Comsol -leaderboard other pages

Topics

Tales of TRIUMF

The TRIUMF laboratory’s 50-year legacy is imprinted on its 13-acre campus in Vancouver; decades-old buildings of cinderblock and corrugated steel sit alongside new facilities housing state-of-the-art equipment. With each new facility, the lab continues its half-century journey from a regional tri-university meson facility (from where the acronym TRIUMF comes) to a national and international hub for science.

At the laboratory’s centre is the original 520 MeV cyclotron, a negative-hydrogen-ion accelerator so well engineered when it was first built that it continues to function (albeit with updated controls and electronics) as TRIUMF’s heart. Over the past 50 years, the TRIUMF cyclotron has spurred the growth of a diverse and multidisciplinary community whose ideas continue to coax new uses from the decades-old accelerator. These new applications serve to continuously redefine TRIUMF as an institution: a superconducting linear accelerator that complements the original cyclotron; 17 universities and counting that have joined the original trio; and an expanding network of collaborators that now spans the globe.

TRIUMF, which began with a daring idea and a simple patch of rainforest on the University of British Columbia’s (UBC) south campus, is this year reflecting on its rich past, its vibrant present and the promise of a bright future.

The tri-university meson facility

The first inklings for the tri-university meson facility were themselves a product of three separate elements: a trio of Canadian universities, a novel accelerator concept and an appetite for collaboration within the field of nuclear physics in the early 1960s. And the researchers involved were well positioned to develop such a proposal. John Warren, at that time head of the nuclear-physics group at UBC, had established a team of remarkable graduate students while constructing a 3 MeV Van de Graaff accelerator. Erich Vogt had just transitioned to the UBC physics faculty from an illustrious career as a theoretical nuclear physicist at the Chalk River Laboratory in Ontario. And finally, J Reginald Richardson, a Canadian-born physicist at the University of California in Los Angeles (UCLA), who had finalised a concept for a sector-focused, spiral-ridge negative-hydrogen-ion cyclotron – many of the ideas for which came while holidaying at his cottage on Galiano Island on the West Coast of British Columbia. In the years that followed, all three of them would go on to become a director of TRIUMF.

At the time, the world was ready to dig deeper into nuclear structure and explore other hadronic mysteries using powerful meson beams. This push for “meson factories” led to LAMPF in the US, SIN (now PSI) in Switzerland and, eventually, TRIUMF in Vancouver.

In 1964, a young physicist named Michael Craddock (who would become a long-time CERN Courier contributor) completed his PhD in nuclear physics at the University of Oxford in the UK before joining the UBC physics faculty. In June 1965, Craddock attended a meeting between representatives of UBC, the University of Victoria and Simon Fraser University, and wrote a summary of the proceedings: an agreement to develop a proposal for a tri-university meson facility based on the Richardson negative-hydrogen-ion cyclotron. Not three years later, in April 1968, the group received $19 million CDN in federal funding and construction began.

Warren presided as TRIUMF’s first director, and many of the accelerator’s build team came from his Van de Graaff graduate students. The initial organisation consisted of a university faculty member directing the engineers and consultants responsible for each of the main components of the cyclotron: its ion source, radio-frequency, magnet and vacuum systems. Joop Burgerjon, the engineer for the construction of the 50 MeV negative-hydrogen-ion cyclotron at the University of Manitoba, which was itself a copy of the 50 MeV UCLA cyclotron, became the chief engineer for TRIUMF.

Ewart Blackmore (one of this article’s authors) was one of Warren’s graduate students who was brought back to work on the accelerator design and construction. In 1968, while working as a postdoctoral fellow at what is now the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, in the UK, Blackmore and another postdoctoral fellow, David Axen (also a former UBC graduate student) received a call to coordinate an experiment to measure the dissociation rate of negative hydrogen ions in a magnetic field. This is an important parameter for setting the maximum magnetic field of the cyclotron. The measurement used the proton linear accelerator at the Rutherford laboratory and resulted in a higher dissociation rate than expected from earlier experiments, increasing the size of the cyclotron by 4%.

