Comsol -leaderboard other pages

Topics

Long-lived particles gather interest

From 25 to 28 May, the long-lived particle (LLP) community marked five years of stretching the limits of searches for new physics with its ninth and best-attended workshop yet, with more than 300 registered participants.

LLP9 played host to six new results, three each from ATLAS and CMS. These included a remarkable new ATLAS paper searching for stopped particles – beyond-the-Standard Model (BSM) LLPs that can be produced in a proton–proton collision and then get stuck in the detector before decaying minutes, days or weeks later. Good hypothetical examples are the so-called gluino R-hadrons that occur in supersymmetric models. Also featured was a new CMS search for displaced di-muon resonances using “data scouting” – a unique method of increasing the number of potential signal events kept at the trigger level by reducing the event information that is retained. Both experiments presented new results searching for the Higgs boson decaying to LLPs (see “LLP candidate” figure).

Long-lived particles can also be produced in a collision inside ATLAS, CMS or LHCb and live long enough to drift entirely outside of the detector volume. To ensure that this discovery avenue is also covered for the future of the LHC’s operation, there is a rich set of dedicated LLP detectors either approved or proposed, and LLP9 featured updates from MoEDAL, FASER, MATHUSLA, CODEX-b, MilliQan, FACET and SND@LHC, as well as a presentation about the proposed forward physics facility for the High-Luminosity LHC (HL-LHC).

Reinterpreting machine learning

The liveliest parts of any LLP community workshop are the brainstorming and hands-on working-group sessions. LLP9 included multiple vibrant discussions and working sessions, including on heavy neutral leptons and the ability of physicists who are not members of experimental collaborations to be able to re-interpret LLP searches – a key issue for the LLP community. At LLP9, participants examined the challenges inherent in re-interpreting LLP results that use machine learning techniques, by now a common feature of particle-physics analyses. For example, boosted decision trees (BDTs) and neural networks (NNs) can be quite powerful for either object identification or event-level discrimination in LLP searches, but it’s not entirely clear how best to give theorists access to the full original BDT or NN used internally by the experiments.

LLP searches at the LHC often must also grapple with background sources that are negligible for the majority of searches for prompt objects. These backgrounds – such as cosmic muons, beam-induced backgrounds, beam-halo effects and cavern backgrounds – are reasonably well-understood for Run 2 and Run 3, but little study has been performed for the upcoming HL-LHC, and LLP9 featured a brainstorming session about what such non-standard backgrounds might look like in the future.

Also looking to the future, two very forward-thinking working-group sessions were held on LLPs at a potential future muon collider and at the proposed Future Circular Collider (FCC). Hadron collisions at ~100 TeV in FCC-hh would open up completely unprecedented discovery potential, including for LLPs, but it’s unclear how to optimise detector designs for both LLPs and the full slate of prompt searches.

Simulating dark showers is a longstanding challenge

Finally, LLP9 hosted an in-depth working-group session dedicated to the simulation of “dark showers”, in collaboration with the organisers of the dark-showers study group connected to the Snowmass process, which is currently shaping the future of US particle physics. Dark showers are a generic and poorly understood feature of a potential BSM dark sector with similarities to QCD, which could have its own “dark hadronisation” rules. Simulating dark showers is a longstanding challenge. More than 50 participants joined for a hands-on demonstration of simulation tools and a discussion of the dark-showers Pythia module, highlighting the growing interest in this subject in the LLP community.

LLP9 was raucous and stimulating, and identified multiple new avenues of research. LLPX, the tenth workshop in the series, will be held in November this year.

Sustainable high-energy physics

SustHEP 2021

COVID-19 put the community on a steep learning curve regarding new forms of online communication and collaboration. Before the pandemic, a typical high-energy physics (HEP) researcher was expected to cross the world several times a year for conferences, collaboration meetings and detector shifts, at the cost of thousands of dollars and a sizeable carbon footprint. The online workshop Sustainable HEP — a new initiative this year — attracted more than 300 participants from 45 countries from 28 to 30 June to discuss how the lessons learned in the past two years might help HEP transition to a more sustainable future.

