Topics

Dielectrons take the temperature of Pb–Pb collisions

17 January 2024

A report from the ALICE experiment.

ALICE figure 1

Collisions between lead ions at the LHC produce the hottest system ever created in the lab, exceeding those in stellar interiors by about a factor of 105. At such temperatures, nucleons no longer exist and quark–gluon plasma (QGP) is formed. Yet, a precise measurement of the initial temperature of the QGP created in these collisions remains challenging. Information about the early stage of the collision gets washed out because the system constituents continue to interact as it evolves. As a result, deriving the initial temperature from the hadronic final state requires a model-dependent extrapolation of system properties (such as energy density) by more than an order of magnitude.

In contrast, electromagnetic radiation in the form of real and virtual photons escapes the strongly interacting system. Moreover, virtual photons – emerging in the final state as electron–positron pairs (dielectrons) – carry mass, which allows early and late emission stages to be separated.

Radiation from the late hadronic phase dominates the thermal dielectron spectrum at invariant masses below 1 GeV. The yield and spectral shape in this mass window reflects the in-medium properties of vector mesons, mainly the ρ, and can be connected to the restoration of chiral symmetry in hot and dense matter. In the intermediate-mass region (IMR) between about 1 and 3 GeV, thermal radiation is expected to originate predominantly from the QGP, and an estimate of the initial QGP temperature can be derived from the slope of the exponential spectrum. This makes dielectrons a unique tool to study the properties of the system at its hottest and densest stage.

A new approach to separate the heavy-flavour contribution experimentally has been employed for the first time at the LHC

At the LHC, this measurement is challenging because the expected thermal dielectron yield in the IMR is outshined by a physical background that is about 10 times larger, mainly from semileptonic decays of correlated pairs of cc or bb hadrons. In ALICE, the electron and positron candidates are selected in the central barrel using complementary information provided by the inner tracking system (ITS), time projection chamber and time-of-flight measurements. Figure 1 (left) shows the dielectron invariant-mass spectrum in central lead–lead (Pb–Pb) collisions. The measured distribution is compared with a “cocktail” of all known contributions from hadronic decays. At masses below 0.5 GeV, an enhancement of the dielectron yield over the cocktail expectation is observed, which is consistent with calculations that include thermal radiation from the hadronic phase and an in-medium modification of the ρ-meson. Between 0.5 GeV and the ρ mass (0.77 GeV) a small discrepancy between the data and calculations is observed.

In the IMR, however, systematic uncertainties on the cocktail contributions from charm and beauty prevent any conclusion being drawn about thermal radiation from QGP. To overcome this limitation, a new approach to separate the heavy-flavour contribution experimentally has been employed for the first time at the LHC. This approach exploits the high-precision vertexing capabilities of the ITS to measure the displaced vertices of heavy-quark pairs. Figure 1 (right) shows the dielectron distribution in the IMR compared to template distributions from Monte Carlo simulations. The best fit includes templates from heavy-quark pairs and an additional prompt dielectron contribution, presumably from thermal radiation. This is the first experimental hint of thermal radiation from the QGP in Pb–Pb collisions at the LHC, albeit with a significance of 1σ.

Ongoing measurements with the upgraded ALICE detector will provide an unprecedented improvement in precision, paving the way for a detailed study of thermal radiation from hot QGP.

Further reading

ALICE Collab. 2023 arXiv:2308.16704.


Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /opt/app-root/src/wp-content/plugins/advanced-custom-fields-pro/includes/acf-value-functions.php on line 153
bright-rec iop pub iop-science physcis connect