Upon his return to Vancouver, Blackmore shouldered the responsibility for the cyclotron’s injection, beam diagnostics and extraction systems. All of these components and more were put to the test with a full-scale model of the cyclotron’s centre core, which achieved first beam in 1972. Finally, despite a six-month delay to reshape the magnetic field produced by the 4000 tonne magnet, the TRIUMF team of about 160 physicists, engineers and technical staff coaxed a beam of protons from the cyclotron on 15 December 1974. TRIUMF’s scientific programme began the following year with an initial complement of experimental beamlines: proton, neutron, pion and muon. In the end, the project was on budget and very near the original schedule. The machine reached its design current of 100 μA in 1977, with Blackmore coordinating the first five years of commissioning and operations. He recalls that it was a remarkable experience to witness the moment first beam was achieved from the cyclotron. “At the start of it all, most of us had little understanding of cyclotrons and related technologies, but we had the valuable experience we had gained as graduate students.”

International physics hub

The story of TRIUMF quickly developed, the lab reinventing itself time and again to keep up with the fast pace at which the field was evolving. By the early 1980s, TRIUMF was a well-established accelerator laboratory that operated the world’s largest cyclotron. In those days, TRIUMF utilised proton and neutron beams to drive a powerful research programme in nucleon–nucleon/nucleus interaction studies, muon beams for muon-spin-rotation experiments in material sciences, pion beams for nuclear-structure studies, and meson beams for precision electroweak experiments.

However, as the field advanced, new discoveries in meson science were changing the landscape. TRIUMF responded by proposing an even-larger accelerator system, the 30 GeV KAON (Kaons, Antiprotons, Other hadrons and Neutrinos) complex. When fully complete, KAON would have allowed cutting-edge high-energy-physics experiments at the intensity frontier. It was a bold proposal that garnered substantial national and international interest but ultimately did not find enough political support to be funded. Nevertheless, the concept itself was considered visionary, and the science that TRIUMF wanted to enact was taken up decades later in modified forms at the J-PARC complex in Japan and the upcoming FAIR facility in Germany (CERN Courier July/August 2017 p41).

The loss of KAON forced an existential crisis on TRIUMF, and the laboratory responded in two parallel directions. Firstly, TRIUMF expanded Canada’s contributions to international physics collaborations. During the decade-long campaign to design KAON, TRIUMF had developed an impressive array of scientific and engineering talent and capabilities in the design of accelerators, production targets and detectors. This enabled the Canadian physics community – supported by TRIUMF – to contribute to CERN’s Large Hadron Collider (LHC) and join the ATLAS collaboration, building components such as the warm twin-aperture quadrupoles for the LHC and the hadronic endcap calorimeter for ATLAS. This positioned TRIUMF as Canada’s gateway to international subatomic physics and paved the way for Canada’s contributions to other major physics collaborations like T2K in Japan.

The laboratory’s second response to the loss of KAON was the development at TRIUMF of a new scientific programme centred on rare isotopes. By the 1980s, the field of rare isotopes had become of burgeoning interest, opening new avenues of research for TRIUMF into nuclear astrophysics, fundamental nuclear physics and low-energy precision probes of subatomic symmetries. TRIUMF had recognised the worldwide shortage of isotope production facilities and understood the role it could play in rectifying the situation. The lab already possessed expertise in beam and target physics, design and engineering — and, since its inception, a high-powered 520 MeV cyclotron that could act as a beam driver for producing exotic isotopes.

Rare-isotope beams at TRIUMF started during the KAON era with the small TISOL (Test facility of Isotope Separation On-Line) project in 1987, which used an isotope-separation concept developed at CERN’s ISOLDE facility. Experience at TISOL gave its proponents confidence that a much-larger-scale rare-isotope-beams facility could be built at TRIUMF. And so the Isotope Separator and Accelerator (ISAC) era was born at TRIUMF. Today, TRIUMF’s ISAC boasts the highest production power of any ISOL-type facility and some of the highest rates of rare-isotope production in the world. ISAC enables TRIUMF to produce isotopes for a variety of research areas, including studies of the formation of the heavy chemical elements in the universe, exploration of phenomena beyond the Standard Model of particle physics and inquiry into the deepest secrets of the atomic nucleus. In addition, spin-polarised beta-emitting isotopes produced at TRIUMF make possible detailed probes for surface and interface studies in complex quantum materials or novel batteries, benefiting the molecular- and materials-science communities.