The first day of the workshop focused on how new forms of online interaction could change our professional travel culture. Shaun Hotchkiss (University of Auckland) stressed in a session dedicated to best-practice examples that the purpose of online meetings should not simply be to emulate traditional 20th-century in-person conferences and collaboration meetings. Instead, the community needs to rethink what virtual scientific exchange could look like in the 21st century. This might, for instance, include replacing traditional live presentations by pre-recorded talks that are pre-watched by the audience at their own convenience, leaving more precious conference time for in-depth discussions and interactions among the participants.

Social justice

The second day highlighted social-justice issues, and the potential for greater inclusivity using online formats. Alice Gathoni (British Institute in Eastern Africa) powerfully described the true meaning of online meetings to her: everyone wants to belong. It was only during the first online meetings during the pandemic that she truly felt a real sense of belonging to the global scientific community.

The third day was dedicated to existing sustainability initiatives and new technologies. Mike Seidel (PSI) presented studies on energy-recovery linacs and discussed energy-management concepts for future colliders, including daily “standby modes”. Other options include beam dynamics explicitly designed to maximise the ratio of luminosity to power, more efficient radio-frequency cavities, the use of permanent magnets, and high-temperature superconductor cables and cavities. He concluded his talk by asking thought-provoking questions such as whether the HEP community should engage with its international networks to help establish sustainable energy-supply solutions.

The workshop ended by drafting a closing statement that calls upon the HEP community to align its activities with the Paris Climate Agreement and the goal of limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees. This statement can be signed by members of the HEP community until 20 August.

AI and GPUs take centre stage at vCHEP

vCHEP2021 group photo

The 25th International Conference on Computing in High-Energy and Nuclear Physics (CHEP) gathered more than 1000 participants online from 17 to 21 May. Dubbed “vCHEP”, the event took place virtually after this year’s in-person event in Norfolk, Virginia, had to be cancelled due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants tuned in across 20 time zones, from Brisbane to Honolulu, to live talks, recorded sessions, excellent discussions on chat apps (to replace the traditional coffee-break interactions) and special sessions that linked job seekers with recruiters.

Given vCHEP’s virtual nature this year, there was a different focus on the content. Plenary speakers are usually invited, but this time the organisers invited papers of up to 10 pages to be submitted, and chose a plenary programme from the most interesting and innovative. Just 30 had to be selected from more than 200 submissions — twice as many as expected — but the outcome was a diverse programme tackling the huge issues of data rate and event complexity in future experiments in nuclear and high-energy physics (HEP).

Artificial intelligence

So what were the hot topics at vCHEP? One outstanding one was artificial intelligence and machine learning. There were more papers submitted on this theme than any other, showing that the field is continuing to innovate in this domain. 

Interest in using graph neural networks for the problem of charged-particle tracking was very high, with three plenary talks. Using a graph to represent the hits in a tracker as nodes and possible connections between hits as edges is a very natural way to represent the data that we get from experiments. The network can be effectively trained to pick out the edges representing the true tracks and reject those that are just spurious connections. The time needed to get to a good solution has improved dramatically in just a few years, and the scaling of the solution to dense environments, such as at the High-Luminosity LHC (HL-LHC), is very promising for this relatively new technique. 

ATLAS showed off their new fast-simulation framework

On the simulation side, work was presented showcasing new neural-network architectures that use a “bounded information-bottleneck autoencoder” to improve training stability, providing a solution that replicates important features such as how real minimum-ionising particles interact with calorimeters. ATLAS also showed off their new fast-simulation framework, which combines traditional parametric simulation with generative adversarial networks, to provide better agreement with Geant4 than ever before.

New architectures

Machine learning is very well suited to new computing architectures, such as graphics processing units (GPUs), but many other experimental-physics codes are also being rewritten to take advantage of these new architectures. IceCube are simulating photon transport in the Antarctic ice on GPUs, and presented detailed work on their performance analysis that led to recent significant speed-ups. Meanwhile, LHCb will introduce GPUs to their trigger farm for Run 3, and showed how much this will improve the energy consumption per event of the high-level trigger. This will help to meet the physical constraints of power and cooling close to the detector, and is a first step towards bringing HEP’s overall computing energy consumption to the table as an important parameter. 

