Comsol -leaderboard other pages

Topics

The tale of a billion-trillion protons

Before being smashed into matter at high energies to study nature’s basic laws, protons at CERN begin their journey rather uneventfully, in a bottle of hydrogen gas. The protons are separated by injecting the gas into the cylinder of an ion source and making an electrical discharge, after which they enter what has become the workhorse of CERN’s proton production for the past 40 years: a 36 m-long linear accelerator called Linac2. Here, the protons are accelerated to an energy of 50 MeV, reaching approximately one-third of the speed of light, ready to be injected into the first of CERN’s circular machines: the Proton Synchrotron Booster (PSB), followed by the Proton Synchrotron (PS) and the Super Proton Synchrotron (SPS). At each stage of the chain, they may end up driving fixed-target experiments, generating exotic beams in the ISOLDE facility, or being injected into the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) to be accelerated to the highest energies.

Situated at ground level on the main CERN site, Linac2 has delivered all of the protons for the CERN accelerator complex since 1978. Construction of Linac2 started in December 1973, and the first 50 MeV beam was obtained on 6 September 1978. Within a month, the design current of 150 mA was reached and the first injection tests in the PSB started. Routine operation of the PSB started soon afterwards, in December 1978. As proudly announced by CERN at the time, Linac2 was completed on budget and on schedule, for an overall cost of 23 million Swiss francs.

Linac2 is the machine that started more than a billion-trillion protons on trajectories that led to discoveries including the W and Z bosons, the creation of antihydrogen and the completion of the long search for the Higgs boson. On 12 November, Linac2 was switched off and will now be decommissioned as part of a major upgrade to the laboratory’s accelerator complex (CERN Courier October 2017 p32). Its design, operation and performance have been key factors in the success of CERN’s scientific programme and paved the way to its successor, Linac4, which will take over the task of producing CERN’s protons from 2020.

The decision to build Linac2 was taken in October 1973, with the aim to provide a higher-intensity proton beam compared to the existing Linac1 machine. Linac1 had been the original injector both to the PS when it began service in 1959, and to its booster (the PSB) when it was added to the chain in 1972. However, Linac1 was limited in the intensity it could provide, and the only way to higher intensity was for an entirely new construction.

Forward thinking

Linac2’s design parameters were chosen to comfortably exceed the nominal PSB requirements, providing a safety margin during operation and for future upgrades. Furthermore, it was decided to install the linac in a new building parallel to the Linac1 location instead of in the Linac1 tunnel. This avoided a long shut-down for installation and commissioning, and ensured that Linac1 was available as a back-up during the first years of Linac2 operation.

Linac2’s proton source was originally a huge 750 kV Cockcroft–Walton generator located in a shielded room, separate from the accelerator hall (figure 1), which provided the pre-acceleration to the entrance of the 4 m-long low energy beam transport line (LEBT). This transport line included a bunching system made of three RF cavities, after which protons were fed to the main accelerator: a drift-tube linac (DTL) that had many improvements with respect to the Linac1 design and became a standard for linacs at the time. The three accelerating RF “tanks”, increasing the beam energy up to 10.3, 30.5 and 50 MeV, respectively, with a total length of 33.3 m, were made of mild steel co-laminated with a copper sheet, with the vacuum and RF sealing provided by aluminium wire joints.

The RF system is of prime importance for the performance of linear accelerators. For Linac2, the amplifiers had to provide a total RF power of 7.5 MW just to accelerate the beam. The RF amplifiers were based on the Linac1 design principles, with larger diameters in order to safely deliver the higher power, and the RF tube was the same triode already used for most of the Linac 1 amplifiers.

The most significant upgrade to Linac2, which took place during the 1992/1993 shutdown, was the replacement of the 750 kV Cockcroft–Walton generator and of the LEBT with a new RF quadrupole (RFQ) only 1.8 m long, capable of bunching, focusing and accelerating the beam in the same RF structure. The RFQ was a new invention of the early 1980s that was immediately adopted at CERN: after the successful construction of a prototype RFQ for Linac1 (which at the time was still in service), the development of a record-breaking high-intensity RFQ for Linac2, capable of delivering to the DTL a current of 200 mA, started in 1984. The prototype high-current RFQ was commissioned on a test stand in 1989, and the replacement of the Linac2 pre-injector was officially approved in 1990.

Gearing up for the LHC

The main motivation for the higher current of Linac2 was to prepare the CERN injectors for the LHC, which was already in progress. It was clear that the LHC would require unprecedented beam brightness (intensity per emittance) from the injector chain, and one of the options considered was to go to single-turn injection into the PSB of a high-current linac beam to minimise emittance growth. This, in turn, required the highest achievable current from the linac. Another motivation for the replacement was the simpler operation and maintenance of the smaller RFQ compared with the large Cockcroft–Walton installation.

