Comsol -leaderboard other pages

Topics

From sea quarks to sea shanties

Social media apps

After being shown the app by her mother during lockdown, ATLAS physicist Clara Nellist downloaded TikTok and created her first two “shorts” in January this year. Jumping on a TikTok trend, the first saw her sing a CERN-themed sea shanty, while the second was an informal introduction to her page as she meandered around a park near the CERN site. Together, these two videos now total almost 600,000 views. Six months later, another ATLAS physicist, James Beacham, joined the platform, also with a quick introduction video explaining his work while using the ATLAS New Small Wheels as a backdrop. The video now has over 1.7 million views. With TikTok videos giving other social-media channels a run for their money, soon more of the high-energy physics community may want to join the rising media tide.

Surfing the wave

From blogs in the early 2000s through to Twitter and YouTube today, user-generated ‘Web 2.0’ platforms have allowed scientists to discuss their work and share their excitement directly. In the case of particle physics, researchers and their labs have never been within closer reach to the public, with a tour of the Large Hadron Collider always just a few clicks away. In 2005, as blogs were mushrooming, CERN and other players in particle physics joined forces to create Quantum Diaries. As the popularity of blogs began to dwindle towards the late noughties, CERN hopped on the next wave, joining YouTube in 2007 and Twitter in 2008 – at a time when public interest in the LHC was at its peak. CERN’s Twitter account currently boasts an impressive 2.5 million followers.

While joining later than some other laboratories, Fermilab caught onto a winning formula on YouTube, with physicist Don Lincoln fronting a long-standing educational series that began in 2011 and still runs today, attracting millions of views. Most major particle-physics laboratories also have a presence on Facebook and Instagram, with CERN joining the platforms in 2011 and 2014 respectively, not to mention LinkedIn, where CERN also possesses a significant following.

Particle physics laboratories are yet to launch themselves on TikTok. But that hasn’t stopped others from creating videos about particle physics, and not always “on message”. Type ‘CERN’ into the TikTok search bar and you are met with almost a 50/50 mix of informative videos and conspiracy theories – and even then, some of the former are merely debunking the latter. Is it time for institutions to get in on the trend?

Rising to the moment

Nellist, who has 123,000 followers on TikTok after less than nine months on the site, believes that it’s the human aspect and uniqueness of her content that has caused the quick success. “I started because I wanted to humanise science – people don’t realise that normal humans work at CERN. When I started there was nobody else at CERN doing it.” Beacham also uses CERN as a way of capturing attention, as illustrated in his weekly livestreams to his 230,000 followers. “If someone is scrolling and sees someone sitting in a DUNE cryostat discussing science, they’re going to stop and check it out,” he says. Beacham sees himself as a filmmaker, rather than a “TikTok-er”, and flexes his bachelor’s degree in film studies with longer form videos that take him across the CERN campus. “There is a desire on TikTok to know about CERN,” he says.

Clara Nellist

TikTok is different to other social-media platforms in several ways, one being  incompatibility. While a single piece of media such as a video can be shared across YouTube, Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, etc., this same media would not work on TikTok. Videos can also only be a maximum of three minutes, although the majority are shorter. This encourages concise productions, with a lot of information put across in a short period of time. Arguably the biggest difference is that TikTok insists that every video is in portrait mode – creating a feeling of authenticity and an intimate environment. YouTube and Instagram are now following suit with their portrait-mode ‘YouTube Shorts’, and ‘Instagram Reels’ respectively, with CERN already using the latter to create quick and informative clips that have attracted large audiences.

Nellist and Beacham, both engaging physicists in their own right who the viewer feels they can trust, create a perfect blend for TikTok. While there are some topics that will always generate more interest, they have a core audience that consistently returns for all videos. This gives a strong sense of editorial freedom, says Nellist. “While it is important to be aware of views, I get to make what I want.”

Changing demographics

When CERN joined Twitter in 2008, says James Gillies, head of CERN communications at the time, young people were a key factor as CERN tried to maximise its digital footprint. But things have changed since then. It is estimated that there are over 1 billion active TikTok users per month, and according to data firm Statista, in the US almost 50% of them are aged 30 and under, with other reports stating that up to 32.5% of users are between the ages of 10 and 19. Statista also estimates that only 24% of today’s Twitter users are under 25 – the so-called ‘Gen-Z’ who will fund and possibly work on future colliders.

