the source, the results provided the first hint that the blob houses a young neutron star.

Wind power

Inspired by the ALMA results, Emanuele Greco from the University of Palermo and coworkers started to study the same region using X-ray data from Chandra and NuSTAR taken during 2012, 2013 and 2014. They found that the detected soft X-ray emission (0.5–8 keV) was compatible with thermal emission produced in the remnant shock waves of the supernova event with the circumstellar medium. However, at higher energies (10–20 keV) the emission was clearly non-thermal in nature. Describing their findings in a preprint posted in January, the group studied the two possible sources for such emission: synchrotron emission from a pulsar wind nebula and synchrotron emission produced in shock waves in the region. Whereas models for both ideas fit the spectral data, the pulsar wind nebula is favoured because the shock emission would not be expected to look like this for such a young remnant.

It appears that after 34 years of searching we will finally understand what happened in SN1987A

The reason why this neutron star has escaped previous observations in optical or soft X-ray energies is likely absorption by cold dust emitted during the supernova, which appears to still absorb a large part of the synchrotron emission observed in X-rays, especially at lower energies. But the dust is expected to start to heat up during the coming decades, thereby becoming transparent to lower energy emission. Greco and colleagues predict that, if the emission is indeed induced by a neutron star, it will become visible in the soft X-ray regime by 2030 with Chandra.

Although astronomers have just two observational hints that Sanduleak –69 202 did, as it should according to theory, collapse into a neutron star, it appears that after 34 years of searching we will finally understand what happened in SN1987A.

Deep learning tailors supersymmetry searches

CMS charginos neutralinos — **Fig. 1.** Observed and expected exclusion limits for a model of electroweak supersymmetry with slepton-mediated chargino and neutralino decays. Results using neural networks (NN) are compared with the expected limits based on the search-region (SR) approach, and the previous CMS analysis (green). Credit: CMS

Supersymmetry is a popular extension of the Standard Model (SM) that has the potential to resolve several open questions in particle physics. As a result of a postulated new symmetry between fermions and bosons, the theory predicts a “superpartner” for each SM particle. The lightest of these new particles could be what makes up dark matter, while additional new superpartners could resolve the question of why the Higgs boson has a relatively low mass. Many searches for supersymmetry have already been performed by the ATLAS and CMS collaborations, but most have focused on strongly interacting superpartners that could be very heavy. It is possible, however, that electroweak production of supersymmetric particles is the dominant or only source of superpartners accessible at the LHC.

Supersymmetric events are expected to have an imbalance in transverse momentum

The unprecedented data volume of LHC Run 2 provides a unique opportunity to search for rare processes such as electroweak production of supersymmetric particles. A recent result from the CMS collaboration uses the Run-2 dataset to search for the superpartners of the electroweak bosons, called charginos and neutralinos. Events with three or more charged leptons, or two leptons of the same charge, were analysed. Such events are relatively rare in the SM, and, if they exist, charginos and neutralinos are predicted to create an excess of events with these topologies. Supersymmetric events are also expected to have an apparent imbalance in transverse momentum, because the lightest supersymmetric particle should evade detection. Correlations between the multiple leptons in the events, and between the leptons and the momentum imbalance, can be used to define a set of discriminating variables sensitive to chargino and neutralino production. These variables are used to assign the selected events into several search regions that address different possible signals of the production and decay of supersymmetric particles. Making such a multivariate binning optimal in every corner of phase-space, and for any possible manifestation of supersymmetry, is a challenging task.

Parametric machine learning

Events with three electrons and/or muons provide the bulk of the sensitivity by striking the best balance between signal purity and yields. A novel search approach is used that aims at better capturing the complexity of the events than is possible using predetermined search regions: parametric machine learning. The aim is to achieve the maximum sensitivity for any parameter choice nature might have made, as supersymmetry is not one model, but a class of models. Variations in the masses of the superpartners can substantially modify the observable signatures. Parametric neural networks were trained to find charginos and neutralinos with the unknown mass parameters added as input variables to the training. The network can evaluate the data at fixed values of the mass parameters, effectively performing a dedicated search for a signal with given masses in the data (figure 1).

The parametric neural network, together with a new optimised event binning of the other event categories, makes this analysis the most powerful search for charginos and neutralinos carried out by the CMS collaboration so far. The neural network alone results in a sensitivity boost that ranges from 30% to more than 100%. Substantial improvements occur for models where the decay of the charginos and neutralinos are mediated by the superpartners of leptons. The improvements become even larger when the mass splitting between sleptons and the chargino is relatively small. The data show no evidence for electroweak superpartner production, and chargino masses up to 1450 GeV, compared to 1150 GeV in earlier CMS searches for this scenario, are excluded at 95% confidence.

Topics

Reset your password

Registration complete