Construction of the new RFQ (figure 2) started soon after approval, and the new “RFQ2” system was installed at Linac2 during the normal shut-down in 1992/1993. Commissioning of the RFQ2 with Linac2 took a few weeks, and the 1993 physics run started with the new injector. Reaching the full design performance of the RFQ took a few years, mainly due to the slow cleaning of the surfaces that at first limited the peak RF fields possible inside the cavity. After the optics in the long transfer line were modified, the goal of 180 mA delivered to the PSB was achieved in 1998 – and this still ranks as the highest intensity proton beam ever achieved from a linac.

Throughout its life, Linac2 has undergone many upgrades to its subsystems, including major renovations of the control systems in 1993 and 2012, the exchange of more than half its magnet power supplies to more modern units (although a large number were still the same ones installed in the 1970s) and renovation of the RFQ and vacuum-control systems. Nevertheless, at its core, the three DTL RF cavities that are the backbone of the linac remained unchanged since their construction, as were more than 120 electromagnetic quadrupoles sealed in the drift tubes that have each pulsed more than 700 million times without a single magnet failure (figure 3).

Despite the performance and reliability of Linac2, the performance bottleneck of the injection chain for the LHC moved to the injection process of the PSB, which could only be resolved with a higher injection energy. This meant increasing the energy of the linac. At the time this was being considered, around a decade ago, Linac2 was already reaching 30 years of operation, and basing a new injector on it would have required a major consolidation effort. So the decision was made to move to a new accelerator called Linac4 (the name Linac3 is taken by an existing CERN linac that produces ions), which meant a clean slate for its design. Linac4 (figure 4) not only injects into the PSB at the higher energy of 160 MeV, but also switches to negative hydrogen-ion beam acceleration, which allows higher intensities to be accumulated in the PSB after removing the excess electrons.

As was the case when Linac2 took over from Linac1, Linac4 has been built in its own tunnel, allowing construction and commissioning to take place in parallel to the operation of Linac2 for the LHC (CERN Courier January/February 2018 p19). In connecting Linac4 to the PSB, some of the Linac2 transfer line will be dismantled to make space for additional shielding. But the original source, RFQ and three DTL cavities will remain in place for now – even if there is no possibility of their serving as a back-up once the change to Linac4 is made. As for the future of Linac2, hopefully you might one day be able to find part of the accelerator on display somewhere on the CERN site, so that its place in history is not forgotten.

Fixing gender in theory

Improving the participation of under-represented groups in science is not just the right thing to do morally. Science benefits from a community that approaches problems in a variety of different ways, and there is evidence that teams with mixed perspectives increase productivity. Moreover, many countries face a skills gap that can only be addressed by training more scientists, drawing from a broader pool of talent that cannot reasonably exclude half the population.

In the high-energy theory (HET) community, where creativity and originality are so important, the problem is particularly acute. Many of the breakthroughs in theoretical physics have come from people who think “differently”, yet the community does not acknowledge that being both mostly male and white encourages groupthink and lack of originality.

The gender imbalance in physics is well documented. Data from the American Physical Society and the UK Institute of Physics indicate that around 20% of the physics-research community is female, and the situation deteriorates significantly as one looks higher on the career ladder. By contrast, the percentage of females is higher in astronomy and the number of women at senior levels in astronomy has increased quite rapidly over the last decade.

However, research into gender in science often misses issues specific to particular disciplines such as HET. While many previous studies have explored challenges faced by women in physics, theory has not specifically been targeted, even though the representation of women is anomalously low.

In 2012, a group of string theorists in Europe launched a COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology) action with a focus on gender in high-energy theory. Less than 10% of string theorists are female, and, worryingly, postdoc-application data in Europe show that the percentage of female early-career researchers has not changed significantly over the past 15 years.

The COST initiative enabled qualitative surveys and the collection of quantitative data. We found some evidence that women PhD students are less likely to continue onto postdoctoral positions than male ones, although further data are needed to confirm this point. The data also indicate that the percentage of women at senior levels (e.g. heads of institutes) is extremely low, less than 5%. Qualitative data raised issues specific to HET, including the need for mobility for many years before getting a permanent position and the long working hours, which are above average even for academics. A series of COST meetings also provided opportunities for women in string theory to network and to discuss the challenges that they face.