If you want to lead the conversation, you have to be part of it

James Gillies

Another reason for CERN to enter the Twitter-verse (and which facilitated the creation of Quantum Diaries), says Gillies, was to allow CERN to take their communication into their own hands. Although Nellist and Beacham are already encouraging this discussion on TikTok, they are not official CERN communication channels. Were they to decide to stop or talk about different topics, it would be hard to find any positive high-energy physics discussions on the most popular app on the planet.

Whilst Nellist believes CERN should be joining the platform, she urges that someone “who knows about it” should be dedicated to creating the content, as it is obvious to TikTok audiences when someone doesn’t understand it. Beacham states, “humans don’t respond to ideas as much as they respond to people.” Creators have their own unique styles and personalities that the viewers enjoy. So, if a large institution were to join, how would it create this personal environment?

James Beacham

The ATLAS experiment is currently the only particle-physics experiment to be found on the platform. The content is less face-to-face and more focused on showing the detector and how it works – similar in style to a CERN Instagram story. Despite being active for a similar amount of time as Nellist and Beacham, however, the account has significantly fewer followers. Nellist, who runs the ATLAS TikTok account, thinks there is room for both personal and institutional creators on the platform, though the content should be different. Beacham agrees, stating that it should show individual scientists expressing information in an off-the-cuff way. “There is a huge opportunity to do something great with it, there are thousands of things you could do. There are amazing visuals that CERN is capable of creating that can grab a viewer’s attention.”

 

Keeping up

There may be some who scoff at the idea of CERN joining a platform that has a public image of creating dance crazes rather than educational content. It is easy to forget that when first established, YouTube was seen as the place for funny cat videos, while Twitter was viewed as an unnecessary platform for people to tell others what they had for breakfast. Now these two platforms are the only reason some may know CERN exists, and unfortunately, not always for the right reasons.

Social media gives physicists and laboratories the opportunity to contact and influence audiences more directly than traditional channels. The challenge is to keep up with the pace of change. It’s clearly early days for a platform that only took off in 2018. Even NASA, which has the largest number of social-media followers of any scientific institution, is yet to launch an official TikTok channel. But, says Gillies, “If you want to lead the conversation, you have to be part of it.”

Rare isotopes aplenty at FRIB

The 400 kW SRF linac

The $730 million Facility for Rare Isotope Beams (FRIB) at Michigan State University (MSU) is scheduled to come online in early 2022 – a game-changer in every sense for the US and international nuclear-physics communities. With peer review and approval of the first round of experimental proposals now complete, an initial cohort of scientists from 25 countries is making final preparations to exploit FRIB’s unique capabilities. Their goal: to open up new frontiers in the fundamental study of rare and unstable isotopes as well as identifying promising candidate isotopes for real-world applications. 

The engine-room of the FRIB scientific programme is an all-new 400 kW superconducting radiofrequency (SRF) linac. In short: the world’s most powerful heavy-ion driver accelerator, firing beams of stable isotopes at targets of heavier nuclei (for example, carbon or beryllium). Amid the chaos of flying particles, two nuclei will occasionally collide, fusing to form a rare and unstable isotope – a process that ultimately delivers high-intensity beams of rare isotopes to FRIB’s experimental end-stations and a suite of scientific instruments. 

Funded by the US Department of Energy Office of Science (DOE-SC), and supported by MSU cost-share and contributions, FRIB will operate as a traditional big-science user facility, with beam-time granted via merit review of proposals and access open to all interested researchers. Here, FRIB’s scientific director, Bradley Sherrill, tells CERN Courier how the laboratory is gearing up for “go-live” and the importance of wide-ranging engagement with the international user community, industry and other rare-isotope facilities.

What are the overarching objectives of the FRIB scientific mission?

Bradley Sherrill

There are four main strands to the FRIB science programme. For starters, user experiments will generate a wealth of data to advance our understanding of the nucleus – how it’s put together and how we can develop theoretical nuclear models and their approximations. At the same time, the research programme will yield unique insights on the origins of the chemical elements in the universe, providing access to most of the rare isotopes involved in extreme astrophysical processes such as supernovae and neutron-star mergers. Other scientists, meanwhile, will use isotopes produced at FRIB to devise experiments that look beyond the Standard Model, searching for subtle indications of hidden interactions and minutely broken symmetries. Finally, FRIB will generate research quantities of rare isotopes to feed into R&D efforts on next-generation applications – from functional medical imaging to safer nuclear reactors and advanced detector technologies.

