Presenting Science: A Practical Guide to Giving a Good Talk by Çiğdem IŞsever and Ken Peach, OUP. Hardback ISBN 9780199549085, £39.95 ($75). Paperback ISBN 9780199549092, £19.95 ($35).
The Craft of Scientific Communication by Joseph E Harmon and Alan G Gross, Chicago University Press. Hardback ISBN 9780226316611, $55. Paperback ISBN 9780226316628, $20. E-book ISBN 9780226316635, $7–$20.
Communication takes many forms, each with its own “how to” manual. Peer-to-peer, communication with the media, reaching exhibition visitors and the public in general: all now have their guides. Each audience deserves particular attention, but the ground rules are always the same: define your objectives, work out a strategy for achieving those objectives and then plan your tactics. This approach comes across loud and clear in these two very different books.
Physicists Çiğdem IŞsever and Ken Peach give a practical guide to preparing a talk, while science communicators Joseph Harmon and Alan Gross take a rather more academic look, focusing on the craft of writing a scientific paper.
IŞsever and Peach deserve high praise not only for producing this book, but also for recognizing that communication skills are important enough to be taught to science students: their book is based on a course they deliver at the University of Oxford. Their key message is to be prepared: know who your audience is, why you are talking to them and what messages you want them to carry away. “The aim,” they write, in bold text, “is to get your message across to your audience clearly and effectively.”
The book walks its readers through the steps towards achieving that goal, urging would-be speakers to research the event that they’ll be talking at and the audience they’ll be talking to, before giving advice on how to prepare the ubiquitous PowerPoint presentation. “The purpose of the slides,” reads chapter two, “is to help the audience understand the subject. Once you start to relax on this and make the slides serve some other purpose (like being intelligible to those who were not there) you risk confusing the audience.” In other words, choose your message, package it for your audience and stick to it. It’s good advice.
Later chapters develop key themes. Chapter three talks about structure: tell people what you’re going to say, say it and then remind them of what you’ve said. Chapter four develops the theme of understanding the audience’s needs, while chapter five addresses style: if you’re talking to an audience of particle physicists, for example, you’ll adopt a different style from what you would choose for school pupils.
IŞsever and Peach are somewhat disparaging about the use of corporate image, arguing that it takes up too much space and leaves little for content. In corporate communication, this is often the case, but it doesn’t have to be that way. Whether we like it or not, the word “branding” has entered the lexicon of communication in particle physics: we’re all jostling for a place in the public’s consciousness, and brand identity helps. Establishing the brand has been a key ingredient of CERN’s communication, for example, throughout the start-up phase of the LHC. Partly as a result, CERN and the LHC are fast becoming household names, providing a strong platform on which to build scientific and societal messages.
The book winds up where it began: reminding readers that the key to success is thorough preparation. Like much of the book’s advice, this applies equally well to any form of communication, be it with lab visitors, journalists or even your neighbours.
Harmon and Gross take an altogether more academic approach, analysing and dissecting the scientific paper through the ages to identify and codify what works and what doesn’t. It is the classic textbook to IsŞsever and Peach’s field guide, each chapter ending with exercises for the student.
It’s a bold thing to attempt to improve on some of the most successful papers of the 20th century, but on page 22 Harmon and Gross do just that, while being careful to point out that their book was not subject to the same length constraints that a journal imposes. The point they make is that each part of a paper has a specific role to play, and by respecting that rule you’ll craft a better paper. A typical abstract, they argue, tells the reader what was done, how it was done and what was discovered. On page 22, they add a fourth element: why it matters. In doing so, the abstract becomes not only informative but also persuasive.
Harmon and Gross go on to apply the same rigorous approach to communications, ranging from grant proposals to writing for the general public, inevitably arriving at the subject of PowerPoint. In a chapter that resonates strongly with IŞsever and Peach, they point out a common failing of PowerPoint presentations: their creators often forget that audiences have only a minute or two to view each slide. Their key message? A PowerPoint slide is not a page from a scientific paper.
The book concludes with a final thought that, while most of us will never scale the intellectual heights of the great names of science, we can all aspire to approach them in terms of the clarity of our communication. These are two very different books on science communication, but their authors share a common belief that good science communication is a craft that can be learnt. Either one is a good place to start.