Following the conclusion of the COST action in 2017, women from the string theory community obtained support to continue the initiative, now broadened to the whole of the HET community. “GenHET” is a permanent working group hosted by the CERN theory department whose goals are to increase awareness of gender issues, improve the presence of women in decision-making roles, and provide networking, support and mentoring for women, particularly during their early career.

GenHET’s first workshop on high-energy theory and gender was hosted by CERN in September, bringing together physicists, social scientists and diversity professionals (see Faces and Places). Further meetings are planned, and the GenHET group is also developing a web resource that will collect research and reports on gender and science, advertise activities and jobs, and offer  advice on evidence-based practice for supporting women. GenHET aims to propose concrete actions, for example encouraging the community to implement codes of conduct at conferences, and all members of the HET community are welcome to join the group.

Diversity is about much more than gender: in the HET community, there is also under-representation of people of colour and LGBTQ+ researchers, as well as those who are disabled, carers, come from less privileged socio-economic backgrounds, and so on. GenHET will work in collaboration with networks focusing on other diversity characteristics to help improve this situation, turning the high-energy theory community into one that truly reflects all of society.

CMS weighs in on flavour anomalies

A report from the CMS experiment

Recent results from LHCb and other experiments appear to challenge the assumption of lepton-flavour universality. To explore further, the CMS collaboration has recently conducted a new search probing one of the theories that attempts to explain these flavour “anomalies”. Using 77.3 fb–1 of proton–proton collision data recorded in 2016 and 2017 at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV, the CMS analysis is the first dedicated search for a neutral gauge boson with specific properties that couples only to leptons of the second and third family.

Although the Standard Model (SM) has been successful in describing current experimental results, it is generally believed to be incomplete. It cannot, for example, explain dark matter or the observed asymmetry between matter and antimatter in the universe. There are also several smaller differences between the experiment and the SM prediction that have been building up over the last few years. One set of intriguing anomalies has been reported by LHCb and other dedicated B-physics experiments, indicating a possible lepton-flavour universality violation in B-meson decays (CERN Courier April 2018 p23). Another is the long-standing tension in the measurement of the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon, for which an updated measurement is eagerly awaited (CERN Courier September 2018 p9).

One extension to the SM that has been proposed to explain these anomalies is an enlarged SM gauge group with an additional U(1) symmetry. Spontaneous breaking of this symmetry leads to the prediction of a new massive gauge boson, Zʹ. To keep the extended gauge symmetry free from quantum anomalies, only certain generation-dependent couplings are allowed. The model investigated by CMS promotes the difference in lepton numbers between the second and third generation to a local gauge symmetry, and until now has only been constrained slightly by experiment. Since the predicted Zʹ boson only couples to second- and third-generation leptons, the only way to produce it at the LHC is as final-state radiation off one of these leptons. The ideal source of muons for the purposes of this search is the decay of the SM Z boson to two muons, which can be measured with excellent mass resolution (~1%) in CMS. If a Zʹ boson exists, it will be radiated by one of the muons and decay subsequently to another pair of muons, leading to a final state with four muons.

Such a final state is also produced by a rare SM Z-boson decay to four muons mediated by an off-shell photon. The first observation of this rare decay of the SM Z boson in proton–proton collisions was reported by CMS in 2012. In order to reduce this background, the search exploits the resonant character of the new gauge boson’s di-muon decay. Events are selected that contain at least four muons with an invariant mass near the SM Z-boson mass. Di-muon candidates are then formed from muon pairs of opposite sign and a peak in their invariant mass distribution is sought, which would indicate the presence of a Zʹ particle.

The event yields are found to be consistent with the SM predictions (figure 1). Upper limits of the order of 10−8–10−7 are set on the branching fraction of a Z boson decaying to two muons and a Zʹ, with the latter also decaying into two muons, as a function of the Zʹ mass. This can be interpreted as a limit on the Zʹ particle’s coupling strength to muons, and provides the first dedicated limits on these Zʹ models at the LHC. Compared to other experiments and to indirect limits from the LHC obtained at lower centre-of-mass energies during Run 1, this search excludes a significant portion of parameter space favoured by the B-physics anomalies (figure 2). The analysis demonstrates the power and flexibility of the CMS experiment to adapt to and test new incoming physics models, which in turn react to previous experimental results, showing that experiments and theory go hand-in-hand.

Gaia finds evidence of old Milky Way merger

Many of the stars appearing in the night sky did not originate from within our galaxy, concludes a new study of data from the European Space Agency’s Gaia observatory. Instead, Gaia has found evidence that these stars formed in a smaller galaxy that merged with ours about 10 billion years ago.