What is FRIB’s biggest differentiator?  

The 400 kW SRF linac is the heart of FRIB’s value proposition to the research community, opening up access to a much broader spectrum of rare isotopes than hitherto possible – in fact, approximately 80% of the isotopes predicted to exist. It is worth noting, though, that FRIB does not exist in isolation. It’s part of a global research ecosystem, with a network of collaborations ongoing with other rare-isotope facilities – among them RIKEN’s RI Beam Factory in Japan, RAON in Korea, ISOLDE at CERN, FAIR in Germany, GANIL in France and ISAC at TRIUMF in Canada. Collectively, FRIB and this global network of laboratories are well placed to deliver unprecedented – and complementary – advances across the nuclear-science landscape over the coming decades.

Is it realistic to expect broader commercial opportunities to emerge from FRIB’s research programme? 

There’s a high likelihood of FRIB yielding spin-off technologies and commercial applications down the line. One of the game-changers with FRIB is the quantities of rare isotopes the beamline can produce with high efficiency – a production scheme that enables us to make a broad swathe of isotopes relatively quickly and with high purity. That capability, in turn, will enable potential early-adopters in industry to fast-track the evaluation of novel applications and, where appropriate, to figure out how to produce the isotopes of interest at scale (see “FRIB’s bumper harvest will fuel applied science and innovation”). 

How is FRIB engaging with the scientific user community across academia, industry and government agencies? 

FRIB enjoys strong links with its future users – both here in the US and internationally – and meets with them regularly at planning events to identify and coordinate research opportunities. Earlier this year, in response to our first call for proposals, we received 82 project submissions and six letters of intent from 130 institutions across 30 countries. Those science proposals were subsequently peer-reviewed by the FRIB Programme Advisory Committee (PAC), an international group of nuclear science experts which I convene, to yield an initial set of experiments that will get underway once FRIB commences user operations in early 2022. 

Those PAC-recommended experiments align with national science priorities across the four FRIB priority areas: properties of rare isotopes; nuclear astrophysics; fundamental interactions; and applications for society. The headline numbers saw 34 (out of 82 requested) experiments approved with a projected 4122 facility-use hours. There are 88 institutions, 24 US states and 25 countries represented in the initial experimental programme.

FRIB’s bumper harvest will fuel applied science and innovation

An excess of useful radioisotopes will be formed as FRIB fulfils its basic science mission of providing rare-isotope beams to feed a broad-scope international user programme. For the FRIB beams to reach high purity, though, the vast majority of these “surplus” isotopes will end up discarded in a water-filled beam dump – stranded assets that go unused and remain largely unexplored. 

With this in mind, the DOE-SC Office of Nuclear Physics, through the DOE Isotope Programme, has awarded FRIB scientists $13 million in funding over the next four years to build up FRIB’s isotope harvesting capabilities. The hope is that systematic recovery of the surplus isotopes – without impacting FRIB’s primary users – could open up novel lines of enquiry in applied research – from biochemistry to nuclear medicine, and from radiothermal generators to nuclear-weapons stockpile stewardship.

“This grant is about broadening the scientific impact of FRIB,” says Greg Severin, lead investigator for the harvesting project at FRIB. “While physicists at FRIB are making ground-breaking fundamental discoveries, our team will be supporting exciting opportunities in applied science.”

In 2018, the DOE-SC awarded Severin and colleagues an initial grant to prove that isotope harvesting is feasible. Their proof-of-concept involved building a small-scale isotope harvester in FRIB’s predecessor, the National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory at MSU. 

Now, with follow-on funding secured, Severin’s team is scaling up, with construction of a dedicated Isotope Harvesting Vault at FRIB in the works and set for completion in 2024.

See also “Isotope harvesting at FRIB: additional opportunities for scientific discovery” (J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 2019 46 100501). 

What are the opportunities for early-career scientists and engineers at FRIB?

Developing the talent pipeline is part of the organisational DNA here at FRIB. There’s a structured educational framework to pass on the expertise and experience of senior FRIB staff to the next generation of researchers, engineers and technicians in nuclear science. MSU’s Accelerator Science and Engineering Traineeship (ASET) programme is a case in point. ASET leverages multidisciplinary expertise from FRIB and MSU colleagues to support specialisation in four key areas: physics and engineering of large accelerators; SRF technology; radiofrequency power engineering; and large-scale cryogenic systems. 