LHCb will introduce GPUs to their trigger farm for Run 3

Encouraging work on porting event generation to GPUs was also presented — particularly appropriately, given the spiralling costs of higher order generators for HL-LHC physics. Looking at the long-term future of these new code bases, there were investigations of porting calorimeter simulation and liquid-argon time-projection chamber software to different toolkits for heterogeneous programming, a topic that will become even more important as computing centres diversify their offerings.

Keeping up with benchmarking and valuing these heterogeneous resources is an important topic for the Worldwide LHC Computing Grid, and a report from the HEPiX Benchmarking group pointed to the future for evaluating modern CPUs and GPUs for a variety of real-world HEP applications. Staying on the facilities topic, R&D was presented on how to optimise delivering reliable and affordable storage for HEP, based on CephFS and the CERN-developed EOS storage system. This will be critical to providing the massive storage needed in the future. The network between facilities will likely become dynamically configurable in the future, and how best to take advantage of machine learning for traffic prediction is being investigated.

Quantum computing

vCHEP was also the first edition of CHEP with a dedicated parallel session on quantum computing. Meshing very well with CERN’s Quantum Initiative, this showed how seriously investigations of how to use this technology in the future are being taken. Interesting results on using quantum support-vector machines to train networks for signal/background classification for B-meson decays were highlighted.

On a meta note, presentations also explored how to adapt outreach events to a virtual setup, to keep up public engagement during lockdown, and how best to use online software training to equip the future generation of physicists with the advanced software skills they will need.

Was vCHEP a success? So far, the feedback is overwhelmingly positive. It was a showcase for the excellent work going on in the field, and 11 of the best papers will be published in a special edition of Computing and Software for Big Science — another first for CHEP in 2021.

Experiment and theory trade blows at SQM 2021

The 19th international conference on strangeness in quark matter (SQM) was hosted virtually by Brookhaven National Laboratory from 17 to 22 May, attracting more than 300 participants. The series deals with the role of strange and heavy-flavour quarks in high-energy heavy-ion collisions and astrophysical phenomena.

sQM21

New results on the production of strangeness in heavy-ion collisions were presented for a variety of collision energies and systems. In an experimental highlight, the ALICE collaboration reported that the number of strange baryons depends more on the final-state multiplicity than the initial-state energy. On the theory side, it was shown that several models can explain the suppression of strange particles at low multiplicities. ALICE also presented new measurements of the charm cross section and fragmentation functions in proton–proton (pp) collisions. When compared to e+e collisions, these results suggest that the universality of parton-to-hadron fragmentation may be broken. 

Moving on to heavy flavours, the ATLAS collaboration presented results for the suppression of heavy-flavour production compared to pp collisions and the angular anisotropy of heavy mesons in heavy-ion collisions. These measurements are crucial for constraining models of in-medium energy loss. Interestingly, while charm seems to follow the flow of the quark–gluon plasma, beauty does not seem to flow. Better statistics are needed to constrain theoretical models. On the theory side, extremely interesting new calculations using open quantum systems coupled with potential non-relativistic QCD calculations were used to compute both the suppression and anisotropic flow of bottomonium states.

Hints of extrema

Another important goal of the field is to determine experimentally whether a critical point exists in the phase diagram of strongly interacting matter, and, if so, where it is located. The STAR experiment at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) presented results on higher order cumulants of net-proton fluctuations over a range of collision energies. Extrema as a function of beam energy are expected to indicate critical behaviour. New data from the Beam Energy Scan II programme at RHIC is expected to provide much-needed statistics to confirm hints of extrema in the data. On the theory side, new lattice QCD calculations of second-order net-baryon cumulants were presented, as well as new expansion schemes to extend the lattice-QCD equation of state to larger net baryon chemical potentials that are not computable directly, because of the fermion-sign problem. Another study included the lattice-QCD equation of state and susceptibilities in a hydrodynamic calculation to allow for a more direct comparison to experimental measurements of net-proton fluctuations. Significant differences between net-proton and net-baryon fluctuations were quantified. 

The study of the quark–gluon plasma’s vorticity via the measurement of the polarisation of hyperons was also a major topic. Theoretical calculations obtain the opposite sign to the data for the angular differential measurement. Attempts to solve this discrepancy presented at SQM 2021 featured shear-dependent terms and a stronger “memory” of the strange-quark spin.