Gaia was launched in 2013 with the aim of measuring the positions and distances of more than one billion astronomical objects (mainly stars) in and around our galaxy with unprecedented precision. Using Gaia data containing about seven million stars, Amina Helmi of the University of Groningen in the Netherlands and colleagues have found that a subset of these stars is different from the bulk of the stars in the Milky Way. Earlier research had shown that some stars in the galaxy’s inner stellar halo, which surrounds the central bulge and disk, have different chemical abundances from the bulge and disk stars (see figure). But the latest study found that these halo stars also exhibit orbits around the galactic centre that differ significantly from the rest of the stars.

The orbits of the stars in a galaxy typically follow that of the gas cloud in which they were born, which means that a proto-galaxy consisting of an orbiting gas cloud will produce stars orbiting along with the cloud. However, Helmi and co-workers show that many of the Milky Way’s halo stars orbit backwards relative to the rest of the galaxy, suggesting that their origin is probably different. The team then compared the Gaia observations with simulations in which the Milky Way merged in the past with a smaller galaxy with 25% of its mass, finding a remarkable similarity between the observed and simulated orbits.

Additional analysis of spectral data from APOGEE-2 (Apache Point Observatory Galactic Evolution Experiment), which is part of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, revealed that the halo stars contain fewer of the chemical elements that are produced in specific types of supernovae, indicating that they are significantly older than the bulk of the Milky Way’s stars.

Taken together, the results suggest that, after the smaller galaxy (named Gaia–Enceladus by the authors) merged with the Milky Way, it lost all the gas it needed to produce new stars. As a result, only the old stars survived and no new stars were born. The age of the youngest stars from Gaia–Enceladus – about 10 billion years – can therefore tell astronomers when the merger took place. A final piece of evidence that this dramatic event occurred comes from Gaia data of 13 star clusters orbiting the Milky Way at large distances. The orbits of these clusters, which contain millions of gravitationally bound stars, match those that would be expected for the remnants of Gaia–Enceladus.

The results, published in Nature, constitute one of the first major discoveries to emerge from Gaia data. They shed light on the origin of our galaxy and galaxy mergers in general, but much more will no doubt be learned from the vast amount of data that the satellite has gathered.

Λc+-baryon probes charm-quark hadronisation

The first measurement of Λc+-baryon production in lead–lead (Pb–Pb) collisions at an energy of 5.02 TeV per colliding nucleon pair was presented by the ALICE collaboration at the International Conference on Hard and Electromagnetic Probes of High-Energy Nuclear Collisions, held at Aix-Les-Bains from 30 September to 5 October. This measurement is essential to understand how charm-quark hadronisation is affected by the presence of the quark–gluon plasma (QGP) created in high-energy heavy-ion collisions.

Charm quarks are produced early in the collision, interact with the plasma as they propagate through it, and eventually hadronise. It has been suggested that the presence of many quarks in the final state of a heavy-ion collision may affect the hadronisation process: charm quarks could form hadrons by recombining with light quarks that happen to be nearby. In high-energy proton–proton (pp) collisions, the main hadronisation mechanism is through the formation of light quarks in a parton shower, known as “fragmentation”.

Λc+ pK0s decays, and their charge conjugates, were reconstructed by ALICE in Pb–Pb collisions at mid-rapidity (|y| <0.5) in the transverse momentum interval 6 < pT < 12 GeV/c and within 0–80% centrality range. The ratio of the production yields of Λc+ baryons (which consist of a charm quark and two light quarks) and D0 mesons (which contain a charm quark and a single, light antiquark) was measured. The Λc+/D0 ratio in Pb–Pb collisions is larger than those measured in minimum-bias pp collisions at 7 TeV and in p–Pb collisions at 5.02 TeV. The difference between the results in Pb–Pb and p–Pb collisions is about two times the standard deviation of the combined statistical and systematic uncertainties. The measured ratio in Pb–Pb collisions is also compatible with the Λc+/D0 ratio measured in gold–gold collisions at the Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collider at Brookhaven in the US. The measurement was compared with model calculations including different implementations of charm-quark hadronisation. The calculation with a pure coalescence scenario describes the experimental result, while adding a fragmentation contribution leads to a ratio that is smaller than that observed.

For this first measurement of Λc+-baryon production in Pb–Pb collisions, the uncertainties are still large and it is therefore not possible to draw a firm conclusion about the relative importance of recombination and fragmentation for charm-quark hadronisation. Moreover, it remains crucial to understand the charm-baryon production mechanisms in pp and p–Pb collisions, in particular, whether the assumptions made on the basis of e+e results also hold for fragmentation in hadronic collisions (CERN Courier March 2018 p12). The baryon-to-meson ratio has now been studied with light-flavour, strange and charm hadrons. All baryon-to-meson ratios in pp and p–Pb collisions show a characteristic pT dependence with an enhancement at intermediate pT values up to around 4 GeV/c, which still needs further investigation. 