TRIUMF is continuing to build on its expertise and capabilities in isotope science by adding new rare-isotope production facilities to supply the laboratory’s existing experimental stations. A new project, ARIEL (the Advanced Rare Isotope Laboratory), will add two rare-isotope production stations driven by a new proton beamline from the cyclotron and a new electron beamline from a new superconducting linear accelerator (designed and built in Canada). ARIEL will triple the output of the science programme based on rare-isotope beams, creating new opportunities for innovation and allowing the lab to branch off into promising new areas, even outside of subatomic physics, materials science and nuclear astrophysics. Although ARIEL’s completion date is set for 2023, the facility’s multi-stage installation will allow the TRIUMF community to begin scientific operations as early as 2019.

An innovation lab

TRIUMF’s history is defined not only by a drive to push the frontiers of science and discovery, but also those of innovation. The flexibility of the iconic cyclotron at the heart of TRIUMF’s scientific programme has allowed the lab to venture into areas that few could have imagined at the time of its original proposal. Standing on the shoulders of its founders, TRIUMF’s community now turns to the next half-century and beyond, and asks: how can TRIUMF increase its impact on our everyday lives?

While fundamental research remains core to TRIUMF’s mission, the laboratory has long appreciated the necessity and opportunity for translating its technologies to the benefit of society. TRIUMF Innovations, the lab’s commercialisation arm, actively targets and develops new opportunities for collaboration and company creation surrounding the physics-based technologies that emerge from the TRIUMF network.

Perhaps the most long-standing of these collaborations is TRIUMF’s more than 30-year partnership with the global health-science company Nordion. A team of TRIUMF scientists, engineers and technicians works with Nordion to operate TRIUMF cyclotrons to produce commercial medical isotopes that are used in diagnosing cancer and cardiac conditions. During the course of this partnership, more than 50 million patient doses of medical isotopes have been produced at TRIUMF and delivered to patients around the world.

Another outcome of TRIUMF Innovations is ARTMS Products Inc, which produces cyclotron-target technology enabling cleaner and greener manufacturing of medical isotopes within local hospitals. ARTMS has already secured venture-capital funding and multiple successful installations are under way around the world. Its technology for producing the most commonly used medical isotope, technetium-99, will help stabilise the global isotope supply chain in the wake of the shutdown of the Chalk River reactor facility.

TRIUMF Innovations will play a key role in fostering industry relationships enabled by the future Institute for Advanced Medical Isotopes (IAMI), a critical piece of infrastructure that will advance nuclear medicine in Canada. Supported by TRIUMF’s life sciences division, IAMI will provide infrastructure and expertise towards developing new diagnostics and radiotherapies. IAMI will also provide industry partners with facilities to study and test new isotopes and radiopharmaceuticals that hold great promise for improving the health of patients in Canada and around the world.

Similarly, TRIUMF and TRIUMF Innovations are also working to support the emerging field of targeted alpha-emitting therapeutics — radiotherapy medicines that hold new promise for patients who have been diagnosed with advanced and life-threatening metastasised cancers. Multiple new companies are currently developing novel treatments, but all are hampered by a global shortage of actinium-225 (225Ac), a hard-to-produce isotope at the core of many of these therapies. The TRIUMF cyclotron is unmatched in 225Ac production capacity, and the laboratory is working with researchers and industry partners to bring this production online and to speed up the development of new therapies with the potential to offer new hope to patients with cancers that are currently deemed incurable.

Beyond these developments, TRIUMF Innovations manages a portfolio of TRIUMF products and services that range from providing irradiation services for stress-testing communications and aerospace technologies to improving the efficacy and safety of mining exploration using muon detectors to help geologists estimate the size and location of ore deposits.

In the coming years, TRIUMF Innovations will continue to advance commercialisation both within TRIUMF and through TRIUMF’s networks. For example, TRIUMF is now seeking to develop a new data-science hub to connect its 20 member universities and global research partners to private-sector training opportunities and new quantum-computing tools. Drawing on data-science acumen developed through the ATLAS collaboration, TRIUMF is building industry partnerships that train academic researchers to use their data-science skills in the private sector and connect them with new research and career opportunities.

It is clear that TRIUMF’s sustained focus on commercialisation and collaboration will ensure that the lab continues to bring the benefits of accelerator-based science into society and to pursue world-leading science with impact.

The quest continues

Fifty years in, TRIUMF’s narrative is a continuous work in progress, a story unfolding beneath the mossy boughs of the same fir and alder trees that looked down on the first shovel strike, the first sheet of concrete, the first summer barbecue. In the coming years, the lab will continue to welcome fresh faces, to upgrade and add new facilities, to broach new frontiers, and to confront new challenges. It is difficult to predict exactly where the next era of TRIUMF will lead, but if there is one thing we can be sure of, it is that TRIUMF’s community of discoverers and innovators will be exploring ideas and seeking out new frontiers for years to come.

Violette Brisson 1934–2018

Violette Brisson, a highly respected member of the French particle-physics community who played a leading role in the discovery of neutral currents, passed away on 18 February at the age of 83. She led her long career at the Laboratoire Leprince-Ringuet (LLR) at École polytechnique, and the Laboratoire de l’Accélérateur Linéaire (LAL) in Orsay.

Violette joined the LLR in 1954 as a pioneering young woman in a domain then strongly dominated by male physicists. After a PhD devoted to measurements with cosmic rays, she was invited to work on the first hydrogen bubble-chamber experiment at Brookhaven’s Alternating Gradient Synchrotron. On her return to France, she joined André Lagarrigue’s heavy-liquid detector group. The highlight of the mid-1960s was the design and construction of Gargamelle, a giant bubble chamber to be located on the CERN PS neutrino and antineutrino beams. Violette’s expertise from the US was a strong asset to the project. She took part in the design of the illumination system of the chamber and was responsible for the implementation at LLR of the special scanning and measurement devices needed to handle Gargamelle pictures. Her parallel participation in the stopped-kaon experiment X2 allowed her group to master modern computing techniques for photo analysis.

When Gargamelle started operation in 1971, the focus turned to the search for weak neutral current (NC) events predicted by the Glashow–Weinberg–Salam model. Violette played a leading role in the analysis of the leptonic channel, which turned out to be decisive: a single and by now famous leptonic event with negligible background, together with hadronic events, were the basis of the ground-breaking NC discovery published in 1973. (This saga and the associated controversy with the US competition were related with humour by Violette during CERN’s 50th anniversary celebrations.) Afterwards, she became interested in nucleon structure functions in several experiments with Gargamelle and the Big European Bubble Chamber.

In the early 1980s, when the electron–proton collider HERA entered the scene, Violette fully engaged with this new project. She played a major role in the French contribution to HERA and to one of its experiments, H1. She joined LAL in 1988 and was personally strongly involved in the construction of the H1 liquid-argon calorimeter, going into every detail of its design and not hesitating to spend months within the cryostat to install the complex cabling with the technical teams. Later on she worked on the HERA Fabry-Pérot polarimeter for the high-luminosity phase. HERA did not find the hoped-for quark substructures or leptoquarks, but delivered a wealth of textbook results that provides reference proton-structure measurements for the LHC and, together with LEP and the Tevatron, fully unveiled the mechanism of electroweak unification first hinted at by the Gargamelle discovery of neutral currents.

In the 1990s, though already well advanced in her career, Violette was bold enough to move to a completely new domain – the quest for gravitational waves – within the French–Italian VIRGO experiment.

She again took on a major technical component of the detector, the 3 km-long vacuum chambers of the interferometer arms, taking care of the design of the complex ultra-high-vacuum system. This was a key ingredient to the success. It is comforting that, after many years of constant improvements of the interferometer, Violette was able to experience the first detection of a gravitational wave by VIRGO.

Beyond her talents as physicist, Violette had a deep sense of responsibility and outstanding organisational skills. She took on many collective duties, including assistant management of LLR for many years, the secretariat of the physics committee of the French Science Academy, French representation in international organisations such as IUPAP, and participation on conference committees. In 2003 she was nominated Chevalier de la Légion d’honneur.

Violette was not only a physicist: she was also a spouse, a mother and a faithful friend of many around the world, including a lot of colleagues. She led her life with passion, with a long and dense career crowned by two major discoveries. She will remain an inspiring model for all of us, and in particular to young female physicists.

Radio-frequency maestro: Daniel Boussard 1937–2018

The world of radio-frequency (RF) technology lost an outstanding inventor and leader when Daniel Boussard passed away on 6 January. Daniel made vast contributions to the design of RF systems for accelerating and controlling particle beams. He furthered our understanding in particle-beam dynamics and in the intricacies of controlling high-intensity beams. He was a technical innovator across low- and high-power electronics, right through to the sophisticated RF cavities required in the accelerators.