Various new applications of machine learning and artificial intelligence were also discussed, for example, for determining the order of the phase transition and constraining the neutron-star equation of state. 

Overall, there were 41 plenary and 96 parallel talks at SQM 2021, poignantly including presentations in memory of Jean Cleymans, Jean Letessier, Dick Majka and Jack Sandweiss, who all made exceptional impacts on the field.

The next SQM conference will be held from 13 to 18 June 2022 in Busan, South Korea.

IPAC thrives online

The annual International Particle Accelerator Conference (IPAC) promotes collaboration among scientists, engineers, technicians, students and industrial partners across the globe. Originally to be hosted this year by the Laboratório Nacional de Luz Síncrotron (LNLS) in Campinas, Brazil, the conference was moved online when it became clear that the global pandemic would prohibit travel. IPAC21 was nevertheless highly successful, attracting more than 1750 participants online from 24 to 28 May. Despite the technical and logistical challenges, the virtual platform provided many advantages, including low or zero registration fees and a larger, younger and more diverse demographic than typical in-person events, which tend to attract about 1000 delegates.

IPAC21 poster

In order to allow worldwide virtual participation, live plenary presentations were limited to two hours daily. Highlights included Harry Westfahl, Jr. (LNLS) on the scientific capabilities of fourth-generation storage-ring light sources; Thomas Glasmacher (FRIB) on the newly commissioned Facility for Rare Isotope Beams at Michigan State University; Norbert Holtkamp (SLAC) on the future of high-power free-electron lasers; Houjun Qian (DESY) on radio-frequency photocathode guns; and Young-Kee Kim (University of Chicago) on future directions in US particle physics. The closing plenary talk was a sobering presentation on climate change and the Brazilian Amazonia region by Paulo Artaxo (University of São Paulo).

The remainder of the talks were pre-recorded with live Q&A sessions, and 400 teleconferencing rooms per day were set up to allow virtual poster sessions. Highlights in topical sessions included “Women in Science: The Inconvenient Truth” by Márcia Barbosa (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul) and an industrial forum hosted by Raffaella Geometrante (KYMA) on the intersection between government accelerator projects and industry.

IPAC22 is currently planned as an in-person conference in Bangkok, Thailand, from 17 to 22 June next year.

LHCP sees a host of new results

More than 1000 physicists took part in the ninth Large Hadron Collider Physics (LHCP) conference from 7 to 12 June. The in-person conference was to have been held in Paris: for the second year in a row, however, the organisers efficiently moved the meeting online, without a registration fee, thanks to the support of CERN and IUPAP. While the conference experience cannot be the same over a video link, the increased accessibility for people from all parts of the international community was evident, with LHCP21 participants hailing from institutes across 54 countries.

LHCP21 poster

The LHCP format traditionally has plenary sessions in the mornings and late afternoons, with parallel sessions in the middle of the day. This “shape” was kept for the online meeting, with a shorter day to improve the practicality of joining from distant time zones. This resulted in a dense format with seven-fold parallel sessions, allowing all parts of the LHC programme, both experimental and theoretical, to be explored in detail. The overall vitality of the programme is illustrated by the raw statistics: a grand total of 238 talks and 122 posters were presented.

Last year saw a strong focus on the couplings to the second generation

Nine years on from the discovery of the 125 GeV Higgs boson, measurements have progressed to a new level of precision with the full Run-2 data. Both ATLAS and CMS presented new results on Higgs production, helping constrain the dynamics of the production mechanisms via differential and “simplified template” cross-section measurements. While the couplings of the Higgs to third-generation fermions are now established, last year saw a strong focus on the couplings to the second generation. After first evidence for Higgs decays to muons was reported from CMS and ATLAS results earlier in the year, ATLAS presented a new search with the full Run-2 data for Higgs decays to charm quarks using powerful new charm-tagging techniques. Both CMS and ATLAS showed updated searches for Higgs-pair production, with ATLAS being able to exclude a production rate more than 4.1 times the Standard Model (SM) prediction at 95% confidence. This is a process that should be observable with High-Luminosity LHC statistics, if it is as predicted in the SM. A host of searches were also reported, some using the Higgs as a tool to probe for new physics.