James Gillies, CERN.
Ultraviolet and Soft X-ray Free-Electron Lasers: Introduction to Physical Principles, Experimental Results, Technological Challenges by Peter Schmüser, Martin Dohlus and Jörg Rossbach, Springer. Hardback ISBN 9783540795711, £126 (€139.95, $189).
Even at first glance my impression of this book was positive. Many coloured illustrations with detailed comments attracted my attention, so initially I began to read around them. A further study did not alter this first impression.
The field of free-electron laser (FEL) technology has reached a high state of the art in recent years, with operation demonstrated at high power (14 kW at Jefferson Lab), for soft X-rays (FLASH at DESY) and hard X-rays (the Linac Coherent Light Source at SLAC). The authors are well known experts in the field. Jörg Rossbach, for example, led the successful development of FELs at DESY for many years. Therefore, their book is interesting not only as a primer on FEL physics for students, but also as a reflection of the “view from inside”, expressing the personal opinions of people who made a real FEL with unique radiation parameters.
“We must study a lot to learn something.” This three-century-old aphorism of the Baron de Montesquieu is fully true for modern technology, and in particular for FEL technology. One really needs to know much to understand how an FEL works, and much more to design and build an FEL facility. The book therefore covers both the theoretical description of FEL physics and the experimental methods used to build an FEL and to control the radiation parameters.
The first half provides an introduction to the theory of the FEL. It gives the reader a clear picture of electron motion in an FEL, with the 1-D FEL equations used to demonstrate principles of FEL operation. Analytical and numerical solutions of these equations, combined with a discussion of limitations of the 1-D theory, give the full and explicit picture of FEL physics. Despite the use of simplified mathematical models, the authors succeed in presenting a physically transparent description of issues as advanced as self-amplified spontaneous emission (SASE), the FEL radiation spectrum, radiation-energy fluctuations etc. Parametrizations of numerical results allow the reader to make fast but reasonable estimates of the influence of the electron-beam parameters on the length and output power of a SASE FEL. Some theoretical issues, which are frequently not included in courses on general physics, but are useful for deeper understanding, are briefly described with references to more detailed textbooks and are given in several appendices.
The second part of the book contains a description of experimental results and the FEL installation at the FLASH facility, which provides an excellent example for the explanation of technical details. It is recent enough to use relatively new techniques and approaches, but has operated long enough as a user facility for the experimental techniques to be well developed and tested, as well as for the real parameters of the electron and radiation beams and the corresponding limitations to be explored. The authors compare measurements with theoretical predictions for the dependence of the radiation power and the degree of bunching on the co-ordinate along the undulator, for example. This confirms that the numerous formulae of the first part are really useful.
The main part of the description of FLASH is devoted to the accelerator and electron-beam parameters. This is natural, because the cost of the accelerator and the efforts for its operation are the dominant parts of the cost and effort of the whole FEL installation. The undulator line, which is another important part of the FEL, is described only briefly, probably indicating that the FLASH undulator is so good and reliable that people almost forget about it. A brief discussion of the challenges and prospects for X-ray FELs concludes the book.
Because the book focuses on X-ray FELs, it cannot touch all aspects of FEL physics and technology, so some important FEL-related issues must be studied through other books and papers. For undulators the authors refer to the corresponding book by J A Clarke, The Science and Technology of Undulators and Wigglers (OUP 2004). A better understanding of high-gain FEL physics can be achieved by reading old books on microwave travelling-wave tubes, which contain almost all the equations and results of 1-D FEL theory. Indeed, the first high-gain FEL – the travelling-wave tube with undulator called the “ubitron” (150 kW peak power at 5 mm wavelength) – was built by Robert M Phillips in 1957. Further study may be continued through the annual FEL conference proceedings and references to papers they contain.
Thus, this book is very useful for students who are beginning to study FEL physics. It is also valuable for experts, who may look at their research from a different point of view and compare the authors’ way of presenting material with their own way of explaining FEL physics.
Nikolay Vinokurov, Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics.