Comsol -leaderboard other pages

Topics

EU decides on the future of research

On 20 April Europe’s seven major intergovernmental research organizations, working together in the EIROforum partnership, presented their comprehensive paper on science policy, “Towards a Europe of Knowledge and Innovation”.

Five years ago, at the meeting of the European Council in Lisbon, the creation of a European Research Area (ERA) was proposed as a means to achieve the ambitious targets necessary to develop a leading, knowledge-based economy in Europe.

Two years later the EIROforum partnership was created between seven of Europe’s major intergovernmental research organizations, the oldest of which is CERN. These organizations operate some of the largest research infrastructures in the world, with a combined budget comparable to that of the current Sixth Framework Programme (FP6) of the European Union (EU).

The EIROforum paper describes the partnership’s collective vision for the future of European scientific research necessary to support the Lisbon Process by working for the implementation of the ERA. The partners support the creation of a climate in Europe in which competitive research is undertaken in an efficient, cost-effective and successful manner. The aim is to be able to recruit and retain world-leading scientists in Europe, and at the same time help European industry by promoting joint front-line research that can generate important spin-offs. The paper presents many concrete ways in which the EIROforum organizations can participate effectively in the consolidation of the ERA.

A couple of weeks earlier, the European Commission adopted the proposal for the seventh Framework Programme (FP7). FPs are the EU’s main instrument for funding research in Europe. They cover a period of five years with the last year of one FP and the first year of the following FP overlapping. FP6 has been operational since 2003 with a total budget of €17.5 billion. FP7 will cover the period 2007-2013 with a budget of €72.7 billion and a time span of seven instead of five years. The ambitious proposal calls for improved efficiencies and aims to build on the achievements of previous programmes.

A new element is the establishment of a “European Research Council”, an independent, science-driven body that will fund European frontier research projects and ensure that European research is competitive at a global level. It will implement the peer review and selection process and will ensure the financial and scientific management of the grants. The EIROforum paper also supports this proposal.

In a third European initiative, on 8 April the European Strategy Forum on Research Infrastructures (ESFRI) presented the EU Commission with its paper “Towards New Research Infrastructures for Europe – the ESFRI ‘List of Opportunities'”. The forum was launched in April 2002 to support a coherent approach to policy-making on research infrastructures in Europe. Its horizon is the next 10-20 years.

The projects chosen had to be of pan-European interest, in an advanced state of maturity so that they can receive funds in FP7 and of international relevance. The forum wanted a “balanced” list that best corresponds to major needs of Europe’s scientific community. Out of a total of 23 opportunities, there were four projects on physics and astronomy, four on multidisciplinary facilities and one in computing.

Of the physics and astronomy projects, two are in nuclear physics, one in astronomy and one in neutrino physics (KM3NeT, a future deep underwater experiment in the Mediterranean). Multidisciplinary facilities include a European X-ray free-electron laser (XFEL) facility. The report also mentions, without specific details, five global projects with strong European participation, including the International Space Station (ISS) and the International Linear Collider (ILC).

• The seven EIRO forum members are the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), the European Fusion Development Agreement (EFDA), the European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), the European Space Agency (ESA), the European Southern Observatory (ESO), the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF) and the Institut Laue-Langevin (ILL).

Join the open-access revolution

There is a quiet revolution under way in academic publishing that will change how we publish and access scientific knowledge. “Open access”, made possible by new electronic tools, will give enormous benefits to all readers by providing free access to research results.

CCEvie1_06-05

The scientific articles published in journals under the traditional publishing paradigm are paid for through subscriptions by libraries and individuals, creating barriers for those unable to pay. The ever-increasing cost of the traditional publishing methods means that many libraries in Europe and the US – even the CERN Library, which is supposed to serve international researchers at a centre of excellence – are unable to offer complete coverage of their core subjects.

In 2003 the Berlin Declaration on open access to knowledge in the sciences and the humanities was launched at a meeting organized by the Max Planck Society. Six months later, the first practical actions towards implementing the recommendations of the declaration on an international level were formulated at a meeting held at CERN in May 2004. So far the declaration has been signed by 61 organizations throughout the world, which are now taking concrete measures for its implementation.

An obvious prerequisite for open access is that institutions implement a policy requiring their researchers to deposit a copy of all their published works in an open-access repository. The Council for the Central Laboratory of the Research Councils’ library committee in the UK sponsored such a project, ePubs, with the aim of achieving an archive of the scientific output of CCLRC in the form of journal articles, conference papers, technical reports, e-prints, theses and books, containing the full text where possible.

The feasibility study, carried out from January to March 2003, demonstrated the business need for this service within the organization. The data, going back to the mid-1960s, can be retrieved using the search interface or the many browse indices, which include year, author and journal title. In addition the ePubs system is today indexed by Google and Google Scholar. The scientific content of the system has further led Thomson ISI (the provider of information resources including Web of Knowledge and Science Citation Index) to classify ePubs as a high-quality resource.

The next step is to encourage the researchers – while of course fully respecting their academic freedom – to publish their research articles in open-access journals where a suitable journal exists.
In recent years new journals applying alternative publishing models have appeared in the arena. The problem so far is that none of these journals have a long-term business model. They are sponsored either by a research organization or by other titles in the publisher’s portfolio, or enjoy sponsorship that will not last forever.

Scientific publishing has a price and will continue to have a price, currently mainly covered by academic libraries through subscriptions. Moving to an open-access publishing model should dramatically reduce the global cost for the whole of the academic community. The publication costs should be considered a part of the research cost and the research administrators should budget for these when the research budgets are allocated. However, a change must not take place without safeguarding the peer-review system, which is the guarantor of scientific quality and integrity.

Outside biology and medicine, few journals that support open access are given the same academic credits as the traditional journals. This situation is further reinforced if there is a direct coupling between research funding and the “impact factors” of journals where results are published. However, by taking the risk and publishing important work in new journals that implement the open-access paradigm, the impact factor will automatically be enhanced.

The example of the Journal of High Energy Physics (JHEP) is striking. This relatively new journal was launched by the International School for Advanced Studies (SISSA) in Trieste in 1997. Today some studies give it an impact factor close to that of Physical Review Letters in publishing papers on high-energy physics. JHEP was launched ahead of its time and was forced, because of the lack of financial support, to become a subscription journal. However, with the support of the main physics laboratories, it would be possible in the present climate for this successful journal to enter the open-access arena once again.

If a change is wanted, it is up to us. Particle physics cannot change the world alone, but a clear position among our authors and our members of editorial boards will have a strong synergy with our colleagues pulling in the same direction in other fields.

Large Hadron Collider Phenomenology

by M Krämer and F J P Soler (eds), Institute of Physics Publishing. Hardback ISBN 0750309865, £75 ($125).

The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is often described as the machine needed by the worldwide community of high-energy particle physics experimentalists and theorists to search for and, it is hoped, discover physics signals beyond those expected from the Standard Model of particle interactions. The general-purpose experiments now completing construction (ATLAS and CMS) are often described as huge facilities optimized for the search for the elusive Higgs boson, the one key element missing in the Standard Model. About three years from now, the whole community in our field will focus on new and, we hope, unexpected physics results. These will cover a wide range of topics, extending over all possible theoretical conjectures published to date, that are relevant to experiments at the scale of tera-electron-volts.

CCEboo1_05-05

Given the dearth of guidance from experiments (aside from the beautiful but maddening agreement of even the most precise measurements with the predictions of the Standard Model), the driving goal of all theoretical developments beyond this very same Standard Model is that of solving the many fundamental issues in particle physics, which today are also relevant to cosmology, a science that has become much more mature experimentally over the past 10 years or so.

This book presents a series of lectures attempting to cover LHC phenomenology in the broadest possible sense. They range on one side from the intricacies of scalar fields, string theory and extra dimensions, to the basics of detector physics, which for more than 10 years has guided R&D in our field. This has led to the optimized design of the huge and complex detectors needed to extract minute signals from the huge backgrounds, involving today’s exciting physics (electroweak gauge-boson production, quantum chromodynamic multi-jet events, and heavy flavour production). But the lectures also range from accelerator science to modern e-science (the birth of the computing Grid) and from the less well known intricacies of heavy-ion physics to those of forward physics, where diffractive and quasi-elastic phenomena dominate.

These lectures were meant for today’s young physicists, many of whom will surely be the driving force behind the physics analyses and publications of the LHC experiments over the coming years. They were delivered on the occasion of the 57th Scottish Universities Summer School in Physics in summer 2003, by a well balanced mix of experienced theorists (D Ross, K Ellis and J Ellis) and seasoned experimentalists (V Gibson, H Hoffmann, B Müller, M A Parker, A de Roeck, R Schmidt and T S Virdee).