Puzzling hints

The most puzzling hints from the LHC Run 1 seem to strengthen in Run 2. LHCb presented analyses relating to the “flavour anomalies” found most notably in b→sµ+µ decays, updated to the full data statistics, in multiple channels. While no result yet passes a 5σ difference from SM expectations, the significances continue to creep upwards. Searches by ATLAS and CMS for potential new particles or effects at high masses that could indicate an associated new-physics mechanism continue to draw a blank, however. This remains a dilemma to be studied with more precision and data in Run 3. Other results in the flavour sector from LHCb included a new measurement of the lifetime of the Ωc, four times longer than previous measurements (CERN Courier July/August 2021 p17) and the first observation of a mass difference between the mixed D0D0 meson mass eigenstates (CERN Courier July/August 2021 p8).

A wealth of results was presented from heavy-ion collisions. Measurements with heavy quarks were prominent here as well. ALICE reported various studies of the differences in heavy-flavour hadron production in proton–proton and heavy-ion collisions, for example using D mesons. CMS reported the first observation of Bc meson production in heavy-ion collisions, and also first evidence for top-quark pair production in lead–lead collisions. ATLAS used heavy-flavour decays to muons to compare suppression of b- and c-hadron production in lead–lead and proton–proton collisions. Beyond the ions, ALICE also showed intriguing new results demonstrating that the relative rates of different types of c-hadron production differ in proton–proton collisions compared to earlier experiments using e+e and ep collisions at LEP and HERA.

Looking forward, the experiments reported on their preparations for the coming LHC Run 3, including substantial upgrades. While some work has been slowed by the pandemic, recommissioning of the detectors has begun in preparation for physics data taking in spring 2022, with the brighter beams expected from the upgraded CERN accelerator chain. One constant to rely on, however, is that LHCP will continue to showcase the fantastic panoply of physics at the LHC.

New charmed-baryon lifetime hierarchy cast in stone

Figure 1

Which charmed baryon decays first? The LHCb collaboration recently challenged the received wisdom of fixed-target experiments by almost quadrupling the measured lifetime of the doubly strange Ωc0. Now, a follow-up measurement by the collaboration confirms the revised hierarchy, offering valuable input to theoretical models of the decays.

The situation changed dramatically in 2018

Ground-state baryons containing a charm quark (c), such as Λc+ (udc), Ξc+ (usc), Ξc0 (dsc) and Ωc0 (ssc), decay via the weak interaction. The ordering of their lifetimes has long been thought to be τ(Ξc+) > τ(Λc+) > τ(Ξc0) > τ(Ωc0), based on measurements from fixed-target experiments nearly 20 years ago. However, the situation changed dramatically in 2018 when LHCb joined the game using a sample of Ωc0 baryons obtained from bottom- baryon semileptonic decays. That LHCb study measured the Ωc0 lifetime to be nearly four times larger than previously measured, transforming the hierarchy into τ(Ξc+) > τ(Ωc0) > τ(Λc+) > τ(Ξc0). One year later, LHCb significantly improved the precisions of the lifetimes of the other three charmed baryons using the same method, also finding the lifetime of the Ξc0 baryon to be larger than the world-average value by about 3σ (figure 1).

Theoretically challenging

The corresponding theoretical calculations are challenging. In the charm sector, an effective theory of heavy-quark expansion is taken to calculate lifetimes of charmed baryons through an expansion in powers of 1/mc, where mc is the constituent charm–quark mass. Calculations up to order 1/mc3 imply a lifetime hierarchy consistent with the original fixed-target measurements, though only qualitatively. Attempts at higher-order calculations up to order 1/mc4, however, cannot accommodate the old hierarchy, but can explain the new one if a suppression factor to the constructive Pauli-interference and semileptonic terms is written in. The origin of the suppression factor is still unknown, but probably due to even higher order effects. An independent measurement was therefore needed to confirm the experimental situation.