Future datasets, to be collected during the heavy-ion run in 2018 and during LHC Run 3 and 4 after a major upgrade of the ALICE detector, will improve the Λc+-baryon production measurement. With a higher precision and a finer granularity in pT and centrality, these measurements are fundamental in determining the role of recombination for charm-quark hadronisation.

Doubly strange baryon observed in Japan

High-luminosity collisions of electrons and positrons at the KEKB accelerator in Japan have established the existence of a new baryon with strangeness S = –2, shedding light on the structure of doubly-strange hyperon resonances. In a preprint submitted to Physical Review Letters, researchers at KEKB’s Belle experiment report the first observation of the Ξ(1620)0 based on a 980 fb−1 data sample. The collaboration also found evidence for the slightly heavier Ξ(1690)0.

The constituent-quark model has been very successful in describing the Ξ or “cascade” baryon. Discovered in cosmic-ray experiments half a century ago, and corresponding to the ground state of the flavour-SU(3) octet, it contains one u or d quark plus two more massive quarks (the Ξ0 is made of one u and two s quarks). However, some observed excited states do not agree well with the Standard Model prediction. The study of such unusual states therefore probes the limitation of the quark model and could reveal unexpected aspects of quantum chromodynamics (QCD).

Belle researchers uncovered the resonance from its decay to Ξπ+ via Ξ+c Ξπ+π+, measuring its mass and width to be 1610.4 ± 6.0 (stat)  (syst) MeV/c2 and 59.9 ± 4.8 (stat) (syst) MeV, respectively. The values are consistent with those from previous sightings at other experiments, and the width of the Ξ(1620)0 turns out to be somewhat larger than that of the other exited Ξ states.

Experimental evidence for the Ξ(1620) Ξπ decay was first reported in Kp interactions in the 1970s, but there has been a lingering theoretical controversy about the interpretation of both the Ξ(1620) and Ξ(1690) states because the quark model predicts the first excited states of Ξ to have a mass of around 1800 MeV/c2. The latest results from Belle hint that these states represent a new class of exotic hadrons, writes the team: “The situation is similar to the two poles of the Λ(1405) and suggests the possibility of two poles in the S = −2 sector. Studying these states may explain the riddle about the Λ(1405); consequently, the interplay between the S = −1 and S = −2 states can help resolve this long-standing problem of hadron physics.”

The Belle detector has recently been superseded by Belle II at the upgraded SuperKEKB facility (CERN Courier September 2016 p32). Experiments at the LHC are also turning up new Ξ states. In 2012, CMS detected a Ξ*0b, while in 2014 the LHCb experiment discovered the Ξb and Ξ*b, and, in 2017, the doubly charmed Ξ++cc. Taken together, hadron-spectroscopy studies such as these are helping to piece together the complex process by which fundamental QCD objects combine into hadronic matter (CERN Courier April 2017 p31).

Machine powers down until 2021

The Large Hadron Collider’s 2018 proton physics run came to an end on 24 October, having accumulated an impressive dataset. The integrated luminosity delivered to both the ATLAS and CMS experiments reached an average of around 66 fb–1 for the year, 10% higher than the target. This corresponds to around 5 × 1015 inelastic collisions per experiment. LHCb accumulated just under 2.5 fb–1, while ALICE notched up 27 pb–1. The high figures are due to excellent machine availability and an instantaneous luminosity that regularly touched 2 × 1034 cm–2 s–1 in ATLAS and CMS – twice the nominal value.

The end of the proton run was followed by three and a half weeks of lead–lead collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of 5.02 TeV per colliding nucleon pair. Beginning on 5 November, this is the fourth lead–lead run since the collider began operation. During the last run of this type in 2015, the luminosity achieved was more than three and a half times higher than the LHC’s design luminosity, and the goals for 2018 are even more ambitious. Lead ions were also collided with protons in the LHC back in 2016.

This year’s shut-down marks the end of LHC Run 2, which began in 2015 and saw proton collisions take place at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV. The total data accumulated since the start of Run 2 corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 160 fb–1 to both ATLAS and CMS. From 10 December, CERN’s accelerator complex will enter “long shutdown 2” and undergo an extensive programme of renovation and upgrades, in particular for the High-Luminosity LHC. A week of LHC magnet training tests for operation at a future proton collision energy of 14 TeV is one of the first activities.