Theres a high likelihood of FRIB yielding new spin-off technologies as well as commercial applications

Many MSU ASET students supplement their courses through participation in the US Particle Accelerator School, a national programme that provides graduate-level training and workforce development in the science of particle beams and associated accelerator technologies. At a more specialist level, there’s also the MSU Cryogenic Initiative, a unique educational collaboration between the university’s college of engineering and FRIB’s cryogenics team. Meanwhile, we continue to prioritise development of a more diverse workforce, partnering with several academic institutions that traditionally serve under-represented groups to broaden participation in the FRIB programme. 

In what ways does FRIB ensure a best-practice approach to facilities management? 

Sustainability and continuous improvement underpin all FRIB working practices. We are an ISO14001-registered organisation, which means we measure ourselves against an international standard specifying requirements for effective environmental management. That’s reflected, for example, in our use of energy-efficient superconducting technologies, and also our efforts to minimise any helium wastage through an exhaustive capture, recovery and reuse scheme within FRIB’s cryogenic plant. 

We also have an ISO 9001-registered quality management system that guides how we address scientific user needs; an ISO 45001-registered occupational health and safety management system to keep our workers safe; and an ISO 27001-registered information security management system.

How important is FRIB’s relationship with industry?

Our strategic partnerships with industry are also significant in driving organisational efficiencies. The use of standard industry components wherever possible reduces maintenance and training requirements, minimises the need for expensive product inventory, and lowers our operational costs. We engage with manufacturers on a co-development basis, fast-tracking innovation and knowledge transfer so that they are able to produce core enabling technologies for FRIB at scale – whether that’s accelerator cavities, superconducting magnets, or vacuum and cryogenic subsystems.  

On your way to Cyclotron Road?

Rachel Slaybaugh

Entrepreneurial scientists and engineers take note: the next round of applications to Cyclotron Road’s two-year fellowship programme will open in the fourth quarter, offering a funded path for early-stage start-ups in “hard tech” (i.e. physical hardware rather than software) to fast-track development of their applied research innovations. Now in its sixth year, Cyclotron Road is a division of the US Department of Energy’s Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley, California) and is run in partnership with non-profit Activate, a specialist provider of entrepreneurship education and training. 

Successful applicants who navigate the rigorous merit-review process will receive $100,000 of research support for their project as well as a stipend, health insurance and access to Berkeley Lab’s world-class research facilities and scientific expertise. CERN Courier gets the elevator pitch from Rachel Slaybaugh, Cyclotron Road division director. 

Summarise your objectives for Cyclotron Road

Our mission is to empower science innovators to develop their ideas from concept to first product, positioning them for broad societal impact in the long term. We create the space for fellows to commercialise their ideas by giving them direct access to the world-leading scientists and facilities at Berkeley Lab. Crucially, we reinforce that support with a parallel curriculum of specialist entrepreneurship education from our programme partner Activate. 

What are the benefits of embedding the fellowship programme at Berkeley Lab?

Cyclotron Road is not a one-size-fits-all programme, so the benefits vary from fellow to fellow. Some of the fellows and their teams only loosely make use of Berkeley Lab services, while others will embed in a staff scientist’s lab and engage in close collaborative R&D work. The value proposition is that our fellows have access to Berkeley Lab and its resources but can choose what model works best for them. It seems to work: since 2015, Cyclotron Road fellows have collaborated with more than 70 Berkeley Lab scientists, while the organisations they’ve founded have collectively raised more than $360 million in follow-on funding. 

What do you look for in prospective Cyclotron Road fellows? 

We want smart, talented individuals with a passion to develop and grow their own early-stage hard-tech venture. Adaptability is key: Cyclotron Road fellows need to have the technical and intellectual capability to pivot their business plan if needed. As such, our fellows are collaborative team players by default, coachable and hungry to learn. They don’t need to take all the advice they’re given in the programme, but they do need to be open-minded and willing to listen to a range of viewpoints regarding technology innovation and commercial positioning. 