The charmed-baryon lifetime puzzle has now been resolved by a new measurement from LHCb using a much larger sample of Ωc0 and Ξc0 baryons produced directly in proton–proton collisions. Both particles are detected in the final state pKKπ+. The measurement is made relative to the lifetime distribution of the charmed meson D0 via D0 K+Kπ+π decays, in order to control systematic uncertainties. Taking advantage of the performance and detailed understanding of the LHCb detector, the lifetimes of the Ωc0 and Ξc0 baryons are found to be τ(Ωc0) = 276.5 ± 13.4 (stat) ± 4.5 (syst) fs and τ(Ξc0) = 148.0 ± 2.3 (stat) ± 2.2 (syst) fs, respectively, where the precision of the Ωc0 lifetime is improved by a factor of two compared to the semileptonic measurement. The new results are consistent with the previous LHCb measurements, and hence establish the new lifetime hierarchy. Combining this measurement with the previous LHCb results gives τ(Ωc0) = 274.5 ± 12.4 fs and τ(Ξc0) = 152.0 ± 2.0 fs, the most precise charm-baryon lifetimes to date. The newly confirmed lifetime hierarchy will help improve our knowledge of QCD dynamics in charm hadrons, and provides a crucial input to calibrate theoretical calculations.

Four top quarks seen at once

Four-top candidate

The production of four top quarks is an extremely rare event at the LHC, with an expected cross section five orders of magnitude below the production of a top-quark pair. With the heaviest elementary particle in the Standard Model produced four times in the final state, it is also one of the most spectacular processes accessible at the LHC. By combining two analyses, the ATLAS collaboration has uncovered the first strong evidence to support the existence of this unique event topology with sensitivity to theo­ries beyond the Standard Model (BSM).

This is the only process that could probe potentially anomalous effective four-heavy-fermion operators

Figure 1

As a result of its large mass, the top quark plays a special role in numerous BSM theories, and many of these theories predict an increase in the four-top-quark production cross section. In particular, four-top-quark production is the only process that could probe potentially anomalous effective four-heavy-fermion operators. The cross section is also sensitive to the value of the top-quark Yukawa coupling, as a result of contributions mediated by Higgs bosons. However, until now, four-top-quark production has not been observed, in part because of its tiny production rate, and in part because the experimental signature of this process is very complex, requiring up to 12 particles to be reconstructed from the top-quark decays. The search is also affected by background sources in kinematic regions that are at the limit of the domain of validity of the simulations. 

Despite these challenges, the ATLAS collaboration has recently released two studies of four-top-quark production using its full Run-2 data sample. The first study searches for events with two leptons (electrons or muons) with the same electric charge or with three leptons. This selection corresponds to only 13% of all possible four-top-quark final states, but is contaminated by only a small background, mainly from the production of a top-quark pair with a W, Z or Higgs boson and additional jets, or from events with one lepton with misidentified electric charge or a “fake” lepton that doesn’t correspond to a W or Z boson decay. Background processes were primarily simulated using the best available theoretical predictions; the rates of the most difficult ones were measured using control samples with similar properties to the signal events. The second study searches for events with one lepton or two oppositely-charged leptons. This selection retains 57% of the possible four-top-quark final states, but suffers from a large background from top-quark pairs produced in association with many jets, some of which are consistent with originating from b-quarks (b-jets). This background is difficult to model and was determined using data control samples. To better isolate the signal from the background, multivariate discriminants were trained in both analyses using distinct features of the signal, such as the number of b-jets and the kinematic properties of the reconstructed particles (see figure 1).

Figure 2

Results from the two studies were combined, leading to a four-top-quark cross-section measurement at 13 TeV of 25+7–6 fb, which is consistent with the Standard Model prediction of 12.0 ± 2.4 fb within 2.0σ (see figure 2). The statistical significance of the signal corresponds to 4.7σ, providing strong evidence for this process, close to the observation threshold of 5σ. LHC Run-3 data, possibly at a higher centre-of-mass energy, will allow ATLAS to verify whether the larger measured cross section relative to the prediction is confirmed or not. 

Resistive Gaseous Detectors: Designs, Performance, and Perspectives

The first truly resistive gaseous detector was invented by Rinaldo Santonico and Roberto Cardarelli in 1981. A kind of parallel-plate detector with electrodes made of resistive materials such as Bakelite and thin-float glass, the design is sometimes also known as a resistive-plate chamber (RPC). Resistive gaseous detectors use electronegative gases and electric fields that typically exceed 10 kV/cm. When a charged particle is incident in the gas gap, the working operational gas is ionised, and primary electrons cause an avalanche as a result of the high electric field. The induced charge is then obtained on the readout pad as a signal. RPCs have several unique and important practical features, combining good spatial resolution with a time resolution comparable to that of scintillators. They are therefore well suited for fast spacetime particle tracking, as a cost-effective way to instrument large volumes of a detector, for example in muon systems at collider experiments.

Resistive gaseous detectors use electronegative gases and electric fields which typically exceed 10 kV/cm

Resistive Gaseous Detectors: Designs, Performance, and Perspectives, a new book by Marcello Abbrescia, Vladimir Peskov and Paulo Fonte, covers the basic principles of their operation, historical development, the latest achievements and their growing applications in various fields from hadron colliders to astrophysics. This book is not only a summary of numerous scientific publications on many different examples of RPCs, but also a detailed description of their design, operation and performance.

Resistive Gaseous Detectors

The book has nine chapters. The operational principle of gaseous detectors and some of their limitations, most notably the efficiency drop in a high-particle-rate environment, are described. This is followed by a history of parallel-plate detectors, the first classical Bakelite RPC, double-gap RPCs and glass-electrode multi-gap timing RPCs. A modern design of double-gap RPCs and examples for the muon systems like those at ATLAS and CMS at the LHC, the STAR detector at the Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collider at Brookhaven and the multi-gap timing RPC for the time-of-flight system of the HADES experiment at GSI are detailed. Advanced designs with new materials for electrodes for high-rate detectors are then introduced, and ageing and longevity are elaborated upon. A new generation of gaseous detectors with resistive electrodes that can be made with microelectronic technology is then introduced: these large-area electrodes can easily be manufactured while still achieving high spatial resolutions up to 12 microns.

Homeland security

The final chapter covers applications outside particle physics such as those in medicine exploiting positron-emission tomography. For homeland security, RPCs can be used in muon-scattering tomography with cosmic-ray muons to scan spent nuclear fuel containers without opening them, or to quickly scan incoming cargo trucks without disrupting the traffic of logistics. A key subject not covered in detail, however, is the need to search for environmentally friendly alternatives to gases with high global-warming potential, which are often needed in resistive gaseous detectors at present to achieve stable and sustained operation (CERN Courier July/August 2021 p20).

Abbrescia, Peskov and Fonte’s book will be useful to graduates specialising in high-energy physics, astronomy, astrophysics, medical physics and radiation measurements in general for undergraduate students and teachers.

What if scientists ruled the world?

A chemistry professor invents a novel way to produce chemical compounds, albeit with a small chance of toxicity. A paper is published. A quick chat with a science communicator leads to a hasty press release. But when the media picks up on it, the story is twisted.

“What if scientists ruled the world?” — a somewhat sensational but thought-provoking title for a play — is an interactive theatre production by the Australian Academy of Science in partnership with Falling Walls Engage. Staged on 8 May at the Shine Dome in Canberra, Australia, a hybrid performance explored the ramifications of an ill-considered press release, and provided a welcome opportunity for scientists to reflect on how best to communicate their research. The dynamic exchange of ideas between science experts and laypeople in the audience highlighted the power of words, and how they are used to inform, persuade, deceive or confuse. 

What if scientists ruled the world?

After setting the scene, director Ali Clinch invited people participating remotely on Zoom and via a YouTube livestream to guide the actors’ actions, helping to advance and reframe the storyline with their ideas, questions and comments. Looking at the same story from different points of view invited the audience to think about the different stakeholders and their responsibility in communicating science. In the first part of the performance, for example, the science communicator talks excitedly about her job with students, but later has to face a crisis that the busy professor is unable or unwilling to deal with. At a critical point in the story, when a town-hall meeting is held to debate the future of a company that employs most of the people in the town, but which probably produced the same toxic chemical, everybody felt part of the performance. The audience could even take the place of an actor, or act in a new role.

The play highlighted the pleasures and tribulations of work at the interface between research and public engagement

The play highlighted the pleasures and tribulations of work at the interface between research and public engagement during euphoric discoveries and crisis moments alike, and has parallels both with the confusion encountered during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic and misguided early fears that the LHC could generate a black hole. In an age of fake news, sensationalism and misinformation, the performance adeptly highlighted the complexities and vested interests inherent in science communication today.

bright-rec iop pub iop-science physcis connect