The emphasis in most of the lectures was on giving a snapshot of the current status of understanding in theory, phenomenology and accelerator and detector performance. The inevitable fate of such snapshots is to become fairly quickly obsolete, given the huge ongoing development of both the hardware and the software (should one add the middleware?) needed to operate the experiments, to simulate their performance accurately, to analyse their data quickly but unerringly, and to give a fair chance to all participants on all continents to join in the fun in the summer of 2007. Another drawback of such attempts is that, unavoidably, certain topics are treated superficially. However, I believe upon reading large sections of the book that this is largely outweighed by the benefit, for the young and less young reader, of finding in one volume a really complete coverage of all aspects relevant to LHC physics with a sufficiently rich bibliography to pursue in-depth reading.

For example, the reader interested in the phenomenology of quantum chromodynamic (QCD) beyond its direct application to LHC physics is referred to the book QCD and Collider Physics (by K Ellis, J Stirling and B Webber, 1996), the reader interested in more in-depth studies of accelerator physics and technology is referred to the Handbook of Accelerator Physics and Engineering (by A Chao and M Tigner, 2002), and the reader interested in the design and optimization of the general-purpose ATLAS and CMS detectors is referred to “Experimental challenges in high luminosity collider physics” (by N Ellis and T S Virdee, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 44 609, 1994) and to all the Technical Design Reports published from these experiments between 1996 and 2005.

In summary, this book is an excellent introduction to LHC physics for any person entering the field now, at a moment when a huge effort from the whole community is still ongoing to meet the difficult challenge of assembling the various jigsaws needed to observe the first proton-proton collisions at the tera-electron-volt scale in summer 2007.

The reader has to be aware though that, apart from the foundations of the Standard Model, of supersymmetric and string theories, and of particle interactions in matter, many of the details provided in the lectures to illustrate the wonderful and exciting potential of the LHC and its associated detectors are to be considered as examples only. These will most likely bear little resemblance to the results published in the final publications a few (or many) years from now. I believe that most experimentalists, who have devoted a large fraction of their professional lives to make the LHC dream come true, hope that reality at the tera-electron-volt scale is something quite different from what has been envisaged to date by our theory colleagues. It is indeed the fulfilment of such a hope that can give a new and much needed impetus to our field, thereby surely opening up rich and thrilling prospects for the generations of theorists and experimentalists to come.

US budget changes priorities for HEP

On 8 February the White House released its budget proposal for the financial year 2006. The science and technology budget of the US Department of Energy has been reduced overall by about 3.8% compared with 2005, whereas the budget for high-energy physics (HEP) is reduced by about 3%. The proposal is pending approval by Congress.

The HEP programme for 2006 has been structured in such a way “not only to maximize the scientific returns on our investment in these facilities, but also to invest in R&D now for the most promising new facilities that will come online in the next decade”. This has necessitated some prioritization.

The planned operations, upgrade and infrastructure for the Tevatron at Fermilab are cited as the highest priority, with a high priority also given to operations, upgrades and infrastructure of the B-factory at SLAC. However, B-factory operations will be terminated by 2008 at the latest. Support for a leadership role for US research groups in the physics programme for the Large Hadron Collider at CERN will also continue to be a high priority, and the preconceptual R&D needed to explore the nature of dark energy will continue in 2006.

A major casualty is the engineering design of the B Physics at the Tevatron (BTeV) experiment, which was scheduled to begin in 2005 as a new “major item of equipment” and will instead be terminated by the end of 2005. The reasons given are the timescale and the “lesser scientific potential” compared with other projects, although it is “still important scientifically”. Support was strong only if the project could be completed by 2010, which is “not feasible given schedule and funding constraints”.

Support for a future electron-positron linear collider, however, has increased relative to 2005 for “the continued international participation and leadership in linear collider R&D and planning by US scientists”. R&D for other new accelerator and detector technologies, particularly in the emerging area of neutrino physics, will also increase.

Cornell gets funding for brighter X-rays

The US National Science Foundation (NSF) has awarded Cornell University $18 million to begin developing a high-brilliance, high-current Energy Recovery Linac (ERL) synchrotron radiation X-ray source.

CCEnew7_04-05

All existing hard X-ray synchrotron radiation facilities are based on storage rings. Equilibrium emittance considerations limit the X-ray brilliance that is practically attainable and the ability to make short intense X-ray pulses. In an ERL the electron bunches are not stored; rather, electron bunches with very low emittance are created then accelerated by a superconducting linac.

After one circuit around a transport loop, where the X-rays are produced, the electron energy is extracted back into the radio-frequency (RF) field of the linac and used to accelerate new bunches. The energy-depleted bunches are dumped.

The beams from ERLs are predicted to be around 1000 times better in terms of brightness, coherence and pulse duration than current X-rays. They will enable investigations that are impossible to perform with existing X-ray sources.

The ERL is based on accelerator physics and superconducting microwave technology in which Cornell’s Laboratory of Elementary Particle Physics is a world leader. The NSF award to Cornell will fund the prototyping of critical components of the machine. The design team, led by Cornell’s professors Sol Gruner and Maury Tigner, has already almost completed the prototype design; scientists from Jefferson Laboratory worked with Cornell on the initial design. Prototype construction and testing should finish in 2008. Cornell then will seek funding for a full-scale ERL facility as an upgrade of the present synchrotron radiation facility, the Cornell High Energy Synchrotron Source (CHESS), which is based on the Cornell Electron Storage Ring (CESR).

Very High Energy Cosmic Gamma Radiation: A Crucial Window on the Extreme Universe

by Felix A Aharonian, World Scientific. Hardback ISBN 9810245734, £65 ($107).

Astronomy – the study of all kinds of cosmic radiation – meets particle physics at the highest gamma-ray energies. This book offers the opportunity for particle physicists to cross the bridge between the two disciplines. They will discover the nature and properties of the extreme sources in the universe able to emit photons at energies higher than 10 GeV.

CCEboo1_04-05

Very-high-energy astrophysics is entering a new era with the recent achievement by the High Energy Stereoscopic System (HESS) of the first spatially resolved high-energy gamma-ray image of an astronomical object, the supernova remnant RX J1713.7-3946. This image confirms that supernova remnants are at the origin of cosmic rays.

The lead author of the paper in Nature that described the HESS results was Felix Aharonian, the author of this book. Here he uses his expertise to provide a broad and comprehensive overview of the study of cosmic gamma rays, from energies of about 10 GeV to 10 TeV. In nearly 500 pages, he covers all aspects of the field including the theoretical ground of gamma-ray emission and absorption mechanisms, as well as the status of detection facilities. The main part of the book is, however, devoted to the phenomenology of the various sources of very-high-energy gamma rays.

With more figures than equations, the author guides us through the world of supernova remnants, pulsars, jets of quasars and microquasars, and clusters of galaxies. He even discusses the implications for cosmology, as derived from the interaction of very-high-energy gamma rays with the diffuse extragalactic background radiation. As complete as this book tends to be, however, I am a little surprised to find notable omissions, including gamma-ray bursts and the possible annihilation-radiation of weakly interacting massive particules (WIMPs), which are mentioned but not discussed.

Nevertheless, this book with its extensive list of references is a very valuable introduction to the astrophysics of high-energy gamma-ray radiation. Well structured and with its more mathematical parts left for the appendix, it is also suitable for a quick search for a specific topic. It can therefore be used as a reference book for this fascinating “last electromagnetic window” on the cosmos, a topic destined to evolve very rapidly in the coming years.

Debunked! ESP, Telekinesis and Other Pseudoscience

by Georges Charpak and Henri Broch, translated by Bart K Holland, Johns Hopkins University Press. Hardback ISBN 0801878675, $25.

CCEboo1_03-05

Georges Charpak will, as they say, need no introduction to most readers of the CERN Courier. Henri Broch, author of Au Coeur de l’Extraordinaire and a contributor to the American magazine Skeptical Inquirer, is perhaps less familiar to English-speaking readers. Now, their short book Devenez Sorciers, Devenez Savants has been translated into English by Bart Holland, with the title Debunked! ESP, Telekinesis and Other Pseudoscience.

Pseudoscientific mumbo-jumbo has been engulfing the US long enough for an extensive sceptical literature to have grown up around it. Stories about firewalking, dowsing and spoon-benders have already been dealt with by James Randi in Flim-Flam!, Martin Gardner in Science: Good, Bad and Bogus, and, less originally in my opinion, by Victor Stenger in Physics and Psychics. Charpak and Broch treat all these matters with new insight and humour, but include many new examples to show that even France, home of the Cartesian philosophy of doubt and scepticism, is now apparently ready to believe almost anything, provided it is vouched for by fashionable figures in show business or the media.

Thus, in 1982, Broch found that among undergraduate science students at Nice, 52% believed relativistic time dilatation to be pure theoretical speculation, while 68% thought that paranormal spoon-bending was scientifically proven. More recently, Elizabeth Teissier, astrological adviser to millions (including, she would have us believe, François Mitterrand), was awarded a PhD by the Sorbonne for a thinly disguised PR job vaunting her craft.

I cannot resist mentioning two of my own favourites here: Paco Rabanne, the famous fashion designer, ran away from Paris before the 1999 eclipse because he was afraid the sky might fall on his head; and the failed rock musician and racing-car writer Claude Vorilhon, a.k.a. Rael, recently got word about particle physics from the Elohim – the “extraterrestrial guardians”, he says, “of peace, non-violence and harmony at all levels of infinity”. Vorilhon e-mailed many physicists to pass on the message not to mess with the universe by constructing super-colliders; science is good and should be unlimited as long as it fuses elements, it would seem, but it should never be used when breaking or cracking infinitely small particles. As Charpak and Broch point out, the more vague, hollow and absurd the claim, the deeper the truth drawn from it – a phenomenon they term the “Well Effect”.

In his introduction, Bart Holland explains that he has tried to be true to the French original. The result will sometimes be quite confusing to English-speaking readers unfamiliar with what he calls the “glorious Gallic rhetorical style”. In addition, he has not always followed his own rule of keeping sections dealing with popular French culture and public figures intact, but has supplemented them with explanatory footnotes. In several cases, I had to turn to the original version to put arguments into context.

In their final chapter, Charpak and Broch strongly criticize the media, which they see as the natural ally of science and reason, for often (unwittingly or not) promoting the bogus claim that all ideas are of equal value, under the guise of journalistic even-handedness. The authors also differ from their English-language counterparts in that they see wider dangers in pseudoscience, such as its threat to democracy and the emergence of a multinational big business to market it. The authors’ parting advice to the reader is that critical faculties should be allied with human ones. This was more or less the position taken by Sir Walter Raleigh, who once wrote, “The skeptick doth neither affirm nor deny any position but doubteth of it, and applyeth his Reason against that which is affirmed, or denied, to justify his non-consenting.” He was beheaded shortly afterwards.

Celebratory year lifts off in Paris

More than 1000 people including eight Nobel laureates and close to 500 students from 70 countries took part in the Physics for Tomorrow conference in Paris on 13 January. The event took place at the headquarters of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). It marked the official launch of the International Year of Physics proclaimed by the UN, which aims to highlight the importance of physics and its contribution to society.

CCEnew2_03-05

The conference was organized by UNESCO, the lead UN organization for the International Year, together with other organizations from the physics community, including the CNRS and CEA in France and CERN. CERN itself was founded under the auspices of UNESCO, which is one of the observer organizations to the CERN council, so it was appropriate that Carlo Rubbia and Georges Charpak, Nobel laureates from CERN, together with the director-general, Robert Aymar, were among the invited speakers.

During the opening ceremony, Aymar emphasized the crucial roles of physics as the driving force for innovation, as the magnet for attracting and training the most talented people, and in forging partnerships of nations. Rubbia participated in the round table on “What can physics bring to the socio-economical challenges of the 21st century?” and Charpak talked about “Teaching and education in physics”.

• This inaugurated a series of events that are taking place all over the world in 2005 to celebrate physics and emphasize its role. For further information see www.wyp2005.org.

Countries sign up to XFEL agreement

A milestone has been reached on the way towards the realization of the European X-ray Free Electron Laser facility (XFEL). France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Poland, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the UK have signed a Memorandum of Understanding in which they agree to prepare the ground for a governmental accord on the construction and operation of the European XFEL research facility until mid-2006. Denmark will also sign up soon. Together with Hungary, the Netherlands, Russia, Slovakia and the European Union, which are present as observers, the signatory countries form a steering committee that coordinates the preparations for the construction of XFEL.