Explain the role of Activate in the professional development of fellows 

Activate is an essential partner in the Cyclotron Road mission. Its team handles the parallel programme of entrepreneurship education, including an onboarding bootcamp, weekly mentoring and quarterly “deep-dives” on all aspects of technology and business development. The goal is to turn today’s talented scientists and engineers into tomorrow’s technology CEOs and CTOs. Activate also has staff to curate strategic relationships for our fellows, helping start-ups connect with investors, industry partners and equipment suppliers. That’s reinforced by the opportunity to link up with the amazing companies in Cyclotron Road’s alumni network.

How does Cyclotron Road benefit Berkeley Lab?

There are several upsides. We’re bringing entrepreneurship and commercial thinking into the lab, helping Berkeley scientists build bridges with these new technology companies – and the innovators driving them. That has paybacks in terms of future funding proposals, giving our researchers a better understanding of how to position their research from an applications perspective. The knowledge transfer between Cyclotron Road fellows and Berkeley Lab scientists is very much a two-way process: while fellows progress their commercial ideas, they are often sparking new lines of enquiry among their collaborators here at Berkeley Lab. 

How are you broadening participation?

Fellows receive a yearly living stipend of $80,000 to $110,000, health insurance, a relocation stipend and a travel allowance – all of which means they’re able to focus full-time on their R&D. Our priority is to engage a diverse community of researchers – not just those individuals who already have a high net worth or access to a friends-and-family funding round. We’re building links with universities and labs outside the traditional technology hot-spots like Silicon Valley, Boston and Seattle, as well as engaging institutions that serve under-represented minorities. Worth adding that Cyclotron Road welcomes international applicants in a position to relocate to California for two years.  

Further information on the Cyclotron Road fellowship programme: https://cyclotronroad.lbl.gov/.

Arthur M Poskanzer 1931–2021

Art Poskanzer

Arthur M (Art) Poskanzer, distinguished senior scientist emeritus at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), passed away peacefully on 30 June 2021, two days after his 90th birthday. Art had a distinguished career in nuclear physics and chemistry. He made important discoveries of the properties of unstable nuclei and was a pioneer in the study of nuclear collisions at very high energies. 

Born in New York City, Art received his degree in physics and chemistry from Harvard in 1953, an MA from Columbia in 1954, and a PhD in Chemistry from MIT in 1957 under Charles D Coryell. He spent the first part of his career studying the properties of nuclei far from stability produced in high-energy proton collisions. After graduating from MIT, he joined Gerhard Friedlander’s group at Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), which was using the Cosmotron to produce beta-delayed proton emitters and neutron-rich light nuclei. In 1966 he moved to the Lawrence Radiation Laboratory (now LBNL) and continued to study nuclei far from stability at the Bevatron in collaboration with Earl Hyde, Joe Cerny and others. He also began his long connection to research in Europe as a Guggenheim fellow at Orsay in 1970–1971, during which he worked with Robert Klapisch’s group on a ground-breaking experiment at the CERN Proton Synchrotron measuring the masses of sodium isotopes.

Soon after Art’s return to Berkeley, beams from the SuperHILAC were injected into the Bevatron, creating the Bevalac, the world’s first high-energy nuclear accelerator. Together with Hans Gutbrod he led the Plastic Ball Project. Analysis of its data in 1984 by Art and Hans Georg Ritter identified directed flow, the first definitive demonstration of the collective behaviour of nuclear matter in nuclear collisions. In 1986 the experiment was moved to CERN and the collaboration with GSI continued with a series of experiments at the Super Proton Synchrotron. During these years, Art made two more extended visits to CERN as a Senior Alexander von Humbold Fellow: first in 1986–1987 working on the WA80 experiment, and then in 1995–1996 on NA49.

From 1990 to 1995 Art was the founding head of LBNL’s relativistic nuclear collisions programme, bringing together local groups to plan an experiment at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) under construction at BNL. This resulted in the proposal for STAR, one of the two large multi-purpose RHIC detectors. Art stepped down as programme head in 1995 and returned to research, authoring a seminal paper with Sergey Voloshin on methods for flow analysis and leading the measurement of elliptic flow by STAR. After his retirement in 2002, he remained active for a further decade, leading the successful search for higher order flow components at STAR, and enthusiastically mentoring many postdocs and young scientists. 

Art was a well-known and well-loved member of the heavy-ion community. For his work on nuclei far from stability, he was awarded the Nuclear Chemistry Prize of the American Chemical Society in 1980. For the discovery of collective flow, he was awarded the Tom Bonner Prize of the American Physical Society in 2008. This rare “double” is a lasting tribute to his half-century career at the frontiers of nuclear science.

Science Gateway under construction

Science Gateway foundation stone

On 21 June, officials and journalists gathered at CERN to mark “first stone” for Science Gateway, CERN’s new flagship project for science education and outreach. Due to open in 2023, Science Gateway will increase CERN’s capacity to welcome visitors of all ages from near and afar. Hundreds of thousands of people per year will have the opportunity to engage with CERN’s discoveries and technology, guided by the people who make it possible.

The project has environmental sustainability at its core. Designed by renowned architect Renzo Piano, the carbon-neutral building will bridge the Route de Meyrin and be surrounded by a freshly planted 400-tree forest. Its five linked pavilions will feature a 900-seat auditorium, immersive spaces, laboratories for hands-on activities for visitors from age five upwards, and many other interactive learning opportunities.

“I would like to express my deepest gratitude to the many partners in our Member and Associate Member States and beyond who are making the CERN Science Gateway possible, in particular to our generous donors,” said CERN Director-General Fabiola Gianotti during her opening speech. “We want the CERN Science Gateway to inspire all those who come to visit with the beauty and the values of science.”

Surveyors eye up a future collider

Levelling measurements

CERN surveyors have performed the first geodetic measurements for a possible Future Circular Collider (FCC), a prerequisite for high-precision alignment of the accelerator’s components. The millimetre-precision measurements are one of the first activities undertaken by the FCC feasibility study, which was launched last year following the recommendation of the 2020 update of the European strategy for particle physics. During the next three years, the study will explore the technical and financial viability of a 100 km collider at CERN, for which the tunnel is a top priority. Geology, topography and surface infrastructure are the key constraints on the FCC tunnel’s position, around which civil engineers will design the optimal route, should the project be approved.

The FCC would cover an area about 10 times larger than the LHC, in which every geographical reference must be pinpointed with unprecedented precision. To provide a reference coordinate system, in May the CERN surveyors, in conjunction with ETH Zürich, the Federal Office of Topography Swisstopo, and the School of Engineering and Management Vaud, performed geodetic levelling measurements along an 8 km profile across the Swiss–French border south of Geneva.

Such measurements have two main purposes. The first is to determine a high-precision surface model, or “geoid”, to map the height above sea level in the FCC region. The second purpose is to improve the present reference system, whose measurements date back to the 1980s when the tunnel housing the LHC was built.

“The results will help to evaluate if an extrapolation of the current LHC geodetic reference systems and infrastructure is precise enough, or if a new design is needed over the whole FCC area,” says Hélène Mainaud Durand, group leader of CERN’s geodetic metrology group.

The FCC feasibility study, which involves more than 140 universities and research institutions from 34 countries, also comprises technological, environmental, engineering, political and economic considerations. It is due to be completed by the time the next strategy update gets under way in the middle of the decade. Should the outcome be positive, and the project receive the approval of CERN’s member states, civil-engineering works could start as early as the 2030s.

Web code auctioned as crypto asset

The web’s original source code

Time-stamped files stated by Tim Berners-Lee to contain the original source code for the web and digitally signed by him, have sold for US$5.4 million at auction. The files were sold as a non-fungible token (NFT), a form of a crypto asset that uses blockchain technology to confer uniqueness.

The web was originally conceived at CERN to meet the demand for automated information-sharing between physicists spread across universities and institutes worldwide. Berners-Lee wrote his first project proposal in March 1989, and the first website, which was dedicated to the World Wide Web project itself and hosted on Berners-Lee’s NeXT computer, went live in the summer of 1991. Less than two years later, on 30 April 1993, and after several iterations in development, CERN placed version three of the software in the public domain. It deliberately did so on a royalty-free, “no-strings-attached” basis, addressing the memo simply “To whom it may concern.”

The seed that led CERN to relinquish ownership of the web was planted 70 years ago, in the CERN Convention, which states that results of its work were to be “published or otherwise made generally available” – a culture of openness that continues to this day.

The auction offer describes the NFT as containing approximately 9555 lines of code, including implementations of the three languages and protocols that remain fundamental to the web today: HTML (Hypertext Markup Language), HTTP (Hypertext Transfer Protocol) and URIs (Uniform Resource Identifiers). The lot also includes an animated visualisation of the code, a letter written by Berners-Lee reflecting on the process of creating it, and a Scalable Vector Graphics representation of the full code created from the original files.