Daniel started at CERN in the late 1960s, working on the PS machine, but was soon recruited to design the beam control systems for the then new SPS accelerator. He made observations of the microwave signals disrupting the beams, putting forward his famous criterion for avoiding them. This started a programme that continues at CERN to this day to understand and control parasitic impedances, which drive beam instabilities, and to invent methods to counteract their effect. With increasing intensity in the SPS, formerly unobserved beam instabilities raised their heads. To deal with this, Daniel pioneered the use of new digital electronics, incorporating them in the one-turn feedback system that he invented to subdue the instabilities.

In the SPS, thoughts quickly turned towards using the machine for the P-PBAR project. Here the problem was to understand and control the noise sources inherent in the RF systems, which destroyed the circulating beams. Pinpointing the critical elements and finding solutions increased the lifetime of the beams from minutes to hundreds of hours.

To accelerate leptons in the SPS for the new LEP accelerator required high RF voltages. Daniel dared to consider installing, for the first time, a superconducting cavity into an environment with high-intensity proton beams. While helping to accelerate the leptons to higher LEP injection energies, it was essential to make this cavity “invisible” to the high-intensity proton beams. He solved this by using sophisticated RF feedback techniques, and the SPS subsequently happily “multi-cycled” protons and leptons for the lifetime of LEP. In these areas, Daniel became an acknowledged leader in the world and his ideas are essential to all modern machines.

With his extensive knowledge of superconducting (SC) RF systems, Daniel was asked to lead the project to install the huge SC RF cavities required for the LEP energy upgrade. While the cavities themselves had to be technically robust, careful design of the electronics to control the voltage and cope with unexpected problems (such as ponderomotive oscillation instabilities) was essential. The experience and understanding gained from SC RF systems in the SPS and in LEP led to their selection for the LHC, and Daniel led the design and implementation of these highly successful accelerating elements.

The tutorials and lectures given by Daniel at CERN accelerator schools on beam loading, RF noise and Schottky diagnostics have become classical references, continuing to serve generations of scientists all over the world. He mastered the art of explaining complex issues in a simple manner.

As a leader, Daniel was kind, fair and highly esteemed, giving clear and carefully thought-out decisions. The remarkable person he was, he took good care of the people entrusted to him and gave honest credit to all those working with him. His natural authority derived from his human qualities and his undoubted technical expertise.

He greatly loved the mountains, going on long hikes both on foot and on skis. It is not surprising, knowing his CERN career, that in his retirement in the south of France Daniel built a guided solar-panel array and became mayor of his village, Valavoire.

Introduction to Accelerator Dynamics

By Stephen Peggs and Todd Satogata
Cambridge University Press

9781107132849 feature

This concise book provides an overview of accelerator physics, a field that has grown rapidly since its inception and is progressing in many directions. Particle accelerators are becoming more and more sophisticated and rely on diverse technologies, depending on their application.

With a pedagogical approach, the book presents both the physics of particle acceleration, collision and beam dynamics, and the engineering aspects and technologies that lay behind the effective construction and operation of these complex machines. After a few introductory theoretical chapters, the authors delve into the different components and types of accelerators: RF cavities, magnets, linear accelerators, etc. Throughout, they also show the connections between accelerator technology and the parallel development of computational capability.

This text is aimed at university students at graduate or late undergraduate level, as well as accelerator users and operators. An introduction to the field, rather than an exhaustive treatment of accelerator physics, the book is conceived to be self-contained (to a certain extent) and to provide a strong starting point for more advanced studies on the topic. The volume is completed by a selection of exercises at the end of each chapter and an appendix with important formulae for accelerator design.

Data Analysis Techniques for Physical Scientists

By Claude A Pruneau
Cambridge University Press

9781108416788 feature

Also available at the CERN bookshop

Since the analysis of data from physics experiments is mainly based on statistics, all experimental physicists have to study this discipline at some point in their career. It is common, however, for students not to learn it in a specific advanced university course but in bits and pieces during their studies and subsequent career.

This textbook aims to present all of the basic statistics tools required for data analysis, not only in particle physics but also astronomy and any other area of the physical sciences. It is targeted towards graduate students and young scientists and, since it is not intended as a text for mathematicians or statisticians, detailed proofs of many of the theorems and results presented are left out.

After a philosophical introduction on the scientific method, the text is presented in three parts. In the first, the foundational concepts and methods of probability and statistics are provided, considering both the frequentist and Bayesian interpretations. The second part deals with the basic and most commonly used advanced techniques for measuring particle-production cross-sections, correlation functions and particle identification. Much attention is also given to the notions of statistical and systematic errors, as well as the methods used to unfold or correct data for the instrumental effects associated with measurements. Finally, in the third section, introductory techniques in Monte Carlo simulations are discussed, focusing on their application to experimental data interpretation.

Ripples in spacetime

By Govert Schilling
The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press

CCApr18_Book-ripples

In February 2016 the LIGO and Virgo collaborations announced the first detection of gravitational waves from the collision of two black holes. It was a splendid result for a quest that started about five decades ago with the design and construction of small prototypes of laser interferometers. Since this first discovery, at least five other binary black-hole mergers have been found and gravitational waves from two colliding neutron stars have also been detected. Gravitational-wave science is now booming, literally, and will continue to do so for a long time. The upcoming observational progress in this field will impact the development of astrophysics, cosmology and, perhaps, particle physics.

Govert Schilling is an award-winning science journalist with a special interest in astronomy and space science. In this book, he guides the reader through the development of gravitational-wave astronomy, from its very origin deep in the early days of general relativity up to the first LIGO discovery. He does so, not only by delving into the key moments of this wonderful piece of history, but also by explaining the main physical and engineering ideas that made it possible.

Moreover, Schilling does a very good job discussing the scientific context in which these events and ideas arose. Far from being a mere collection of events, the book offers the reader a journey that goes beyond its title, exploring and connecting topics such as the cosmic-microwave background and its polarisation, radioastronomy and pulsars, supernovae, primordial inflation, gamma-ray bursts and even dark energy. In addition, the last few chapters of the book discuss the science that may come next, when new interferometers will join LIGO and Virgo in this adventure, observing the sky from Earth (e.g. KAGRA) and space (LISA).

The book clearly aims to target a non-specialist readership and will surely be enjoyed by people lacking a prior knowledge of astrophysics, gravitational waves or cosmology. However, this does not mean that readers more well-versed in these topics will find the book uninspiring. Schilling addresses the reader in a direct, entertaining, almost colloquial manner, managing to explain complex concepts in a few paragraphs while keeping the science sound. Besides, the book gives an interesting (and sometimes surprising) glimpse into the lives, aspirations and mutual interactions of the scientific pioneers in the field of gravitational waves.

If an objection had to be found, it would be that in the first chapter the author belittles general relativity by introducing it as “the theory behind [the movie] Interstellar”. If this scares you, read on and fear nothing. As always happens, science outshines fiction, and the rest of the book proves why this is so.

Natural Complexity: A Modeling Handbook

By Paul Charbonneau
Princeton University Press

91TM2EXZIcL

This book aims to introduce readers to the study of complex systems with the help of simple computational models. After showing how difficult it is to define complexity, the author explains that complex systems are an idealisation of naturally occurring phenomena in which the macroscopic structures and patterns generated are not directly controlled by processes at the macroscopic level but arise instead from dynamical interactions at the microscopic level. This kind of behaviour characterises a range of natural phenomena, from avalanches to earthquakes, solar flares, epidemics and ant colonies.

In each chapter the author introduces a simple computer-based model for one such complex phenomenon. As the author himself states, such simplified models wouldn’t be able to reliably foresee the development of a real natural phenomenon, thus they are to be taken as complementary to conventional approaches for studying such systems.

Meant for undergraduate students, the book does not require previous experience in programming and each computational model is accompanied by Python code and full explanations. Nevertheless, students are expected to learn how to modify the code to tackle the problems included at the end of each chapter. Three appendices provide a review of Python programming, probability density functions and other useful mathematical tools.

Fashion, Faith and Fantasy in the New Physics of the Universe

By Roger Penrose
Princeton University Press

Also available at the CERN bookshop

The well-known mathematician and theoretical physicist Roger Penrose has produced another popular book, in which he gives a critical overview of contemporary fundamental physics. The main theme is that modern theoretical physics is afflicted by an overdose of fashion, faith and fantasy, which supposedly has led recent research astray.

There are three major parts of the book to which these three f-words relate, corresponding one-to-one with some of the most popular research areas in fundamental physics. The first part, labelled “fashion”, deals with string theory. “Faith” refers to the general belief in the correctness of quantum mechanics, while “fantasy” is the verdict for certain scenarios of modern cosmology.

The book starts with an overview of particle physics as a motivation for string theory and quickly focuses on its alleged shortcomings, most notably extra dimensions. Well-known criticisms, for instance linked to the multitude of solutions (“landscape of vacua”) of string theory or the postulate of supersymmetry, follow in due course. This material is mostly routine, but there are also previously unheard of concerns such as the notion of “too much functional freedom” or doubts about the decoupling of heavy string states (supposedly excitable, for example from the orbital kinetic energy of Earth).

Next the book turns to quantum mechanics and gives an enjoyable introduction to some of the key notions, such as superposition, spin, measurement and entanglement. The author emphasises, with great clarity, some subtle points such as how to understand the quantum mechanical superposition of space–times. In doing so, he raises some concerns and argues – quite unconventionally – that, to resolve them, it is necessary to modify quantum mechanics. In particular he asks that the postulate of linearity should be re-assessed in the presence of gravity.

The fantasy section gives an exposition of the key ideas of cosmology, in particular of all sorts of scenarios of inflation, big bang, cyclic universes and multiverses. This is all very rewarding to read, and particularly brilliant is the presentation of cosmological aspects of entropy, the second law of thermodynamics and the arrow of time. I consider this third section as the highlight of the book. The author does not hide his suspicion that many of these scenarios should not be trusted and dismisses them as crazy – while saying, as if with a twinkle in the eye: not crazy enough!

There is a brief, additional, final section that has a more personal and historical touch, and which tries to make a case for Penrose’s own pet theory: twistor theory. One cannot but feel that some of his resentment against string theory stems from a perceived under-appreciation of twistor theory. In particular, the author admits that his aversion to string theory comes almost entirely from its purported extra dimensions, whereas twistors work primarily in four dimensions.

This touches upon a weak point of the book: the author argues entirely from the direction of classical geometry, and so shares a fixation with extra dimensions in string theory with many other critics. What Penrose misses, however, is that these provide an elegant way to represent certain internal degrees of freedom (needed matter fields). But this is by no means generic – on the contrary, most string backgrounds are non-geometric. For example, some are better described by a bunch of Ising models with no identifiable classical geometry at all, so the agony of how to come to grips with such “compactified” dimensions turns into a non-issue. The point is that due to quantum dualities, there is, in general, no unambiguous objective reality of string “compactification” spaces, and criticism that does not take this “stringy quantum geometry” properly into account is moot.

Somewhat similar in spirit is the criticism of quantum mechanics, which according to Penrose should be modified due to an alleged incompatibility with gravity. Today most researchers would take the opposite point of view and consider quantum mechanics as fundamental, while gravity is a derived, emergent phenomenon. This viewpoint is strongly supported by the gauge-gravity duality and its recent offspring in terms of space–time geometry arising via quantum entanglement.

All-in-all, this book excels by covering a huge range of concepts from particle physics to quantum mechanics to cosmology, presented in a beautifully clear and coherent way (spiced up with many drawings), by an independent and truly deep-thinking master of the field. It also sports a considerable number of formulae and uses mathematical concepts (like complex analysis) that a general audience would probably find difficult to deal with; there are a number of helpful appendices for non-experts, though.

Thus, Fashion, Faith and Fantasy in the New Physics of the Universe seems to be suitable for both physics students and experienced physicists alike, and I believe that either group will profit from reading it, if taken with a pinch of salt. This is because the author criticises contemporary fundamental theories through his personal view as a classical relativist, and in doing so falls short when taking certain modern viewpoints into account.

Big science meets industry in Copenhagen

Big science equals big business, whether it is manufacturing giant superconducting magnets for particle colliders or perfecting mirror coatings for space telescopes. The Big Science Business Forum (BSBF), held in Copenhagen, Denmark, on 26–28 February, saw more than 1000 delegates from more than 500 companies and organisations spanning 30 countries discuss opportunities in the current big-science landscape.