Following a recommendation by the German Science Council, the German federal government decided in February 2003 to go ahead with XFEL as a European joint project to be situated at the DESY laboratory in Hamburg. Commissioning this research facility, which will be unique in Europe, is to start in 2012. Its cost amounts to about €900 million, which will be borne jointly by Germany and the partner countries.

The memorandum includes working out proposals for detailed time schedules and financing schemes, the future organization structure, the exact technical design and the operation of the X-ray laser. XFEL, with its ultra-short X-ray pulses with laser-like properties, will open up completely new opportunities in a wide range of research, from geological studies to nanotechnology.

A fundamental base for the future

CCEwop1_03-05

In 1905 a young man working in the Bern patent office produced three publications on light quanta, special relativity, and the sizes and movements of molecules. The young man was, of course, Albert Einstein and 1905 was later called his annus mirabilis. The resulting theories provided insight into the cosmos, elementary particles and states of matter, and paved the way to our current understanding of matter and the universe. However, these papers also helped to lay the foundations for the economy of today, and it is for this reason that we should consider the International Year of Physics of 2005 more about looking forward than looking back.

In his work 100 years ago, Einstein was driven by his innate desire to understand the universe about him. Such curiosity-driven research creates new “breaking” knowledge – discoveries with the potential to have new, revolutionary effects in all domains of human interest. From televisions and electron microscopes to global-positioning systems (GPS) and mobile phones, there are numerous examples of breakthroughs that might not have been achieved through applied research and technology alone.

Nowadays many of the fundamental questions in physics continue to concern the structure of the universe. We can describe many of the features of the matter we know in the universe to considerable precision, but we also know that this “visible” matter constitutes only about 5% of the total energy of the universe. We know almost nothing about the remaining 95% – dark matter and dark energy. Extending our knowledge of this unknown 95% is by itself a good reason for pursuing fundamental research in this direction; and CERN, with the Large Hadron Collider project, is leading one of the efforts to further this understanding. More important, however, is the potential for this fundamental research of today to lead to the technological innovations of tomorrow, possibly as unsuspected as GPS and the World Wide Web were in 1905.

The Year of Physics also offers an important opportunity to emphasize why continued basic research, particularly in the field of physics, is essential for the 21st century in solving key problems – such as sustainable energy and protecting the environment – and in contributing to health and education, not only in the developed nations, but throughout the world. The late Abdus Salam, a physics Nobel laureate, believed that the gap between rich and poor nations was one of science and technology. In 1988, he wrote that “in the final analysis, creation, mastery and utilization of modern science and technology is basically what distinguishes the South from the North. On science and technology depend the standards of living of a nation”.

The European Union has acknowledged this view of the importance of science and technology, since it wants to become the most advanced knowledge-based economy on the planet before the end of the decade. The US believes itself to be in that position anyway for the foreseeable future. But what of the developing world? With the support of most nations, the UN has declared eight “Millennium Development Goals”, which are aimed at cutting world poverty by half in the coming decade and saving tens of millions of lives in the process. However, as Calestous Juma, the coordinator of the Task Force on Science, Technology, and Innovation for the UN Millennium Project 2005, has stated, “It is inconceivable that the eight Millennium Development Goals can be achieved by 2015 without a focused science, technology and innovation policy.”

Such a focused effort requires the will of many nations to work together. Fifty years ago, CERN came into being in the wake of the Second World War. A handful of scientists and politicians, in Europe and America, had the vision and energy to launch a unique undertaking: the establishment of a centre of excellence for Europe. Today CERN is known to be open to the world. Forgetting their differences of nationality, religion or culture, scientists from around the globe converge at CERN to work together, all sharing a common goal. This melting pot is one of the keys to the laboratory’s success. Based in their own countries, members of collaborations not only provide most of the ambitious experimental apparatus, but they also contribute to a novel, global, powerful information and communication infrastructure using their own countries’ industries and talents in a fair and constructive partnership. And the motivation for all this: cutting-edge physics.

Such collaborative efforts can be obviously applied to the current goals of the developed world. Similar collaborative and global scientific efforts also need to be applied to the goals of the countries on the less fortunate side of the digital and other divides. But underlying all must be the will to continue with curiosity-driven research, which will surely bring unknown benefits. We must allow scientists to keep on asking questions and searching for the answers. To quote Einstein: “We shall require a substantially new manner of thinking if mankind is to survive.”

bright-rec iop pub iop-science physcis connect