High performance 

In terms of performance, LHC Run 2 has been a major success for both the machine and its detectors. In terms of physics output, highlights from ATLAS and CMS include several key measurements of the Higgs boson’s properties, in particular its couplings to top and bottom quarks and to tau leptons, and numerous searches for physics beyond the Standard Model. LHCb has found a clutch of new hadrons, deepening our understanding of strong interactions, and has accumulated interesting results concerning the universality of lepton couplings. In the sphere of nuclear collisions, ALICE has dug even deeper into the extreme dynamics of the quark–gluon plasma – also finding strong evidence that this state is produced in proton–proton collisions.

This is just a flavour of the numerous results produced. So far, no firm signs of physics beyond the Standard Model have been seen at the LHC, but the majority of data collected during Run 2 are still to be analysed. Between now and the return of protons for Run 3 in 2021, the LHC experiment collaborations will throw everything they have at the data to see if anything new is lurking in the Run 2 data.

Plasma lenses promise smaller accelerators

An international team has made an advance towards more compact particle accelerators, demonstrating that beams can be focused via a technique called active plasma lensing without reducing the beam quality.

Building smaller particle accelerators has been a goal of the particle accelerator community for decades, both for basic research and applications such as radiotherapy. In addition to new accelerating mechanisms, smaller accelerators require novel ways to focus particle beams.

Active plasma lensing uses a large electric current to set up strong magnetic fields in a plasma that can focus high-energy beams over distances of centimetres, rather than metres as is the case for conventional magnet-based techniques. However, the large current also heats the plasma, preferentially heating the centre of the lens. This temperature gradient leads to a nonlinear magnetic field, an aberration, which degrades the particle-beam quality.

Using a high-quality 200 MeV electron beam at the CLEAR user facility at CERN, Carl A Lindstrøm of the University of Oslo, Norway, and collaborators recently made the first direct measurement of this aberration in an active plasma lens, finding it to be consistent with theory. More importantly, they discovered that this aberration can be suppressed by simply changing the gas used to make the plasma from a light gas (helium) to a heavier gas (argon). Changing the gas slows down the heat transfer so that the aberration does not have time to form, resulting in ideal, degradation-free focusing. It represents a significant step towards making active plasma lenses a standard accelerator component in the future, says the team.

CLEAR evolved from a test facility for the Compact Linear Collider (CLIC) called CTF3, which ended a successful programme in 2016. CLEAR offers general accelerator R&D and component studies for existing and possible future accelerator applications, such as high-gradient “X-band” acceleration methods (CERN Courier April 2018 p32), as well as prototyping and validation of accelerator components for the High-Luminosity LHC upgrade.

“Working at CLEAR was very efficient and fast-paced – not always the case in large-scale accelerator facilities,” says Lindstrøm. “Naturally, we hope to continue our plasma lens research at CLEAR. One exciting direction is probing the limits of how strong these lenses can be. This is clearly the lens of the future.”

ATLAS observes scattering of vector bosons

The exploration of W- and Z-boson interactions at the energy frontier probes the heart of the Brout–Englert–Higgs mechanism. The cross-section of longitudinal weak-boson scattering would diverge, resulting in meaningless values, were it not for the exact cancellation due to Higgs-boson contributions. The key processes for this exploration are the scattering between W and Z bosons emitted by quarks in proton–proton collisions, which are among the rarest processes of the Standard Model (SM) and that have remained inaccessible until very recently.

At the 2018 International Conference on High Energy Physics (ICHEP), held in Seoul on 4–11 July, ATLAS reported the observation of the W±W±jj final state, and, for the first time, the observation of the W±Zjj final state produced by pure electroweak processes, among which vector-boson scattering (VBS) is dominant. Observation of the electroweak production of W±W±jj was reported by the CMS collaboration in 2017.

ATLAS data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 36 fb–1 collected in 2015 and 2016 at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV were used. The two final states were searched for using W- and Z-boson decays to leptons (electrons or muons), featuring the typical signature of a centrally produced diboson system accompanied by two forward jets that are well separated in rapidity. The large invariant mass (mjj) of the two jets was used to isolate signal events from the overwhelming background arising from strong interactions. Further selection requirements, utilising additional features in the two channels, were necessary to suppress this background.

In the WWjj channel, the strong-interaction contribution to the production can be greatly reduced by selecting events with the same W-boson charge. Remaining backgrounds arise from processes in which leptons are misidentified or the charge of the lepton is incorrectly measured. The analysis therefore focused on the reduction and control of these backgrounds that are estimated from data. Additional background from incompletely reconstructed WZ events was estimated from simulations. The final mjj distribution of selected events is shown in the left-hand figure, with the signal accumulating at large mjj values. The analysis led to a significance of 6.9σ, qualifying for an observation.

Most of the background in the WZjj channel arises from strong-interaction processes contributing to the same final state. Kinematic variables that show distinct differences between electroweak and strong production were exploited to isolate the signal using a multivariate discriminant from a boosted decision tree (figure, right). The analysis leads to an observed significance of 5.6σ.

These observations open up a new era of exploration of a yet largely unknown part of the SM: the quartic couplings of weak bosons. The larger amounts of data collected during LHC Run 2 and future runs will allow for a detailed characterisation of VBS interactions using differential cross-section measurements. Such measurements combined with refined theory modelling provide sensitive tests of the electroweak sector of the SM, and may reveal signs of new physics.

Cosmic research poles apart

Every second, each square metre of the Earth is struck by thousands of charged particles travelling from deep space. It is now more than a century since cosmic rays were discovered, yet still they present major challenges to physics. The origin of high-energy cosmic rays is the biggest mystery, their energy too high to have been generated by astrophysical sources such as supernovae, pulsars or even black holes. But cosmic rays are also of interest beyond astrophysics. Recent studies at CERN’s CLOUD experiment, for example, suggest that cosmic rays may influence cloud cover through the formation of new aerosols, with important implications for the evolution of Earth’s climate.

This year, two independent missions were mounted in the Arctic and in Antarctica – Polarquest2018 and Clean2Antarctica – to understand more about the physics of high-energy cosmic rays. Both projects have a strong educational and environmental dimension, and are among the first to measure cosmic rays at such high latitudes.

Geomagnetic focus

Due to the shape of the geomagnetic field, the intensity of the charged cosmic radiation is higher at the poles than it is in equatorial regions. At the end of the 1920s it was commonly believed that cosmic rays were high-energy neutral particles (i.e. gamma rays), implying that the Earth’s magnetic field would not affect cosmic-ray intensity. However, early observations of the dependence of the cosmic-ray intensity on latitude rejected this hypothesis, showing that cosmic rays mainly consist of charged particles and leading to the first quantitative calculations of their composition.

The interest in measuring the cosmic-ray flux close to the poles is related to the fact that the geomagnetic field shields the Earth from low-energy charged cosmic rays, with an energy threshold (geomagnetic cut-off) depending on latitude, explains Mario Nicola Mazziotta, an INFN researcher and member of the Polarquest2018 team. “Although the geomagnetic cut-off decreases with increasing latitude, the cosmic-ray intensity at Earth reaches its maximum at latitudes of about 50–60°, where the cut-off is of a few GeV or less, and then seems not to grow anymore with latitude. This indicates that cosmic-ray intensity below a given energy is suppressed, due to solar effects, and makes the study of cosmic rays near the polar regions a very useful probe of solar activity.”

Polarquest2018 is a small cosmic-ray experiment that recently completed a six-week-long expedition to the Arctic Circle, on board a 18 m-long boat called Nanuq designed for sailing in extreme regions. The boat set out from Isafjordur, in North-East Iceland, on 22 July, circumnavigating the Svalbard archipelago in August and arriving in Tromsø on 4 September. The Polarquest2018 detectors reached 82 degrees north, shedding light on the soft component of cosmic rays trapped at the poles by Earth’s magnetic field.

Polarquest2018 is the result of the hard work of a team of a dozen people for more than a year, in addition to enthusiastic support from many other collaborators. Built at CERN by school students from Switzerland, Italy and Norway, Polarquest2018 encompasses three scintillator detectors to measure the cosmic-ray flux at different latitudes: one mounted on the Nanuq’s deck and two others installed in schools in Italy and Norway. The detectors had to operate with the limited electric power (12 W) that was available on board, both recording impinging cosmic rays and receiving GPS signals to timestamp each event with a precision of a few tens of nanoseconds. The detectors also had to be mechanically robust to resist the stresses from rough seas.

The three Polarquest2018 detectors join a network of around 60 others in Italy called the Extreme Energy Events – Science Inside Schools (EEE) experiment, proposed by Antonino Zichichi in 2004 and presently co-ordinated by the Italian research institute Centro Fermi in Rome, with collaborators including CERN, INFN and various universities. The detectors (each made of three multigap resistive plate chambers of about 2 m2 area) were built at CERN by high-school students and the large area of the EEE enables searches for very-long-distance correlations between cosmic-ray showers.

A pivotal moment in the arctic expedition came when the Nanuq arrived close to the south coast of the Svalbard archipelago and was sailing in the uncharted waters of the Recherche Fjord. While the crew admired a large school of belugas, the boat struck the shallow seabed, damaging its right dagger board and leaving the craft perched at a 45° incline. The crew fought to get the Nanuq free, but in the end had to wait almost 12 hours for the tide to rise again. Amazingly, explains Polarquest2018 project leader Paola Catapano of CERN, the incident had its advantages. “It allowed the team to check the algorithms used to correct the raw data on cosmic rays for the inclination and rolling of the boat, since the data clearly showed a decrease in the number of muons due to a reduced acceptance.”

Analysis of the Polarquest2018 data will take a few months, but preliminary results show no significant increase in the cosmic-ray flux, even at high latitudes. This is contrary to what one could naively expect considering the high density of the Earth’s magnetic field lines close to the pole, explains Luisa Cifarelli, president of Centro Fermi in Rome. “The lack of increase in the cosmic flux confirms the hypothesis formulated by Lemaître in 1932, with much stronger experimental evidence than was available up to now, and with data collected at latitudes where no published results exist,” she says. The Polarquest2018 detector has also since embarked on a road trip to measure cosmic rays all along the Italian peninsula, collecting data over a huge latitude interval.

Heading south

Meanwhile, 20,000 km south, a Dutch expedition to the South Pole called Clean2Antarctica has just got under way, carrying a small cosmic-ray experiment from Nikhef on board a vehicle called Solar Voyager. The solar-powered cart, built from recycled 3D-printed household plastics, will make the first ground measurements in Antarctica of the muon decay rate and of charged particles from extensive-air cosmic-ray showers. Cosmic rays will be measured by a roof-mounted scintillation device as the cart makes a 1200 km, six-week-long journey from the edge of the Antarctic icefields to the geometric South Pole.

The team taking the equipment across the Antarctic to the South Pole comprises mechanical engineer Ter Velde and his wife Liesbeth, who initiated the Clean2Antarctica project and are both active ocean sailors. Back in the warmer climes of the Netherlands, researchers from Nikhef will remotely monitor for any gradients in the incoming particle fluxes as the magnetic field lines are converging closer to the pole. In theory, the magnetic field will funnel charged particles from the high atmosphere to the Earth’s surface, leading to higher fluxes near the pole. But the incoming muon signal should not be affected, as this is produced by high-energy particles producing air showers of charged particles, explains Nikhef project scientist Bob van Eijk. “But this is experimental physics and a first, so we will just do the measurements and see what comes out,” he says.

The scintillation panel used is adapted from the HiSPARC rooftop cosmic-ray detectors that Nikhef has been providing in high schools in the Netherlands, the UK and Denmark for the past 15 years. Under professional supervision, students and teachers build these roof-box-sized detectors themselves and run the detection programme and data-analysis in their science classes. Some 140 rooftop stations are online and many thousands of pupils have been involved over the years, stimulating interest in science and research.

Pristine backdrop

The panel being taken to Antarctica is a doubled-up version that is half the usual area of the HiSPARC panels due to strict space restrictions. Two gyroscope systems will correct for any changes in the level of the panel while traversing the Antarctic landscape. All the instruments are solar powered, with the power coming from photovoltaic panels on two additional carts pulled by the main electric vehicle. The double detection depth of the panels will allow for muon-decay detection by photomultiplier tubes as well as regular cosmic-ray particles such as electrons and photons. Data from the experiment will be relayed regularly by satellite from the Solar Voyager vehicle so that analysis can take place in parallel, and will be made public through a dedicated website.

The Clean2Antarctic expedition set off in mid-November from Union Glacier Camp station near the Antarctic Peninsula. It is sponsored by Dutch companies and from crowd funding, and has benefitted from extensive press and television coverage. The trip will take the team across bleak snow planes and altitudes up to 2835 m and, despite being the height of Antarctic summer, temperatures could be down to –30 °C. The mission aims to use the pristine backdrop of Antarctica to raise public awareness about waste reduction and recycling.

“This is one of the rare occasions that a scientific outreach programme, with genuine scientific questions targeting high-school students as prime investigators, teams up with an idealist group that tries to raise awareness on environmental issues regarding circular economy,” says van Eijk. “The plastic for the vehicles was collected by primary-school kids, while three groups of young researchers formed ‘think tanks’ to generate solutions to questions about environmental issues that industrial sponsors/partners have raised.” Polarquest2018 had a similar goal, and its MantaNet project became the first to assess the presence and distribution of microplastics in the Arctic waters north of Svalbard at a record latitude of 82.7° north. According to MantaNet project leader Stefano Alliani: “One of the conclusions already drawn by sheer observation is that even at such high latitudes the quantity of macro plastic loitering in the most remote and wildest beaches of our planet is astonishing.”

bright-rec iop pub iop-science physcis connect