Nine of the world’s largest research facilities – CERN, EMBL, ESA, ESO, ESRF, ESS, European XFEL, F4E and ILL – offered insights into procurement opportunities and orders totalling more than €12 billion for European companies in the coming years. These range from advisory engineering work and architectural tasks to advanced technical equipment, construction projects and radiation-resistant materials. A further nine organisations also joined the conference programme: ALBA, DESY, ELI-NP, ENEA, FAIR, MAX IV, SCK•CEN – MYRRHA, PSI and SKA, thereby gathering 18 of the world’s most advanced big-science organisations under one roof.

The big-science market is currently fragmented by the varying quality standards and procurement procedures of the different laboratories, delegates heard. BSBF aspired to offer a space to discuss the entry challenges for businesses and suppliers – including small- and medium-sized enterprises – who can be valuable business partners for big-science projects.

“The vision behind BSBF is to provide an important stepping stone towards establishing a stronger, more transparent and efficient big-science market in Europe and we hope that this will be the first of a series of BSBFs in different European cities,” said Agnete Gersing of the Danish ministry for higher education and science during the opening address.

Around 700 one-to-one business meetings took place, and delegates also visited the European Spallation Source and MAX IV facility just across the border in Lund, Sweden. Parallel sessions covered big science as a business area, addressing topics such as the investment potential and best practices of Europe’s big-science market.

“Much of the most advanced research takes place at big-science facilities, and their need for high-tech solutions provides great innovation and growth opportunities for private companies,” said Danish minister for higher education and science, Søren Pind.

Call for input to European strategy update

The European strategy for particle physics, which is due to be updated by May 2020, will guide the direction of the field to the mid-2020s and beyond. To inform this vital process, the secretariat of the European Strategy Group (ESG) is calling upon the particle-physics community across universities, laboratories and national institutes to submit written input by 18 December 2018.

The update of the European strategy got under way in September when the CERN Council established a strategy secretariat (CERN Courier November 2017 p37). Chaired by Halina Abramowicz, former chair of the European Committee for Future Accelerators (ECFA), the secretariat includes Keith Ellis (chair of CERN’s Scientific Policy Committee), Jorgen D’Hondt (current ECFA chair) and Lenny Rivkin (chair of the European Laboratory Directors group).

The ESG secretariat, which has been assigned the task of organising the update process, proposes to broadly follow the steps of the previous two strategy processes concluded in 2006 and 2013. An open symposium, which in previous editions took place in Orsay (France) and Kraków (Poland), will take place in the second half of May 2019, in which the community will be invited to debate scientific input into the strategy update. With the event expected to attract around 500 participants, the secretariat proposes to hold it over a period of four days.

To prepare for the open symposium, the location of which is expected to be decided by the summer, ESG calls for written contributions towards the end of the year. Input should be submitted via a portal on the strategy-update website, which will be available from the beginning of October once the update has been formally launched by the CERN Council. The link will appear on the CERN Council’s web pages (https://council.web.cern.ch/en) and will be widely communicated closer to the time.

A “briefing book” based on the discussions will then be prepared by a physics preparatory group and submitted to the ESG for consideration during a five-day-long drafting session in the second half of January 2020. A special ECFA session on 14 July 2019 during the European Physical Society conference on high-energy physics in Ghent, Belgium, will provide another important opportunity for the community to feed into the ESG’s drafting session.

Global perspective

The European strategy update takes into account the worldwide particle-physics landscape and developments in related fields, and was initiated to coordinate activities across a large, international and fast-moving community. The third update comes as the scale of particle-physics facilities is leading to increased globalisation of the field and as its research direction evolves.

Understanding the properties of the Higgs boson (which was discovered at CERN just before the previous strategy update) remains a key focus of analysis at the LHC and future colliders, as are precision measurements of other Standard Model (SM) parameters and searches for new physics beyond the SM.

Neutrino physics is another key area of interest, with much experimental activity taking place since the last update. A “physics beyond colliders” programme has also been established by CERN to explore projects complementary to high-energy colliders and projects of national laboratories. The European astroparticle and nuclear-physics communities, meanwhile, recently launched their own strategies (CERN Courier September 2017 p6; March 2018 p7), which will also feed into the ESG update.

“After the discovery of the Higgs boson, the field is presented with a number of challenges and opportunities,” says Abramowicz. “Guided by the input from the community, the European strategy will determine which of these opportunities will be pursued.”

bright-rec iop pub iop-science physcis connect