Bidding for the NFT, which auction- house Sotheby’s claims is its first-ever sale of a digital-born artefact, opened on 23 June and attracted a total of 51 bids. The sale will benefit initiatives that Berners-Lee and his wife Rosemary Leith support, stated a Sotheby’s press release.

Climate Change and Energy Options for a Sustainable Future

Climate Change and Energy Options for a Sustainable Future

In Climate Change and Energy Options for a Sustainable Future, nuclear physicists Dinesh Kumar Srivastava and V S Ramamurthy explore global policies for an eco-friendly future. Facing the world’s increasing demand for energy, the authors argue for the replacement of fossil fuels with a new mixture of green energy sources including wind energy, solar photovoltaics, geothermal energy and nuclear energy. Srivastava is a theoretical physicist and Ramamurthy is an experimental physicist with research interests in heavy-ion physics and the quark–gluon plasma. Together, they analyse solutions offered by science and technology with a clarity that will likely surpass the expectations of non-expert readers. Following a pedagogical approach with vivid illustra­tions, the book offers an in-depth description of how each green-energy option could be integrated into a global-energy strategy. 

In the first part of the book, the authors provide a wealth of evidence demonstrating the pressing reality of climate change and the fragility of the environment. Srivastava and Ramamurthy then examine unequal access to energy across the globe. There should be no doubt that human wellbeing is decided by the rate at which power is consumed, they write, and providing enough energy to everyone on the planet to reach a human-development index of 0.8, which is defined by the UN as high human development, calls for about 30 trillion kWh per year – roughly double the present global capacity. 

Human wellbeing is decided by the rate at which power is consumed

Srivastava and Ramamurthy present the basic principles of alternative renewable sources, and offer many examples, including agrivoltaics in Africa, a floating solar-panel station in California and wind-turbines in the Netherlands and India. Drawing on their own expertise, they discuss nuclear energy and waste-management, accelerator-driven subcritical systems, and the use of high-current electron accelerators for water purification. The book then finally turns to sustainability, showing by means of a wealth of scientific data that increasing the supply of renewable energy, and reducing carbon-intensive energy sources, can lead to sustainable power across the globe, both reducing global-warming emissions and stabilising energy prices for a fairer economy. The authors stress that any solution should not compromise quality of life or development opportunities in developing countries. 

This book could not be more timely. It is an invaluable resource for scientists, policymakers and educators.

Anatoly Vasilievich Efremov 1933–2021

Anatoly Efremov

On 1 January, after a long struggle with a serious illness, Anatoly Vasilievich Efremov of the Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics (BLTP) at JINR, Dubna, Russia, passed away. He was an outstanding physicist, and a world expert in quantum field theory and elementary particle physics.

Anatoly Efremov was born in Kerch, Crimea, to the family of a naval officer. Since childhood, he retained his love for the sea and was an excellent yachtsman. After graduating from Moscow Engineering Physics Institute in 1958, where among his teachers were Isaak Pomeranchuk and his master’s thesis advisor Yakov Smorodinsky, he started working at BLTP JINR. At the time, Dmitrij Blokhintsev was JINR director. Anatoly always considered him as his teacher, as he did Dmitry Shirkov under whose supervision he defended his PhD thesis “Dispersion theory of low-energy scattering of pions” in 1962.

In 1971, Anatoly defended his DSc dissertation “High-energy asymptotics of Feynman diagrams”. The underlying work immediately found application in the factorisation of hard processes in quantum chromodynamics (QCD), which is now the theoretical basis of all hard-hadronic processes. Of particular note are his 1979 articles (written together with his PhD student A V Radyushkin) about the asymptotic behaviour of the pion form factor in QCD, and the evolution equation for hard exclusive processes, which became known as the ERBL (Efremov–Radyushkin–Brodsky–Lepage) equation. Proving the factorisation of hard processes enabled many subtle effects in QCD to be described, in particular parton correlations, which became known as the ETQS (Efremov–Teryaev–Qiu–Sterman) mechanism.

During the past three decades, Efremov, together with his students and colleagues, devoted his attention to several problems: the proton spin; the role of the axial anomaly and spin of gluons in the spin structure of a nucleon; correlations of the spin of partons; and momenta of particles in jets (“handedness”). These effects served as the theoretical basis for polarised particle experiments at RHIC at Brookhaven, the SPS at CERN and the new NICA facility at JINR. Anatoly was a member of the COMPASS collaboration at the SPS, where he helped to measure the effects he had predicted.

In 1976 he suggested the first model for the production of cumulative particles at x > 1 off nuclei. Within QCD, Efremov was the first to develop the concept of nuclear quark–parton structure function, which entails the presence in the nucleus of a hard collective quark sea. This naturally explains both the EMC nuclear effect and cumulative particle production, and unambiguously indicates the existence of multi- quark density fluctuations (fluctons) – a prediction that was later confirmed and led to the so-called nuclear super-scaling phenomenon. Today, similar effects of fluctons or short-range correlations are investigated in a fixed-target experiment at NICA and in several experiments at Jlab in the US.

Throughout his life, Anatoly continued to develop concrete manifestations of his ideas based on fundamental theory

Throughout his life, Anatoly continued to develop concrete manifestations of his ideas based on fundamental theory, becoming a teacher and advisor of many physicists at JINR, in Russia and abroad. In 1991 he initiated and became the permanent chair of the organising committee of the Dubna International Workshops on Spin Physics at High Energies. He was a long-term and authoritative member of the International Spin Physics Committee coordinating work in this area, and a regular visitor to the CERN theory unit since the 1970s.

Anatoly Vasilievich Efremov was the undisputed scientific leader, who initiated studies of quantum chromodynamics and spin physics in Dubna, one of the key BLTP JINR staff, and at the same time a modest and very friendly person, enjoying the highest authority and respect of colleagues. It is this combination of scientific and human qualities that made Anatoly Efremov’s personality unique, and this is how we will remember him.

A feel for fundamental research

Rana Adhikari

This short film focuses on mechanic turned physicist Rana Adhikari, who contributed to the 2016 discovery of gravitational waves with the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO). A laid-back, confident character, Adhikari takes us through the basics of LIGO, while touching upon the future of the field and the public’s view on fundamental research, all while directors Currimbhoy, McCarthy and Pedri facilitate the conversation, which runs at just over 12 minutes.

Following high-school, Adhikari spent time as a car mechanic. Upon reading Einstein’s Medium of Relativity during Hurricane Erin, however, he decided that he wanted to “test the speed of light.” Now, he is a professor at Caltech and a member of the LIGO collaboration, and was awarded a 2019 New Horizons in Physics Prize for his role in the gravitational-wave discovery.

In the film, recorded in 2018, Adhikari explains how fundamental research can be something everyone can get behind, in a world where it is “easy to think we’re all doomed,” and describes the power that rests on collaborations to show the importance of coming together, expressing, “It is a statement of collective willpower.” Through varying shots of him at a blackboard, in and around his experiment, and documentary-style face-to-face discussions, the audience quickly gets to know a positive thinker for whom work is clearly a passion, not a job.

The directors trust Adhikari to take centre stage and explain the world of gravitational waves through accurate metaphors that seem freestyled, yet concise. A sharp cut to a shot of turtles seems unnatural at first, before transforming into an analogy of Adhikari himself – the turtles going underwater and popping their heads up into different streams representing Adhikari’s curiosity, and how he got into the field in the first place.

The film is littered with references to music, most notably with comparisons between guitar strings and the vibrations that LIGO physicists are searching for. After playing a short, smooth riff, Adhikari states his unusual way of analysing data. “It is easier to do maths later – sometimes it’s better to just feel it.” He then plays us the “sound” file of two black holes colliding; a short chirp that is repeated as punchy statements about the long history of gravitational waves are overlayed onto the film.

We should be exploring fundamentals driven by curiosity

Towards the end, the focus takes a shift towards the public’s view on fundamental research. “Lasers weren’t created to scan items in supermarkets,” states Adhikari. “We should be exploring fundamentals driven by curiosity.” The film closes on Adhikari discussing the future of LIGO, tapping a glass to cause a lengthy ring representing the search for longer-wavelength gravitational waves.

Through Adhikari’s story, LIGO: The way the universe Is, I think will inspire anyone who feels alienated or intimidated by fundamental research.

bright-rec iop pub iop-science physcis connect